Efetue administração da cadeia de provisão no desempenho das pyme de fabricação. Aguascalientes, México.

Autores

  • Octavio Hernández Castorena Universidad Autónoma de Aguascalientes
  • Luis Aguilera Enríquez Universidad Autónoma de Aguascalientes.
  • Martha González Adame Universidad Autónoma de Aguascalientes.

Palavras-chave:

Gestão da cadeia de abastecimento, desempenho, Pyme de fabricação, modelo teórico.

Resumo

O presente trabalho de pesquisa visa propor um modelo teórico que consiste em gestão de bloco da cadeia de suprimentos (GCS), consiste em que as dimensões das estratégias e colaboração com fornecedores e pelo bloco de desempenho. Na metodologia, foi realizado trabalho de campo com a participação de gestores de Pyme fabricação em Aguascalientes. A amostra consistiu de 288 empresas. Os dados coletados foram analisados com a técnica estatística de análise de equações estruturais adequadas para o design dos modelos teóricos suportados pelo software EQS. Os resultados mostram que o GCS através de estratégias e de colaboração com os fornecedores, têm uma influência significativa sobre o desempenho das Pyme de fabricação, permitindo-lhe destacar que os empregadores devem implementar estratégias que impactam diretamente sobre os benefícios que leva para o excelente relacionamento com fornecedores desde sua participação afeta significativamente não só no assunto de GCS, mas no desempenho das Pyme de fabricação.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Octavio Hernández Castorena, Universidad Autónoma de Aguascalientes

Profesor investigador, Universidad Autónoma de Aguascalientes. Av. Universidad s/n C.P. 20200, Aguascalientes, Ags., México.

Luis Aguilera Enríquez, Universidad Autónoma de Aguascalientes.

Profesor investigador, Universidad Autónoma de Aguascalientes. Av. Universidad s/n. C.P. 20200, Aguascalientes, Ags., México.

Martha González Adame, Universidad Autónoma de Aguascalientes.

Profesor investigador, Universidad Autónoma de Aguascalientes. Avenida Universidad No. 940, Ciudad Universitaria.

Referências

Aguilera, E. L., Hernández, C. O. & López, T. C. G. (2012). La gestión de las cadenas de suministro y los procesos de producción. Mercados y Negocios, 13(2), 43-66.

Amid, A., Ghodsypour, S. & O'Brien, C. (2006). Fuzzy mult i objective linear model for Supplier selection in a supply Chain, International Journal of Production Economics, 104 (2), 394-407.

Anderson, J. & Gerbing, D. (1988), “Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach”, Psychological Bulletin, (13), 411-423.

Araz, C. & Ozkarahan, 1. (2007), Supplier evaluation and management system for strategic sourcing based on a new multicriteria sorting procedure, International Journal of Production Economics, 1, 585-606

Ayers, J. B. (2001 ). Handbook of supply chain management. Boca Raton. Fla.: The St. Lucie Press/APICS Series on Resource Management.

Bagozzi, R. & Yi, Y. (1988), “On the evaluation of structural equation models”, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16 (1), 74-94.

Ciborra, C. U. (1993). Teams, markets and systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Cheti, C, Lin, T. & Huang. S. (2006). A ftizzy approach for supplier evaluation and selection in supply chain management, International Journal of Production Economics, 102 (2), 289-301.

Christopher, M. (1998). Logistics and Supply Chain Management, 2 Ed. New York: Financial Times/Prentice Hall

Christopher, M. (1998). Strategies for reducing costs and improving services. En Logistics and Supply Chain Management. London: Pitman Publishing

Chow, D., & Heaver, T. (1999). Logistics strategies for North America. En Global Logistics and Distribution Planning. 3rd ed.

De Boer, L., Labro. E. & Morlacchi, P. (2001). A review of methods supporting supplier selection, European Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 1 (2), 75-89.

Faez, F., Ghodsypour, S. & O'Brien, C. (2006). Vendor selection and order allocation using an integrated fuzzy case-based reasoning and mathematical programming model, International Journal of Production Economics, 1, 394-407.

Fornell, C. & Larcker, D. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, (19, 39-50.

Forbes.com. (2006). Logistics glossary. Recuperado el 1 de July de 2011, de [Online] Avaible: http://www.forbes.com/fdc/logistics/glossary_d.shtml http://www.emeraldinsight.com/Insight/ViewContentServlet?Filename=Published/EmeraldFullTextArticle/Articles/0240150405.htm

Grant, D., Lambert, D., Stock, J., & Ellram, L. (2006). Fundamentals of logistics management, European Edn. Berkshire: McGraw-Hill Book Co.

Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L. & Black, W.C. (1995). Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings. New York: Prentice-Hall.

Hatcher, L. (1994). A Step by Step Approach to Using the SAS System for Factor Analysis and Structural Equation Modeling, Cary, NC, SAS Institute Inc.

Hernández, C. O., Aguilera, E. L. & González, A. M. (2014). The Influence of information Technology and communication Supply Chain management performance for greater sme manufacturing in Aguascalientes, International, Journal of Business, Economics and Management, 1(12), 382-396.

Hernández, C. O., Aguilera, E. L. & Colín, Salgado, M. (2013). La Gestión de los Proveedores: Estrategia clave para una mejor Gestión de la Cadena de Suministro en la Pyme Manufacturera en Aguascalientes. Estudios de Ciencias Sociales y Administrativas de la Universidad de Celaya, 3(1), 9-20.

Jitesh, T. (2008). Evaluation of buyer-supplier relationships using an integrated mathematical approach of interpretive structural modeling (ISM) and graph theoretic matrix: The case Study of Indian automotive SMEs Jitesh Thakkar, Journai of Manufacturing Technoiogy Management, l9 (1), 92-124.

Lee, S., & Peterson, S. (2000). Culture, entrepreneurial orientation, and global competitiveness. Journal of World Business, 35(4), 401-416.

Liao. Z. & Rittscher, J. (2005). A multi-objective supplier selection model under stochastic demand conditions, Internationaljournal of Production Economics, 105(1), 150-159.

Liu, F. & Hai, H. (2005). The voting analytic hierarchy process method for selecting Supplier, Internationaljournal of Production Economics., 97 (3), 308-317.

Little, A. (1999). A European Supply Chain (SC) survey, Available:http://www.adlittle.be/insights/studies/pdf/european_supply_chain_survey.pdf.

Masella, C. (2007). A contingent approach to the design of vendor selection systems for different types of co-operative customer/ supplier Relation ships, ¡nienmtional Journal of Operation.s and Production Management, 20( 1 ), 70-84.

Mbang, J. A. (2012). A new introduction to supply chains and supply chain management: Definitions and theories perspective. International Business Research, 5(1), 194-207.

Neely, A., Gregory, M., & Platts, M. (1995). Performance measurement system design: A literature review and research agenda. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 15(4), [Online] Available:

New, S. & Philip P. (1995). Research Frameworks in Logistics: Three Models, Seven Dinners and a Survey, International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 25(10), 60-77

Nunnally, J.C. and Bernstein, I. H. (1994), Psychometric Theory, 3ª ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Osorio, G. J. C., Herrera, U. M. F. y Vinasco. M. A. (2008). Modelo para la evaluación del desempeño de los proveedores utilizando AHP, Ingeniería & Desarrollo, 23, 43-58.

Panayides, P. (2006). Maritime logistics and global supply chains: Towards a research agenda. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 8(1), 3-18. Recuperado de http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.mel.9100147.

Pramatari, K. and Miliotis. P (2008). The impact of collaborative store ordering on shelf availability.Supply Chain Management, An International Journal, 13(1), 49-61

Raymond, L. and St-Pierre, J. (2005). Antecedents and performance outcomes of advanced manufacturing systems sophistication in SMEs. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 25(5-6), 514-533.

Sarache, C. W. A., Castrillón, G. O. D. & Ortiz, F. L. F. (2009), Selección de proveedores: Una aproximación al estado del arte, Cuadernos de Administración de Bogotá, 22 (38), 145-167.

Simchi, L. D., Kaminsky, P., & Simchi, L. E. (2008). Designing and managing the supply chain: concepts, strategies and case studies. Tecc.com.au. (2002). [Online] Recuperado de http://www.tecc.com.au/tecc/guide/glossary.asp: International Edition: McGraw-Hill.

Simchi-Levi, D., Kaminsky, P. & Simchi-Levi, E. (2000). Designing and Managing the Supply Chain. 4ta. Ed. New York: Irwin McGraw-Hill

Tyan, J., Wang, F.K. & Du, T. (2003). An evaluation of freight consolidation policies in global third party logistics. Omega, 31, 55–62

Wisner, J.D. (2003). A Structural Equation Model of Supply Chain management Strategies and Firm Performance, Journal of Business Logistics. 24(1), 1-26.

Wong, W., & Wong, K. (2007). Supply chain performance measurement system using dea modeling. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 107(3), [Online] Recuperado de http://emeraldinsight.com/Insight/ViewContentServlet;jsessionid=E57B39C6CE4796DA8D44590D80E6077B?

Publicado

2016-06-30

Como Citar

Hernández Castorena, O., Aguilera Enríquez, L., & González Adame, M. (2016). Efetue administração da cadeia de provisão no desempenho das pyme de fabricação. Aguascalientes, México. Amazonia Investiga, 5(8), 22–31. Recuperado de https://amazoniainvestiga.info/index.php/amazonia/article/view/699

Edição

Seção

Articles