v. 7 n. 14 (2018)
Articles

Mecanismo de evolução do estado: abordagem do sistema

Valentin Ya. Lyubashyts
South Federal University.
Biografia do Autor

Doctor of Legal Sciences, Professor. Head of the Department of Theory and History of State and Law. South Federal University.

Nikolay V. Razuvaev
North-West Institute of Management of the Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Service.
Biografia do Autor

Doctor of Legal Sciences, Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Civil and Labor Law, North-West Institute of Management of the Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Service.

Veronika B. Romanenko
Taganrog Institute of Management and Economics.
Biografia do Autor

Candidate of Legal Sciences, Associate Professor. Taganrog Institute of Management and Economics.

Sergey S. Shestopal
Vladivostok State University of Economics and Service. (Vladivostok, Russia).
Biografia do Autor

Candidate of Legal Sciences, Associate Professor. Vladivostok State University of Economics and Service. (Vladivostok, Russia).

L. V. Gurak
Yaroslav Mudry National Law University
Biografia do Autor

PhD, Assistant of the Business Law Department, Yaroslav Mudry National Law University. Kharkiv, Ukraine.

Publicado 2018-06-29

Palavras-chave

  • Estado, evolução do estado, estado, sociedade política, tipos históricos do estado.

Como Citar

Lyubashyts, V. Y., Razuvaev, N. V., Romanenko, V. B., Shestopal, S. S., & Gurak, L. V. (2018). Mecanismo de evolução do estado: abordagem do sistema. Amazonia Investiga, 7(14), 340–349. Recuperado de https://amazoniainvestiga.info/index.php/amazonia/article/view/527

Resumo

O artigo descreve e analisa em detalhes o mecanismo de evolução do estado. Os autores mostram que muitas teorias e doutrinas diferentes, vários esquemas para tipificar as formas evolutivas do estado se desenvolveram ao longo da longa história da existência das ciências jurídicas, filosóficas e políticas. O conteúdo do trabalho inclui a discussão das dificuldades em desenvolver teorias rigorosas sobre a evolução das formas de estado associadas à complexidade e ambiguidade de processos históricos particulares de formação e desenvolvimento do Estado.
Os autores distinguir e considerar as características evolutivas do Estado moderno, justificar o Estado moderno como um tipo histórica tem uma série de características que não são inerentes (ou inerente apenas em parte), tanto no status tradicional como o proto-moderno, que eles formam suas características evolutivas, especificidade funcional e transformação evolutiva. Além disso, o artigo identifica e analisa quatro principais etapas inovadoras na institucionalização política e jurídica da dominação política moderna: estado civil, estado de direito, estado democrático de direito e estado de direito social.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Referências

Adams R.N., (1975). Energy and Structure. A Theory of Social Power. Austin.

Aron. (1965). Democratie et Totalitarisme. Gallimard, P. 234.

Bytyak, Y. P., Yakovyuk, I. V., Tragniuk, O., Komarova, T. V., & Shestopal, S. S. (2017). The State Sovereignty and Sovereign Rights: the Correlation Problem. Man in India, 97(23), 577-588.

Cherdantsev A.F., (1996). Theory of State and Law. Ekaterinburg, P. 27.

Denisov A.I. (1980). Theory of State and Law / Ed. by A.I. Denisov. M., 1980. P. 78.

Dyakonov I.M., (1994). Ways of History.

Ellinek G. (1903). Law in the Modern State. V. 1. General Doctrine of the State. St. Petersburg., P. 22, 186.

Fried M.H., (1967). The evolution of political society; An essay in political anthropology. New York: Random House.

General Theory of State and Law. Academic Course. V. 1 / Ed. by M.N. Marchenko. M., 2001. P. 181.

Gorodtsov V.A. (1927). Typological Method in Archeology. Ryazan, P. 3.

Gurevich A.Ya., (1990). Theory of Formations and Reality of History // Issues of Philosophy. No. 11. P. 36, 39.

Haas J. (1995). Ways to statehood // Alternative Ways of Early Statehood / Ed. by I.N. Kradin, V.A. Lynsha. Vladivistok: Dalnauka, P. 22.

Helsen G. (1946). General Theory of Law and State. Cambridge, P. 284.

Kareyev N.I. (1905), Typological and World-Historical Point of View in Studying History // In Collection: News of the St. Petersburg Polytechnic Institute (Department of Economics). V. 3. Issue 1-2. St. Petersburg, 1905. P. 71.

Korelsky V.M., Perevalov V.D., (2000). Theory of State and Law / Ed. by Professor V.M. Korelsky and Professor V.D. Perevalov. ?., P. 168.

Korolev A.I., Yavich L.S., (1987). Theory of State and Law / Ed. by A.I. Korolev, L.S. Yavich. 2 nd ed. L., P. 142.

Korotaev A.V. (1991). Some Economic Prerequisites for Class Formation and Politicalogenesis // Archaic Society: Nodal Problems of the Development Sociology. ?., P. 1. P. 141.

Lazarev V.V., (1996). General Theory of Law and State / Ed. by V.V. Lazarev. M., P. 287.

Lyubashits V., (2017). Sociocultural measurement of institutional and functional characteristics of public-power interactions // Lyubashits V., Mamychev A., Uvarova G., Artyukhin O. Man in India. V. 97. ? 23. ?. 461-470.

Lyubashits, V.Y., Mamychev, A.Y., Shalyapin, S.O., Filippova, M.K., (2016). Prognostic problems of the public and power organization of the Russian society: Archetypes and sociocultural basis of functioning and development. International Review of Management and Marketing 6 (6). P. 85-89.

Maciver R. (1964).The Modern State. Oxford, P. 342-343.

Marxist-Leninist Theory of State and Law. V. 1. Basic Institutes and Concepts. M., 1970. P. 226-227.

Matuzov N.I., Malko A.V. (2004). Theory of State and Law / Ed. by Professor N.I. Matuzov and Professor A.V. Malko. ?., P. 53.

Mordovtsev Andrey Yuryevich, Mamychev Alexey Yurievich, Shestopal Sergey Stanislavovich, (2017). Essential content of Russian legal mentality // Azimuth of Scientific Research: Economics and Administration. 2017. V. 6. ? 4(21)

Mordovtsev ?. , Zhinkin S., Mamychev A., Yakovyuk I., Shestopal S. (2017). Legal Mentality in National Cultural Space: Characteristics of the ERA of Change (Church Schism of the 17th Century). Man in India, 97(23), 295-309.

Oberg K. (1955).Types of Social Structure Among the Lowland Tribes of South and Central America // American Anthropologist. Vol. 57. ?. 472-487.

Petrov VS, (1967). Type and Forms of State. L., P. 21.

Ross Alf., (1960). On the Concepts "State" and "State Organs" in Constitutional Law. Scandinavian Studies in Low. Vol. 5. ?. 123-124.

Rozov N. (2001). On the Way to the Well-Founded Periodizations of the World History // Time of Peace. Issue 2. Vovosibirsk, P. 62.

Rzhevsky V.A. (1992). Fundamentals of State and Law. Rostov-on-Don, P. 13.

Shestopal, S. S., Lyubashits, V. Y., Astakhov, V. V., Pismennaya, E. E., Ryazantsev, S. V., Fedulov, A. M., & Barsukov, P. V. (2016). Features of Building Control Systems Sub-Locality in Modern Russia. International Review of Management and Marketing, 6(1S), 78-83.

Sulimenko N.V. (2010). Historical Types of State: Concepts and Approaches to Distinguishing Typological Features // Collection. 2-nd International Scientific and Practical Conference "Problems of Regional Management, Economics, Law and Innovation Processes in Education". Taganrog, P. 83-85.

Theory of Government and Law. (1948). ?., P. 143.

Theory of State and Law / Ed. by A.M. Vasiliev. M., 1977. P. 97.

Voget F.W. (1975). A history of ethnology. N.Y.: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, ?. 862.

Vorontsov S.A., (2017). Elitogenesis in the political processes of modern Russia, based on sociological (field) research. // Vorontsov S.A., Mamychev A.Yu., Ponedelkov A.V., Yanguzin A.R., Vildanov H. Man in India. ?. 97. ? 23. ?. 273-284.