Interacción entre las autoridades y el sector no lucrativo en la Federación de Rusia: recursos y desarrollo de restricciones

Autores/as

  • Elena V. Frolova Department of Management and Administration Russian State Social University, Russian Federation
  • Natalia V. Medvedeva Department of Management and Administration; Russian State Social University, Russian Federation
  • Tatyana M. Ryabova Department of Management and Administration; Russian State Social University, Russian Federation
  • Olga V. Rogach Department of Management and Administration; Russian State Social University, Russian Federation
  • Lyudmila V. Senicheva Department of Management and Administration Russian State Social University, Russian Federation

Palabras clave:

Organizaciones sin fines de lucro, autoridades, recursos de desarrollo, asociación intersectorial, mecanismos de apoyo.

Resumen

El objetivo del trabajo es estudiar las condiciones de funcionamiento de las OSFL rusas, los problemas clave y las tendencias de su desarrollo, y desarrollar los mecanismos que proporcionan prácticas constructivas para la cooperación entre el estado y el sector sin fines de lucro. Los resultados de los estudios estadísticos ilustran un alto nivel de diferenciación territorial entre los representantes del sector no comercial, que crea desigualdad en términos de acceso a los servicios sociales, las oportunidades para satisfacer las necesidades sociales de la población, el desarrollo de la sociedad civil, la participación de grupos sociales para el desarrollo y la implementación de decisiones gerenciales en el ámbito social. Un bajo nivel de seguridad financiera y de infraestructura de las actividades de OSFL, la falta de apoyo voluntario conducen a la reducción de las tendencias y al volumen de asistencia social para la población. Actualmente, la interacción del gobierno local y las organizaciones públicas sin fines de lucro se caracteriza por modelos de cooperación bastante estrechos. El mecanismo principal que puede proporcionar la modernización necesaria de las actividades de organizaciones sin fines de lucro, el aumento de su función y representación en la solución de problemas públicos, es una asociación social intersectorial que puede proporcionar una coordinación constructiva de puestos de agentes clave en el espacio social, una interacción efectiva de organismos gubernamentales, población y organizaciones públicas.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Biografía del autor/a

Elena V. Frolova, Department of Management and Administration Russian State Social University, Russian Federation

Doctor of sociological sciences, professor of the Department of Management and Administration Russian State Social University, Russian Federation

Natalia V. Medvedeva, Department of Management and Administration; Russian State Social University, Russian Federation

Candidate of sociological sciences, assistant professor at the Department of Management and Administration; Russian State Social University, Russian Federation

Tatyana M. Ryabova, Department of Management and Administration; Russian State Social University, Russian Federation

Candidate of sociological sciences, assistant professor at the Department of Management and Administration;
Russian State Social University, Russian Federation

Olga V. Rogach, Department of Management and Administration; Russian State Social University, Russian Federation

Candidate of sociological sciences, assistant professor at the Department of Management and Administration;
Russian State Social University, Russian Federation

Lyudmila V. Senicheva, Department of Management and Administration Russian State Social University, Russian Federation

Senior lecturer of the Department of Management and Administration Russian State Social University, Russian Federation

Citas

Audretsch D.B., Wessner C. (2005). Local Heroes in the Global Village. Globalization and New Entrepreneurship Policies, New York: Springer Science + Media Inc.

Breschi S. (1997). Sectoral systems of innovation: technological regimes, Schumpeterian dynamics and spatial boundaries // Edquist C. (ed), Systems of innovation. F Pinter, London, pp. 130-156.

Carlsson B. (1991). On the nature, function and composition of technological systems / B. Carlsson, R. Stankiewicz // Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Vol. 1. Issue 2. - pp. 93-118.

Chesbrough H. W. (2003). Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology // Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

Cooke P. (1992). Regional innovation systems: competitive regulation in the new Europe // Geoforum, ? 23. - pp. 365-382

Esina Yu.L., Stepanenkova N.M., Agafonova E.E. (2015). Forms and mechanisms of science, education and business community integration in the context of regional economy innovative renewal. // Creative economics. V.9. No. 12. pp. 1491-1508

Etzkowitz H. (1995). The Triple Helix University-Industry-Government Relations: a Laboratory for Knowledge-Based Economic Development // EASST Review, — Vol. 14. — ? 1. — pp. 14-19.

Federal service of state statistics. (2018). // official site - Access mode: http://www.gks.ru/ Reference date: 20.0.2018.

Itskovits G. (2010). Triple helix: Universities - Enterprises - State: Innovations in action. Tomsk: Publishing house of Tomsk State University of Control Systems and Radioelectronics, 238 p.

Ivanova N. (2002). National Innovation Systems // Moscow: Nauka, 224 p.

Kuzubov A. A. (2017). Innovative business interests as an integral part of post-industrial economy // Azimuth of Scientific Research: Economics and Administration. ?. 6. ? 1(18). pp. 87-90.

Lundvall B.-A. (1994). The Learning Economy // Journal of Industry Studies, Vol. 1. - pp. 23-42;

Maxwell I. (2009). Managing Sustainable Innovation: The Driver for Global Growth // NewYork: Springer.

Mukhamedyarov A.M., Divaeva, E.A. (2011). Foreign experience in a regional innovation system development // Economics and management. ? 3. pp. 92-99

Nelson ?d. R. (1993). National systems of innovation: A comparative study // Oxford University Press.

North D. (2000). ??????????, ??????????? ????? ?? ?????????????? ????????? // ?: ??????, 2000. – 198 p.

Regional Innovation Scoreboard. (2014). // European Union, 2014.

Russell M. G. et al. (2011). Transforming Innovation Ecosystems through Shared Vision and Network Orchestration //Triple Helix IX International Conference. Stanford.

Russell M. G. (2011). Transforming Innovation Ecosystems through Shared Vision and Network Orchestration // Triple Helix IX International Conference. Stanford.

Shashlo N. V. (2017). Organizational and economic model of activization of innovative investment activities of the industrial enterprises // Azimuth of Scientific Research: Economics and Administration, V. 6. ? 4(21). pp. 279-282.

Shashlo N.V., Petruk G.V. (2017). The Consumer Value of Knowledge in the Innovative Ecosystem of the Russian Far East // University Management: Practice and Analysis, Vol. 21. No. 5 (111). pp. 93-102.

Smorodinskaya N.V. (2015). The globalized economy: from hierarchies to the network way of life. M.: Institute of Ecology, RAS, 344 p.

Sverker A. (2000). Corporate Innovation Systems / A. Sverker, J. Staffan, S. Soren, O. Christer, N. Teknlic. - Goteborg: Chalmers University of Technology.

Svetlov V.A. (2017). Modern Logic: Textbook. - St. Petersburg.: Peter, 2006. - 400 p.

Venture investment and the ecosystem of technological entrepreneurship [collection of articles] // Russian Venture Company. - Moscow: Business Journal, 2011. - 96 p.

Descargas

Publicado

2018-04-30

Cómo citar

Frolova, E. V., Medvedeva, N. V., Ryabova, T. M., Rogach, O. V., & Senicheva, L. V. (2018). Interacción entre las autoridades y el sector no lucrativo en la Federación de Rusia: recursos y desarrollo de restricciones. Amazonia Investiga, 7(13), 364–373. Recuperado a partir de https://amazoniainvestiga.info/index.php/amazonia/article/view/572

Número

Vol. 7 Núm. 13 (2018)

Sección

Articles