Vol. 8 No. 21 (2019)
Articles

Scientific Text Semantic Structure Modeling

Elena Bazhenova
Perm state national research University
Author Biography

Perm state national research University

Larisa Tihomirova
Perm state national research University.
Author Biography

Perm state national research University.

Larisa Kyrkunova
Perm state national research University
Author Biography

Perm state national research University

Natalya Danilevskaya
Perm state national research University.
Author Biography

Perm state national research University.

Tatyana Кarpova
Perm state national research University
Author Biography

Perm state national research University

Published 2019-08-31

Keywords

  • The stylistics of scientific speech, scientific text, epistemic situation, new knowledge, old knowledge, scientific text model, subtext.

How to Cite

Bazhenova, E., Tihomirova, L., Kyrkunova, L., Danilevskaya, N., & Кarpova T. (2019). Scientific Text Semantic Structure Modeling. Amazonia Investiga, 8(21), 163–167. Retrieved from https://amazoniainvestiga.info/index.php/amazonia/article/view/84

Abstract

Authors proposed and substantiated the model of polytextual structural organization for a scientific text, taking into account its dependence on the content of the scientist's cognitive activity. The model is based on the concept of an epistemic situation in the unity of four aspects of knowledge: ontological, methodological, reflexive, and communicative-pragmatic. The concept of subtext is introduced as a structural-semantic unit of a scientific text. They considered the content of subtext new and old knowledge, evaluation, authorization, etc.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Apresyan, Yu. D. (1988). Pragmatic information for the explanatory dictionary. Pragmatics and the problems of intensionality. M.: Institute of Linguistics, USSR Academy of Sciences, 7–44.

Bazhenova, E. A. (2001). Nauchnyi tekst v aspekte politekstualnosti [Scientific Text in the Aspect of Politextuality]. Perm, PGU Publ.

Chernyavskaya, V. E. (2017). Nauchnyj diskurs: Vydvizhenie rezul’tata kak kommunikativnaja i jazykovaja problema [Scientific Discourse: promotion of the result as a communicative and linguistic problem]. Moscow, Lenand Publ.

Kotyurova, M. P. (1996). The expression of the epistemic situation in the peripheral texts of the whole work. History sketches for the scientific style of the Russian literary language of the XVIII - XX centuries, 2(1), 341–370.

Kotyurova, M. P., Tikhomirova, L. S., Solovyova, N. V., (2012). Idioistilistics of scientific speech. Perm: Publishing House "Ot i Do": 393.

Lee, Y., Capraro, R. M., & Capraro, M. M. (2018). Mathematics Teachers’ Subject Matter Knowledge and Pedagogical Content Knowledge in Problem Posing. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 13(2), 75-90. https://doi.org/10.12973/iejme/2698

Lopes, I. M., & Oliveira, P. (2018). Evaluation of the Implementation of the General Data Protection Regulation in Health Clinics. Journal of Information Systems Engineering & Management, 3(4), 28.

Luria, A. R., (1979). Language and consciousness. Moscow: MSU: 320.

Silverstein, M., & Urban, G. (Eds.). (1996). Natural histories of discourse. University of Chicago Press.

Tikhomirova, L. S., Danilevskaya, N. V., Bazhenova, E. A., Kyrkunova, L. G., & Ovsyannikova, S. E. (2015). Role of the Structure of Public Service Advertising Text in In?uencing its Recipient. The Social Sciences, 10(6), 1371-1374.

Van Dijk, T. A. (1997). The study of discourse. Discourse as structure and process, 1, 1-34.