National-cultural specificity of semantics of phraseological units, relating to the semantic field "idleness" in the english and russian languages

Authors

  • Liya F. Shangaraeva Kazan Federal University, Leo Tolstoy Institute of Philology and Intercultural Communication Kazan, Russia.
  • Marina B. Grolman Kazan Federal University, Leo Tolstoy Institute of Philology and Intercultural Communication Kazan, Russia.
  • Guo Lin Kazan Federal University, Leo Tolstoy Institute of Philology and Intercultural Communication Kazan, Russia.
  • Faruk Acar Marmara University Istanbul, Turkey

Keywords:

Image, idioms, English, Russian, semantics, field

Abstract

National-cultural specificity of semantics of phraseological units (PU), characterizing the labor activity, in the English and Russian languages, has its special and actual significance in perceiving the depths of national consciousness. This research is devoted to the identification and comparative description of the semantic field of the PU type being investigated and the image-motivational aspects of the PU meaning. The universal and unique traits in the semantics of the PU of both languages are studied, the cultural connotation is defined and described through the cultural interpretation mechanism of all the content components of the studied PU.
Cultural connotation, being an interpretation of the components of the PU meaning in the categories of culture, is layered into the connotation as a linguistic concept. Each component of the PU connotation is able to provide additional information of a national cultural character. First of all, such components of the connotation are the emotive and evaluative macrocomponents of the PU semantics.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Liya F. Shangaraeva, Kazan Federal University, Leo Tolstoy Institute of Philology and Intercultural Communication Kazan, Russia.

Kazan Federal University, Leo Tolstoy Institute of Philology and Intercultural Communication Kazan, Russia.

Marina B. Grolman, Kazan Federal University, Leo Tolstoy Institute of Philology and Intercultural Communication Kazan, Russia.

Kazan Federal University, Leo Tolstoy Institute of Philology and Intercultural Communication Kazan, Russia.

Guo Lin, Kazan Federal University, Leo Tolstoy Institute of Philology and Intercultural Communication Kazan, Russia.

Kazan Federal University, Leo Tolstoy Institute of Philology and Intercultural Communication Kazan, Russia.

Faruk Acar, Marmara University Istanbul, Turkey

Marmara University Istanbul, Turkey

References

Husnutdinov, D.H., Yusupova, Z.F, Shakurova, M.M, Yusupov, A.F., Mirzagitov, R.H. (2016).

Practical Aspect of Comparative Reserch on the Material of the Russian and Tatar Languages: XIX-XXI Centuries. Journal of Language and Literature, ISSN: 2078-0303, Vol. 7. No. 2. May, 2016. PP 191 -194.

Karaulov, J.N. (1981). Linguistic designing and thesaurus of the literary language. Moscow, 366 p.

Kosharnaya S.?. (1999). In the mirror of the lexicon: Introduction to linguoculturology. Belgorod, 142 p.

Maslova, V.A. (2012). Study of the most important concepts of Russian culture by inofonams (for example, the concept of family) / Russian as a foreign language: a new in theory and methodology. III scientific-methodical reading. Coll. articles. Issue 3. Moscow, Moscow State Pedagogical Institute, 2012, 214p.

Maslova, V.?. (2001). Linguoculturology. Moscow: Publishing house «Akademia», 202 p.

Murzin L.N. (1997). About linguoculturology, its content and methods // COLLEGIUM, ?1.

Sharafutdinova, L.R., Deputatova, N.A., Biktagirova, Z.A., Shangaraeva, L.F.& Kasimov O.H. Means of Expressing Initial Remarks of Disagreement in the British Culture (based on the novel “Little Women” by L. M. Alcott) // The Turkish Online Journal of Design, Art and Communication TOJDAC. - April 2017. - Special Edition. P. 1062-1066

Shendeleva, E.A. (1999). The field organization of figurative lexicon and phraseology. Moscow, 74 – 79p.

Teliya, V.N. (1996). Russian phraseology. Semantic, pragmatic and linguocultural aspects. Moscow: Publishing house «Shkola».

Ufimtseva, A.A. (1961). Theories of the semantic field and possibility of their application when studying vocabulary of language. Moscow, 78-120p.

Vorobyov V.V. (1997). Linguoculturology (theory and methods). ?oscow, 331 p.

Downloads

Published

2018-04-30

How to Cite

Shangaraeva, L. F., Grolman, M. B., Lin, G., & Acar, F. (2018). National-cultural specificity of semantics of phraseological units, relating to the semantic field "idleness" in the english and russian languages. Amazonia Investiga, 7(13), 227–232. Retrieved from https://amazoniainvestiga.info/index.php/amazonia/article/view/548

Issue

Vol. 7 No. 13 (2018)

Section

Articles