Functions of numbers in korean phraseological units

  • Julia Ju. Valieva Kazan Federal University, Institute of International Relations, History and Oriental Studies
  • Alfiya R. Alikberova Kazan Federal University, Institute of International Relations, History and Oriental Studies

Résumé

Fixed phrases of Korean like idioms of other languages have their own, national, peculiarities. Components of these phraseological units can be characterized as units that have structural and semantic features together with their own unique particularities. It is only well too known that phraseological units particularly but not exceptionally proverbs and sayings are characterised to have multiple meaning. It is commonly supposed that phraseological units with numeral components to be the particular interest in linguistics. The aim of this paper is to analyse the function of such numeral components as ‘열’ (ten), ‘하나’ (one) и ‘셋’ (three) in Korean proverbs that are related to the theme of thievery and thieving. In this article under consideration there were chosen phraseological units related to theme of thievery and thieving. In order to select phraseological units that were used in this paper for illustrative purposes the continuous sampling method was used. In order to make research the method of content analysis was used when there had been made classification of fixed phrases according to the semantics of used numeral. When writing this article, a comparative-contrastive analysis was also applied. We also used the methods of semantic and component analysis to reveal elementary senses in semantics of linguistic units and to compare the meanings of the lexical units of the source and the target. As a result of made analysis we came to the conclusion that there were marked out such semantics of numeral components as quantity, correlation, frequency, space. What is more, analysed numeral components played as well as the role of intensifier of the conveyed meaning.

##plugins.generic.usageStats.downloads##

##plugins.generic.usageStats.noStats##

Bibliographies de l'auteur

Julia Ju. Valieva, Kazan Federal University, Institute of International Relations, History and Oriental Studies

Kazan Federal University, Institute of International Relations, History and Oriental Studies

Alfiya R. Alikberova, Kazan Federal University, Institute of International Relations, History and Oriental Studies

Kazan Federal University, Institute of International Relations, History and Oriental Studies

Références

Horn, L. (1989). A natural history of negation, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 679.

Huang, Y. Spelke, E, Snedeker, J. (2013). What exactly do number words mean?, Language Learning and Development, v. 9, pp. 105-129.

Levinson, S. (1983). Pragmatics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 420.

Levinson, S. (2000). Presumptive meanings, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 450.

Stalnaker, R. (1980). Pragmatics: Implicature, Presupposition, and Logical Form by Gerald Gazdar, Language, Vol. 56, No. 4, pp. 902-905.

Sung, C., Avdeev, M. (2011). Korean. Introduction course, 242.

Valieva, J. (2017). Semantics Of Numeral «Man» (Thousand) In Proverbs Of The Tatar Language, The Turkish Online Journal of Design, Art and Communication TOJDAC, Special Edition, pp. 827-831.

Valiyeva, Y. (2017). The Numeral of "BER" (one) in Tatar proverbs at the description of the concept "Greed", Innovation, Technology, Science. Collection of articles of the International scientific and practical conference, pp. 76-78.

Valiyeva, Y. (2016). Semantics of a numeral two in proverbial sayings of Tatar, The Priority Scientific Directions: from the theory to practice, No. 31, pp. 105-110.

Valiyeva, Y. (2017). Phraseological units of Tatar with the BER component numeral (one) semantic group "Traits of character", Results of modern research and development the Collection of articles of winners of the International scientific and practical conference, pp. 127-129.
Publiée
2018-04-30
Rubrique
Articles
Bookmark and Share