Relationships between geophysical and geotechnical parameters focusing on a site specific results of a landslide risk area

  • Tariq Alkhamaiseh Department of Geology, Faculty of Science, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
  • Lakam Mejus Department of Geology, Faculty of Science, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
  • Ismail Yusof Department of Geology, Faculty of Science, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
  • Rahman Yaccup
Keywords: landslide, borehole, seismic refraction, electrical resistivity tomography, Wenner –Schlumberger, standard penetration tests.

Abstract

The population growth and extension of a settlement on a risky area have increased the impact of natural disaster. Slope failures, landslides and subsidence of foundation have been identified as the most commonly occurring natural disaster if such sensitive areas are not well monitored. On the other hand, a detailed analysis of the triggering factors is often hindered by the lack of information gathered from the field measurements. A survey investigation was performed in a possible landslide risk area, using the geotechnical, geophysical and geological mapping approaches. The geotechnical investigations included coring in order to obtain the lithological sequence and for sampling purposes. And standard penetration test (SPT) in-situ field tests of soil strength. Electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) and seismic refraction tomography investigations were executed in order to determine the hydrogeological characteristics and delineate the regions of weak and hard subsurface materials. The 2D inversion results of resistivity technique suggested the presence of a two-layer structure model. Moreover, the 'break' in the unit was apparent, indicative of the presence of weak zones, fractured zone and cracks. As also demonstrated clearly by the seismic refraction data, the depth to bedrock (a sharp boundary interface approximately at a depth of 15 m) varies, and such variation is mainly attributed due to the thickness of the overlying backfill material.

Additionally, we examined the possible correlation (if any) between geophysical parameters and geotechnical parameters to establish the quantitative estimates of a particular geotechnical parameter (e.g., soil strength) from geophysical surveys. From this study, a good relationship between electrical property (resistivity) and geotechnical property (soil strength) with the empirical equation RS= 31.733 (N60) -165.88 and regression coefficient R2=0.77 was observed. Based on the correlation between elastic property and weathering profile, we divided the subsurface materials into three zones: the first zone is classified as Residual soil with p-wave velocity (300 – 900 ms-1), the second zone is classified as highly weathered granite with p-wave velocity (900 – 1800 ms-1), and the third zone is classified as moderately weathered granite with p-wave velocity (1800 – 3000 ms-1). All geophysical and geotechnical data suggest that a fairly weak/uncompact backfill materials underlying the bedrock are likely to provide a planar surface where the landslide mass would move/be triggered.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Tariq Alkhamaiseh, Department of Geology, Faculty of Science, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Department of Geology, Faculty of Science, University of Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Lakam Mejus, Department of Geology, Faculty of Science, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Department of Geology, Faculty of Science, University of Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

Ismail Yusof, Department of Geology, Faculty of Science, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Department of Geology, Faculty of Science, University of Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Rahman Yaccup

Malaysian Nuclear Agency, Bangi, 43000 Kajang, Selangor

References

A Bery and R Saad (2012). Clayey Sand Soil’s Behaviour Analysis and Imaging Subsurface Structure via Engi-neering Characterizations and Integrated Geophysicals Tomography Modeling Methods,” International Journal of Geosciences, 3 (1), 93-104.

Aggour M S, and Radding, W R. (2001). Standard Penetration Test (SPT) Correction. Research Report, Civil and Environmental Engineering Department, University of Maryland College Park, Maryland, 20742.

Alkhateeb, M. (2018). Multiple Representations in 8th Grade Mathematics Textbook and the Extent to which Teachers Implement Them. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 14(1), 137-145.

Bogoslovsky V A, Ogilvy A.A. (1977). Geophysical methods for the investigation of landslides. – Geophysics, 42, 562-571.

Bruno F, Marilier F. (2000). Test of high-resolution seismic reflection and other geophysical techniques on the Boup landslide in the Swiss Alps. – Surv. Geophys., 21, 333-348.

Caris J P, Van Asch TH W. (1991). Geophysical, geotechnical and hydrological investigations of a small landslide in the FrenchAlps. – Eng. Geol., 31, 249-276.

D U Deere and D W Deere. (1989). “The Rock Quality Desig-nation (RQD) Index in Practice,” In: L. Kirkaldie, Ed., Rock Classification System for Engineering Purposes, ASTM STP 984, American Society for Testing and Mate-rials, Philadelphia., 91-101.

Gallipoli M, Lapenna V, Lorenzo P,et al. (2000). Comparison of geological and geophysical prospecting techniques in the study of a landslide in southern Italy. – Eur. J. Env. Eng. Geophys., 4, 117-128.

Gue S, Y C. (2002). Mitigation the risk of landslide on hill site development in Malaysai, special lecture, 2nd world engineer congress. IEM Kuching, Srawak, 22nd -25July, 2002.

Hack R. (2000). Geophysics for slope stability. – Surv. Geophys., 21, 423-448.

Lapenna V, Lorenzo P, Perrone A, Piscitelli S, Rizzo E, Sdao F. (2003). High-resolution geoelectrical tomographies in the study of the Giarrossa landslide (Potenza, Basilicata). – Bull. Eng. Geol. Env., 62, 259-68.

Matori A, Abdul Basith and Harahap I. (2011). Study of regional monsoonal effects on landslide hazard zonation in Cameron Highlands, Malaysia. Arab J Geosci DOI 10.1007/s12517-011-0309-4.

Mccann DM, Forster A. (1990). Reconnaissance geophysical methods in landslide investigations – Eng. Geol., 29, 59–78.

Ng, T.F., (1994). Microstructures of deformed granites of eastern Kuala Lumpur— mplications for mechanisms and temperature of deformation. Geological Society of Malaysia Bulletin 35, 47-59.

RafiqulIslam and Zaw Win. (2005). Rofiqul Islam. 2005. Engineering geology and geophysical studies of granite weathering profile at Bukit Fraser,Pahang. Graduate Thesis. National University of Malaysia.

Terrain Resources Sdn Bhd (2016) internal report.

Tsai T L., Chen H F. (2010). Effects of degree of saturation on shallow landslides triggered by rainfall, Environmental Earth Sciences 59(6): 1285–1295. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-009-0116-3.

Venkatasubramanian C and DhinakaranG. (2011). ANN model for predicting CBR from index properties of soils, International Journal of Civil and Structural Engineering, 2(2), 614-620.

Zaiton Harun. (2002). Late Mesozoic - Early Tertiary faults of Peninsular Malaysia. Geological Society of Malaysia Bulletin 45, 117–120.
Published
2018-08-30
How to Cite
Alkhamaiseh, T., Mejus, L., Yusof, I., & Yaccup, R. (2018). Relationships between geophysical and geotechnical parameters focusing on a site specific results of a landslide risk area. Amazonia Investiga, 7(15), 386-398. Retrieved from https://amazoniainvestiga.info/index.php/amazonia/article/view/469
Section
Articles