Monitoramento de downloads de publicações de cientistas da Universidade Estadual de Belgorod (Rússia) por cientistas de outros países
Palavras-chave:
Atividade de publicação, Universidade Estadual de Belgorod, Rússia, matriz de correlação cruzada, Métrica RG, RG Score, ResearchGate, Google Scholar.Resumo
O artigo apresenta uma revisão do funcionamento da rede ResearchGate e o crescimento de sua popularidade a partir de dados literários e de experimentos no mecanismo de busca do Google Scholar. Somente experimentos descrito descarga monitoramento publicações semanais de cientistas da Universidade Estadual de Belgorod (Rússia) por cientistas de outros países (a partir de 2015/11/01 a 2015/12/20), e mostra que os cientistas dos Estados Unidos (aproximadamente 10.000 downloads) em 2015) e China (aproximadamente 6.000 downloads em 2015) estão mais interessados nessas publicações.
Como resultado, vemos uma distribuição muito desigu al de quadrados inversos das publicações da Universidade Estatal de Belgorod por países do mundo. O número total de países parecia ser de 91.
Downloads
Não há dados estatísticos.
Referências
Alheyasat, O. (2015). Examination Expertise Sharing in Academic Social Networks Using Graphs: The Case of ResearchGate, Contempory Engineering Science, 8(3): 137-151.
Alheyasat, O. (2016). Investigation and Analysis of ResearchGate User’s Activities using Neural Networks. The International Arab Journal of Information Technology, 13(2): 320 – 325.
Guskov, A.E., Kosyakov, D.V., Grigoriev, A.V., Sergeev, A.E. (2018). Ispolzuyut li rossiyskie uchenye sovremennye technologii nauchnyh kommunikatsyi? (Do Russian scientists use modern technologies of scientific communications?). Vestnik Novosibirsk State University. Informatsyonnye tehnologii, 16(1): 74-84 (In Russian).
Hoffmann, C. P., Lutz, C., Meckel, M. A. (2016). Relational Altmetric? Network Centrality on ResearchGate as an Indicator of Scientific Impact. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(4): 765-775.
Kraker, P., Lex, E. A Critical. (2015). Look at the ResearchGate Score as a Measure of Scientific Reputation. Proceedings of the Quantifying and Analysing Scholarly Communication on the Web workshop (ASCW’15), Web Science conference.
Memon, A. R. (2016). ResearchGate is no Longer Reliable: Leniency towards Ghost Journals May Decrease its Impact on the Scientific Community J Pak Med Assoc, 66(12): 1643-1647.
Moskovkin, V.M., Peresypkin A.P., Pupynina, E.V. (2013). Izuchenie osobennostey mezhdunarodnyh praktik po vyplate voznagrazgdeniy za nauchnye publikatsii c pomotschyu platformy ResearchGate i personalnoi kommunikatsii. Predvoritelnye resultaty (The study of international practicies of rewards for scientific publications with the help of ResearchGate platform and through personal communication). Belgorod State University Scientific Bulletin. Philosophy. Sociology. Law, 25 (16 (159)): 257-261 (In Russian).
Nicholas, D., Herman, E., Jamali, H. R., Bravo, B. R., Boukacem-Zeghmouri, C., Dobrowolski, T., Pouchot, S. (2015). New ways of building, showcasing, and measuring scholarly reputation. Learned publishing, 28(3): 169-183.
Orduna-Malea, E., Martín-Martín, A., Thelwall, M., López-Cózar, E. D. (2017). Do ResearchGate Scores Create Ghost Academic Reputations? Scientometrics, 112(1): 443-460.
Ovadia, S. (2014). ResearchGate and Academia.edu: Academic Social Networks. Behavioral and Social Sciences Librarian, 33(3): 165-169.
Reza, A.A., Maryam, S., Mehdi, S.B., Abedin, H.A.S. (2015). Presence of Ahavz Universities (Medical Science, Azad and Governmental) Scholars Iranian Library and Information Science Scholars in Academic Social Networks: ResearchGate. Educational Development of Jundishapur, 6(1): 67 – 73.
Thelwall, M., Kousha, K. (2015). ResearchGate: Disseminating, Communicating, and Measuring Scholarship? Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(5): 876-889.
Thelwall, M., Kousha, K. (2017). ResearchGate articles: Age, Discipline, Audience Size, and Impact. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(2): 468-479.
Van Noorden, R. (2014). Online collaboration: Scientists and the Social Networks. Nature, 512(7513): 126-129.
Yu, M.-Ch., Wu, Y.-Ch.J., Alhalabi, W.,Kao, H.-Y. (2016). ResearchGate:An Effective Altmetric Indicator for Active Researchers? Computer in Human Behavior, 55: 1001 – 1006.
Alheyasat, O. (2016). Investigation and Analysis of ResearchGate User’s Activities using Neural Networks. The International Arab Journal of Information Technology, 13(2): 320 – 325.
Guskov, A.E., Kosyakov, D.V., Grigoriev, A.V., Sergeev, A.E. (2018). Ispolzuyut li rossiyskie uchenye sovremennye technologii nauchnyh kommunikatsyi? (Do Russian scientists use modern technologies of scientific communications?). Vestnik Novosibirsk State University. Informatsyonnye tehnologii, 16(1): 74-84 (In Russian).
Hoffmann, C. P., Lutz, C., Meckel, M. A. (2016). Relational Altmetric? Network Centrality on ResearchGate as an Indicator of Scientific Impact. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(4): 765-775.
Kraker, P., Lex, E. A Critical. (2015). Look at the ResearchGate Score as a Measure of Scientific Reputation. Proceedings of the Quantifying and Analysing Scholarly Communication on the Web workshop (ASCW’15), Web Science conference.
Memon, A. R. (2016). ResearchGate is no Longer Reliable: Leniency towards Ghost Journals May Decrease its Impact on the Scientific Community J Pak Med Assoc, 66(12): 1643-1647.
Moskovkin, V.M., Peresypkin A.P., Pupynina, E.V. (2013). Izuchenie osobennostey mezhdunarodnyh praktik po vyplate voznagrazgdeniy za nauchnye publikatsii c pomotschyu platformy ResearchGate i personalnoi kommunikatsii. Predvoritelnye resultaty (The study of international practicies of rewards for scientific publications with the help of ResearchGate platform and through personal communication). Belgorod State University Scientific Bulletin. Philosophy. Sociology. Law, 25 (16 (159)): 257-261 (In Russian).
Nicholas, D., Herman, E., Jamali, H. R., Bravo, B. R., Boukacem-Zeghmouri, C., Dobrowolski, T., Pouchot, S. (2015). New ways of building, showcasing, and measuring scholarly reputation. Learned publishing, 28(3): 169-183.
Orduna-Malea, E., Martín-Martín, A., Thelwall, M., López-Cózar, E. D. (2017). Do ResearchGate Scores Create Ghost Academic Reputations? Scientometrics, 112(1): 443-460.
Ovadia, S. (2014). ResearchGate and Academia.edu: Academic Social Networks. Behavioral and Social Sciences Librarian, 33(3): 165-169.
Reza, A.A., Maryam, S., Mehdi, S.B., Abedin, H.A.S. (2015). Presence of Ahavz Universities (Medical Science, Azad and Governmental) Scholars Iranian Library and Information Science Scholars in Academic Social Networks: ResearchGate. Educational Development of Jundishapur, 6(1): 67 – 73.
Thelwall, M., Kousha, K. (2015). ResearchGate: Disseminating, Communicating, and Measuring Scholarship? Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(5): 876-889.
Thelwall, M., Kousha, K. (2017). ResearchGate articles: Age, Discipline, Audience Size, and Impact. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(2): 468-479.
Van Noorden, R. (2014). Online collaboration: Scientists and the Social Networks. Nature, 512(7513): 126-129.
Yu, M.-Ch., Wu, Y.-Ch.J., Alhalabi, W.,Kao, H.-Y. (2016). ResearchGate:An Effective Altmetric Indicator for Active Researchers? Computer in Human Behavior, 55: 1001 – 1006.
Downloads
Publicado
2018-06-29
Como Citar
Moskovkin, V. M., Sadovski, M. V., Peresypkin, A. P., & Genkin, Y. Y. (2018). Monitoramento de downloads de publicações de cientistas da Universidade Estadual de Belgorod (Rússia) por cientistas de outros países. Amazonia Investiga, 7(14), 218–227. Recuperado de https://amazoniainvestiga.info/index.php/amazonia/article/view/509
Edição
Seção
Articles
.gif)
