Seguimiento de las descargas de publicaciones científicas de la Universidad Estatal de Belgorod (Rusia) por científicos de otros países
Palabras clave:
Actividad de publicación, la Universidad Estatal de Belgorod, Rusia, matriz de correlación cruzada, RG-metrics, RG Score, ResearchGate, Google Scholar.Resumen
El artículo presenta una revisión sobre el funcionamiento de la red ResearchGate y el crecimiento de su popularidad tanto a partir de los datos literarios como de los experimentos en el motor de búsqueda Google Scholar. Describe experimentos únicos de monitoreo semanales de descargas de publicaciones de científicos de la Universidad Estatal de Belgorod (Rusia) por científicos de otros países (desde el 11.01.2015 hasta el 20.12.2015), y se muestra que científicos de los Estados Unidos (aproximadamente 10.000 descargas) en 2015) y China (aproximadamente 6.000 descargas en 2015) están más interesados en estas publicaciones. Como resultado, vemos una distribución muy desigual de casillas inversas de las publicaciones de la Universidad Estatal de Belgorod por países del mundo. El número total de países parecía ser 91.
Descargas
Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.
Citas
Alheyasat, O. (2015). Examination Expertise Sharing in Academic Social Networks Using Graphs: The Case of ResearchGate, Contempory Engineering Science, 8(3): 137-151.
Alheyasat, O. (2016). Investigation and Analysis of ResearchGate User’s Activities using Neural Networks. The International Arab Journal of Information Technology, 13(2): 320 – 325.
Guskov, A.E., Kosyakov, D.V., Grigoriev, A.V., Sergeev, A.E. (2018). Ispolzuyut li rossiyskie uchenye sovremennye technologii nauchnyh kommunikatsyi? (Do Russian scientists use modern technologies of scientific communications?). Vestnik Novosibirsk State University. Informatsyonnye tehnologii, 16(1): 74-84 (In Russian).
Hoffmann, C. P., Lutz, C., Meckel, M. A. (2016). Relational Altmetric? Network Centrality on ResearchGate as an Indicator of Scientific Impact. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(4): 765-775.
Kraker, P., Lex, E. A Critical. (2015). Look at the ResearchGate Score as a Measure of Scientific Reputation. Proceedings of the Quantifying and Analysing Scholarly Communication on the Web workshop (ASCW’15), Web Science conference.
Memon, A. R. (2016). ResearchGate is no Longer Reliable: Leniency towards Ghost Journals May Decrease its Impact on the Scientific Community J Pak Med Assoc, 66(12): 1643-1647.
Moskovkin, V.M., Peresypkin A.P., Pupynina, E.V. (2013). Izuchenie osobennostey mezhdunarodnyh praktik po vyplate voznagrazgdeniy za nauchnye publikatsii c pomotschyu platformy ResearchGate i personalnoi kommunikatsii. Predvoritelnye resultaty (The study of international practicies of rewards for scientific publications with the help of ResearchGate platform and through personal communication). Belgorod State University Scientific Bulletin. Philosophy. Sociology. Law, 25 (16 (159)): 257-261 (In Russian).
Nicholas, D., Herman, E., Jamali, H. R., Bravo, B. R., Boukacem-Zeghmouri, C., Dobrowolski, T., Pouchot, S. (2015). New ways of building, showcasing, and measuring scholarly reputation. Learned publishing, 28(3): 169-183.
Orduna-Malea, E., Martín-Martín, A., Thelwall, M., López-Cózar, E. D. (2017). Do ResearchGate Scores Create Ghost Academic Reputations? Scientometrics, 112(1): 443-460.
Ovadia, S. (2014). ResearchGate and Academia.edu: Academic Social Networks. Behavioral and Social Sciences Librarian, 33(3): 165-169.
Reza, A.A., Maryam, S., Mehdi, S.B., Abedin, H.A.S. (2015). Presence of Ahavz Universities (Medical Science, Azad and Governmental) Scholars Iranian Library and Information Science Scholars in Academic Social Networks: ResearchGate. Educational Development of Jundishapur, 6(1): 67 – 73.
Thelwall, M., Kousha, K. (2015). ResearchGate: Disseminating, Communicating, and Measuring Scholarship? Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(5): 876-889.
Thelwall, M., Kousha, K. (2017). ResearchGate articles: Age, Discipline, Audience Size, and Impact. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(2): 468-479.
Van Noorden, R. (2014). Online collaboration: Scientists and the Social Networks. Nature, 512(7513): 126-129.
Yu, M.-Ch., Wu, Y.-Ch.J., Alhalabi, W.,Kao, H.-Y. (2016). ResearchGate:An Effective Altmetric Indicator for Active Researchers? Computer in Human Behavior, 55: 1001 – 1006.
Alheyasat, O. (2016). Investigation and Analysis of ResearchGate User’s Activities using Neural Networks. The International Arab Journal of Information Technology, 13(2): 320 – 325.
Guskov, A.E., Kosyakov, D.V., Grigoriev, A.V., Sergeev, A.E. (2018). Ispolzuyut li rossiyskie uchenye sovremennye technologii nauchnyh kommunikatsyi? (Do Russian scientists use modern technologies of scientific communications?). Vestnik Novosibirsk State University. Informatsyonnye tehnologii, 16(1): 74-84 (In Russian).
Hoffmann, C. P., Lutz, C., Meckel, M. A. (2016). Relational Altmetric? Network Centrality on ResearchGate as an Indicator of Scientific Impact. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(4): 765-775.
Kraker, P., Lex, E. A Critical. (2015). Look at the ResearchGate Score as a Measure of Scientific Reputation. Proceedings of the Quantifying and Analysing Scholarly Communication on the Web workshop (ASCW’15), Web Science conference.
Memon, A. R. (2016). ResearchGate is no Longer Reliable: Leniency towards Ghost Journals May Decrease its Impact on the Scientific Community J Pak Med Assoc, 66(12): 1643-1647.
Moskovkin, V.M., Peresypkin A.P., Pupynina, E.V. (2013). Izuchenie osobennostey mezhdunarodnyh praktik po vyplate voznagrazgdeniy za nauchnye publikatsii c pomotschyu platformy ResearchGate i personalnoi kommunikatsii. Predvoritelnye resultaty (The study of international practicies of rewards for scientific publications with the help of ResearchGate platform and through personal communication). Belgorod State University Scientific Bulletin. Philosophy. Sociology. Law, 25 (16 (159)): 257-261 (In Russian).
Nicholas, D., Herman, E., Jamali, H. R., Bravo, B. R., Boukacem-Zeghmouri, C., Dobrowolski, T., Pouchot, S. (2015). New ways of building, showcasing, and measuring scholarly reputation. Learned publishing, 28(3): 169-183.
Orduna-Malea, E., Martín-Martín, A., Thelwall, M., López-Cózar, E. D. (2017). Do ResearchGate Scores Create Ghost Academic Reputations? Scientometrics, 112(1): 443-460.
Ovadia, S. (2014). ResearchGate and Academia.edu: Academic Social Networks. Behavioral and Social Sciences Librarian, 33(3): 165-169.
Reza, A.A., Maryam, S., Mehdi, S.B., Abedin, H.A.S. (2015). Presence of Ahavz Universities (Medical Science, Azad and Governmental) Scholars Iranian Library and Information Science Scholars in Academic Social Networks: ResearchGate. Educational Development of Jundishapur, 6(1): 67 – 73.
Thelwall, M., Kousha, K. (2015). ResearchGate: Disseminating, Communicating, and Measuring Scholarship? Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(5): 876-889.
Thelwall, M., Kousha, K. (2017). ResearchGate articles: Age, Discipline, Audience Size, and Impact. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(2): 468-479.
Van Noorden, R. (2014). Online collaboration: Scientists and the Social Networks. Nature, 512(7513): 126-129.
Yu, M.-Ch., Wu, Y.-Ch.J., Alhalabi, W.,Kao, H.-Y. (2016). ResearchGate:An Effective Altmetric Indicator for Active Researchers? Computer in Human Behavior, 55: 1001 – 1006.
Descargas
Publicado
2018-06-29
Cómo citar
Moskovkin, V. M., Sadovski, M. V., Peresypkin, A. P., & Genkin, Y. Y. (2018). Seguimiento de las descargas de publicaciones científicas de la Universidad Estatal de Belgorod (Rusia) por científicos de otros países. Amazonia Investiga, 7(14), 218–227. Recuperado a partir de https://amazoniainvestiga.info/index.php/amazonia/article/view/509
Número
Sección
Articles
.gif)
