Eficiência de uma auditoria interna dos processos de negócios das empresas

Autores

  • Regina V. Nagumanova Kazan Federal University, Institute of Management, Economics and Finance, Kazan, Russia
  • Aigyl I. Sabirova Kazan Federal University, Institute of Management, Economics and Finance, Kazan, Russia
  • Nadezhda G. Titova Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, Moscow, Russia

Palavras-chave:

Auditoria interna, processos de negócios, controle, eficiência de uma auditoria interna, negócios.

Resumo

O artigo sugere uma abordagem para avaliar a eficácia do processo de "Uma auditoria interna de processos de negócios, da compra ao pagamento", que permite monitorar visualmente a dinâmica e a realização real do processo dos indicadores especificados. Isso é explicado pelo fato de que a avaliação objetiva é obtida por meio da correlação entre os valores objetivos e planejados, o que permite determinar como a operação do processo está próxima de atingir o objetivo. É aconselhável realizar uma avaliação do funcionamento do processo de "Uma auditoria interna de processos de negócios de compra para pagamento" para realizar dois indicadores: eficácia e eficiência. Juntamente com a implementação do modelo de auditoria interna do processo de negócios, é necessário melhorar o sistema de gerenciamento de riscos, documentar os principais riscos e procedimentos de controle existentes no contexto dos processos de negócios individuais.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Regina V. Nagumanova, Kazan Federal University, Institute of Management, Economics and Finance, Kazan, Russia

Kazan Federal University, Institute of Management, Economics and Finance, Kazan, Russia

Aigyl I. Sabirova, Kazan Federal University, Institute of Management, Economics and Finance, Kazan, Russia

Kazan Federal University, Institute of Management, Economics and Finance, Kazan, Russia

Nadezhda G. Titova, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, Moscow, Russia

Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, Moscow, Russia

Referências

Abdolmohammadi, M. J., DeSimone, S. M., Hsieh, T. S., & Wang, Z. (2017). Factors associated with internal audit function involvement with XBRL implementation in public companies: An international study. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 25, 45-56.

Al-Akra, M., Abdel-Qader, W., & Billah, M. (2016). Internal auditing in the Middle East and North Africa: A literature review. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 26, 13-27.

Alzeban, A., & Gwilliam, D. (2014). Factors affecting the internal audit effectiveness: A survey of the Saudi public sector. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 23(2), 74-86.

Alzeban, A., & Sawan, N. (2015). The impact of audit committee characteristics on the implementation of internal audit recommendations. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 24, 61-71.

Atiase, R. K. (1985). Predisclosure information, firm capitalization, and security price behavior around earnings announcements. Journal of Accounting Research, 21-36.

Bhushan, R. (1989). Firm characteristics and analyst following. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 11(2-3), 255-274.

Gramling, A. A., Maletta, M. J., Schneider, A., & Church, B. K. (2004). The role of the internal audit function in corporate governance: A synthesis of the extant internal auditing literature and directions for future research. Journal of Accounting literature, 23, 194.

Gros, M., Koch, S., & Wallek, C. (2017). Internal audit function quality and financial reporting: results of a survey on German listed companies. Journal of Management & Governance, 21(2), 291-329.

Ho, S., & Hutchinson, M. (2010). Internal audit department characteristics/activities and audit fees: Some evidence from Hong Kong firms. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 19(2), 121-136.

Hogan, C. E., & Wilkins, M. S. (2008). Evidence on the audit risk model: Do auditors increase audit fees in the presence of internal control deficiencies?. Contemporary Accounting Research, 25(1), 219-242.

Ismagilov, I. I., & Khasanova, S. F. (2014). Rating assessment of company’s competitiveness based on fuzzy sets approach. In Albena, Bulgaria: International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conferences on social sciences and arts SGEM (pp. 473-9).

Ismagilov, I. I., & Khasanova, S. F. (2016). Algorithms of parametric estimation of polynomial trend models of time series on discrete transforms. Academy of Strategic Management Journal, 15, 20.

Mihret, D. G., & Grant, B. (2017). The role of internal auditing in corporate governance: a Foucauldian analysis. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 30(3), 699-719.

Oxner, T., Hawkins, K. W., & Rivers, R. (1995). A study of computer usage by internal auditors in Canada and the United States. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 4(1), 27-37.

PriceWaterhouseCoopers, L. L. C. (2011). The world in 2050—The accelerating shift of global economic power: Challenges and opportunities. London, UK.

Roussy, M., & Brivot, M. (2016). "Internal audit quality: a polysemous notion?" Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 29 (5), 714-738.

Scarbrough, D. P., Rama, D. V., & Raghunandan, K. (1998). Audit committee composition and interaction with internal auditing: Canadian evidence. Accounting Horizons, 12(1), 51.

Spira, L. F., & Page, M. (2003). Risk management: The reinvention of internal control and the changing role of internal audit. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 16(4), 640-661.

Downloads

Publicado

2018-12-27

Como Citar

Nagumanova, R. V., Sabirova, A. I., & Titova, N. G. (2018). Eficiência de uma auditoria interna dos processos de negócios das empresas. Amazonia Investiga, 7(17), 306–318. Recuperado de https://amazoniainvestiga.info/index.php/amazonia/article/view/359

Edição

Seção

Articles