O estado atual e problemas de comunicações científicas em russo no espaço dos países da CEI

Autores

  • Anna Maltseva Tver State University, Tver, Russian Federation
  • Elena Klyushnikova Lurye Scientific and Methodological Center for Higher School Innovative Activity, Tver, Russian Federation
  • Aleksandra Gridchina Department of public administration and law, Moscow Polytechnic University, Moscow, Russian Federation
  • Tatyana Kuzmina Department of world economy, Plekhanov Russian University of Economics, Moscow, Russian Federation
  • Angelina Petergova Department of Public administration and law, Moscow Polytechnic University, Moscow, Russian Federation

Palavras-chave:

comunicações científicas, países da CEI, russo, questionamento

Resumo

Os resultados do estudo incluem os resultados de uma pesquisa com pesquisadores dos países da CEI, que permitiu identificar a prevalência de comunicações científicas em russo nos países da CEI. As comunicações em língua russa no campo da ciência, cujas origens estão associadas aos tempos da URSS, proporcionam uma oportunidade para o desenvolvimento da integração entre os países. Como resultado do estudo, foram tiradas conclusões sobre o grau de uso da língua russa no campo da ciência em vários países da CEI, incluindo a publicação de artigos, a preparação de dissertações, a realização de conferências e a comunicação informal. Como resultado da pesquisa e do trabalho analítico dos autores, foram identificados os principais problemas associados às comunicações científicas em russo no espaço da CEI, e foram propostas medidas para sua solução.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Anna Maltseva, Tver State University, Tver, Russian Federation

Candidate of Economic Sciences, Director of Lurye Scientific and Methodological Center for Higher School Innovative Activity, Tver State University, Tver, Russian Federation

Elena Klyushnikova, Lurye Scientific and Methodological Center for Higher School Innovative Activity, Tver, Russian Federation

Senior researcher in Lurye Scientific and Methodological Center for Higher School Innovative Activity, Tver, Russian Federation

Aleksandra Gridchina, Department of public administration and law, Moscow Polytechnic University, Moscow, Russian Federation

Professor, Department of public administration and law, Moscow Polytechnic University, Moscow, Russian Federation

Tatyana Kuzmina, Department of world economy, Plekhanov Russian University of Economics, Moscow, Russian Federation

Doctor of Economics, Professor, Department of world economy, Plekhanov Russian University of Economics, Moscow, Russian Federation

Angelina Petergova, Department of Public administration and law, Moscow Polytechnic University, Moscow, Russian Federation

Associate Professor, Department of Public administration and law, Moscow Polytechnic University, Moscow, Russian Federation

Referências

Amelung, N. (2015). Same, same – but different: Public engagement devices enacted by science communication providers, in Studying Science Communication, 12-17

Born, D. (2015) Communicating science, transforming knowledge: Insights into the knowledge communication practices of the popular science magazine GEO, in Studying Science Communication, 28-33

Both, G. (2015). Youtubization of research. Enacting the high tech cowboy through video demonstrations, in Studying Science Communication, 34-27

Chernozub, S.P. (2013). Scientific Communication in Russia in the Age of Information and Communication Technologies, Social Sciences and the modernity, 6, 144-152.

Davies, S.R. (2015). Deficit, deliberation and delight: STS and science Communication, in Studying Science Communication, 7-11

Dudenkova, T.A. (2010). The main models of the relationship between the formal and the non-formal in scientific communication, News of Herzen Russian State Pedagogical University, 124.

Hetland, P. (2015). The communication of scientific knowledge: Between popularization and policy, in Studying Science Communication, 48-50

Hill, M. (2015). Embodiment of science in science slams. A case of informal public science communication, in Studying Science Communication, 18-23

Kuehne, L.M., Twardochleb, L.A., Fritschie, K.J., Mims, M.C., Lawrence, D.J., Gibson, P.P., Stewart-Koster, B., and Olden, J.D. (2014). Practical Science Communication Strategies for Graduate Students, Conservation Biology, 28(5), 1225-1235

Maltseva, A., Barsukova, N., Gridchina, A., and Kuzmina, T. (2017). Analytical review of the contemporary state of the russian scientific organizations from the development management positions, Journal of Applied Economic Sciences, 5 (51), 1531-1548

Maltseva, A., Veselov, I., Monakhov, I., and Karasyova, L. (2017). Evaluation of factors having a significant impact on the development of scientific organizations in the field of engineering, International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, 12(24), 15337-15346

Mamaeva, S.A. (2011). Communicative strategies of scientists, Scientific Periodic: Problems and Solutions, 3, 6-13.

Medin, D.L. and Bang, M. (2014). The cultural side of science communication, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(4)

Medvedeva, S.M. (2014). From scientific creativity to the popularization of science: a theoretical model of scientific communication, Bulletin of MGIMO University, 4(37), 278-284

Reshetnikova, E.V. (2014). Scientific communications: the evolution of forms, principles of organization, Siberian State University of Telecommunications and Informatics, https://sibsutis.ru/upload/publications/9b3/uxofvwfphpyfwz%20nlcieeuzqkvzohdcsxzhccdi.pdf

Rudy, A.Sh. (2012). Scientific communication and the place in it of the concept of sustainability, Omsk Scientific Bulletin, 2 (106), 115-118.

Shirokanova, A.A. (2013). New role and forms of scientific communication in the information age, Sociology, 1, 103-116.

Shubina, N.L. (2009). Scientific communication: the search for a reasonable compromise, News of Herzen Russian State Pedagogical University, 104, 87-96.

Stengler, E. (2015). Science communication in science centres and museums: Return to their core business, in Studying Science Communication, 45-47

Vasilyeva, T. (2013). Russian language in the education system of the CIS and Baltic countries, Almanac «ETHNODIALOGI», 1 (42), 52-60.

V??e, J. (2017). Motivating factors for science communication in Latvia, CBU International Conference Proceedings, Vol. 5; doi:10.12955/cbup.v5.1042

Vydrin, O.V. (2009). Scientific communication: to the research methodology, Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University, 42(180), 112-117

Zamoshchansky, I.I., Konashkova, A.M., Krasavin, I.V., Pyr'yanova, O.A. (2016). Scientific communications: a scientist in modern society, Proceedings of the Ural Federal University. Series 3: General Sciences, 146(1), 30-41.

Zubov, A. (2016). Do the Russian language is need in the CIS countries? Fund to support and protect the rights of compatriots living abroad. URL: http://pravfond.ru/?module=articles&action=view&id=2010

The concept of state support and promotion of the Russian language abroad: approved by the President of the Russian Federation 03.11.2015, No. Pr-2283. URL: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_188569/

Downloads

Publicado

2019-06-25

Como Citar

Maltseva, A., Klyushnikova, E., Gridchina, A., Kuzmina, T., & Petergova, A. (2019). O estado atual e problemas de comunicações científicas em russo no espaço dos países da CEI. Amazonia Investiga, 8(20), 432–450. Recuperado de https://amazoniainvestiga.info/index.php/amazonia/article/view/173

Edição

Seção

Articles