Factores socioculturales y psicológicos de crítica de la idea legal

Autores/as

  • Amina Ildusovna Urazova Institute of History and Public Administration, Bashkir State University, Republic of Bashkortostan, Russia. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1184-1465
  • Ksenia Vuacheslavovna Khramova Department of Philosophy and Psychology, Faculty of Dentistry, Bashkir State Medical University. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2618-7411
  • Dmitriy Valerevich Rednikov Department of Economic and Legal Security, Institute of History and Public Administration, Bashkir State University, Republic of Bashkortostan, Russia. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5878-5793
  • Zilia Nurmukhametovna Rakhmatullina Department of Ethics, Cultural Studies and Public Relations, Faculty of Philosophy and Sociology, Bashkir State University, Republic of Bashkortostan, Russia. http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0278-1045
  • Zulfiya Erkinovna Khakimova Department of Ethics, Cultural Studies and Public Relations, Faculty of Philosophy and Sociology, Bashkir State University, Republic of Bashkortostan, Russia. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6024-3974

Palabras clave:

Conciencia jurídica, el relativismo, primacía de la ley, habitualización, abstracción legal.

Resumen

La construcción legal implica la elección de un modelo legal que se forma por abstracción, es decir, la idealización del proyecto legislativo. El observatorio de este estudio es identificar los factores culturales y psicológicos de la crítica versátil de la idea de la primacía de la ley, que es la base del estado de derecho.

Metodología: con la ayuda del método específico e histórico, se analizaron las opciones para criticar la idea de la primacía de la ley desde Marx hasta la actualidad, excluyendo los conceptos de negación de ley.

Resultados: a diferencia de la crítica de Marx y Mannheim de la ley desde el punto de vista de la ideología, el principal factor espiritual de la crítica de la ley en la sociedad moderna es ignorar el papel de las condiciones socioculturales específicas que generan normas y relaciones jurídicas especiales, lo que permite posicionar estas normas y relaciones como naturales y universales. En la opción opuesta se niega la existencia de un conocimiento jurídico universal (relativismo epistémico relacionado con la relativa de la existencia de hechos jurídicos) y normas jurídicas de carácter general (relativismo moral y jurídico relacionado con la relativa de los valores de las ideas, conceptos y normas jurídicas), ya que las ideas y valores siempre dependen del punto de vista del sujeto cognitivo o moral.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Biografía del autor/a

Amina Ildusovna Urazova, Institute of History and Public Administration, Bashkir State University, Republic of Bashkortostan, Russia.

Director of the Institute of History and Public Administration, Bashkir State University, Republic of Bashkortostan, Russia.

Ksenia Vuacheslavovna Khramova, Department of Philosophy and Psychology, Faculty of Dentistry, Bashkir State Medical University.

Professor at the Department of Philosophy and Psychology, Faculty of Dentistry, Bashkir State Medical University.

Dmitriy Valerevich Rednikov, Department of Economic and Legal Security, Institute of History and Public Administration, Bashkir State University, Republic of Bashkortostan, Russia.

Senior Lecturer at the Department of Economic and Legal Security, Institute of History and Public Administration, Bashkir State University, Republic of Bashkortostan, Russia.

Zilia Nurmukhametovna Rakhmatullina, Department of Ethics, Cultural Studies and Public Relations, Faculty of Philosophy and Sociology, Bashkir State University, Republic of Bashkortostan, Russia.

Doctoral Candidate at the Department of Ethics, Cultural Studies and Public Relations, Faculty of Philosophy and Sociology, Bashkir State University, Republic of Bashkortostan, Russia.

Zulfiya Erkinovna Khakimova, Department of Ethics, Cultural Studies and Public Relations, Faculty of Philosophy and Sociology, Bashkir State University, Republic of Bashkortostan, Russia.

Graduate Student at the Department of Ethics, Cultural Studies and Public Relations, Faculty of Philosophy and Sociology, Bashkir State University, Republic of Bashkortostan, Russia.

Citas

Afridi, M. (2017). PPPs in global education policy: Looking at the case of the Egyptian education initiative. In: R.M. Elmesky, C.C. Yeakey, O. Marcucci (eds.), The Power of Resistance: Advances in Education in Diverse Communities (vol. 12, pp. 165–188). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-358X20140000012009.

Akimova, Yu.A. (2018). Konstitutsionnaya kontseptsiya gendernogo ravnopraviya [The constitutional concept of gender equality]. Moscow: Institut dopolnitel'nogo professional'nogo obrazovaniya rabotnikov sotsial'noy sfery.

Amhlaigh, Mac C. (2016). Harmonising global constitutionalism. Global Constitutionalism, 5(2), 173-206. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045381716000125.

Anderson, P. (1974). Lineages of the absolutist state. London: New Left Books.

Daum C., Ishiwata E. (2010). From the myth of formal equality to the politics of social justice: race and the legal attack on native entitlements. Law & Society Review, 44(3), 843–875. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5893.2010.00424.x

Engels, F. (2002). Engels to Conrad Schmidt in Berlin (1890). Marx and Engels Correspondence. Trans. D. Torr. Loondon: International Publishers. https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1890/letters/90_10_27.htm

Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: the Birth of the Prison. New York: Random House.

Frolova, I. V. (2018). Setevaya identichnost' sovremennogo cheloveka: Filosofskaya refleksiya [The network identity of modern man: Philosophical reflection]. Tsennosti i Smysly [Values and Meanings], 2(54), 26-38. https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=35103963

Furqan, A.C., & Din, M. (2019). Social perception on corruption and its influence on public legitimacy and open government (Indonesia). Revista Espacios, 40(13), 13. https://www.revistaespacios.com/a19v40n13/a19v40n13p13.pdf

Hobbes, T. (2012). Leviathan, Critical edition by Noel Malcolm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Khan, Z. (2018). Islam and the United States supreme court: Problems of history, otherness, and legal recognition. Asian American Law Journal, 25(1), 21–87. https://scholarship.law.berkeley.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1234&context=aalj

Mannheim, K. (1945). Diagnosis of our time. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co., Ltd.

Marchetti, E., & Ransley, J. (2005). Unconscious racism: scrutinizing judicial reasoning in ‘stolen generation’ cases. Social & Legal Studies, 14(4), 533–552. https://doi.org/10.1177/0964663905057659.

Marx, K. (2004). The German Ideology. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.

Marx, K., & Engels, F. (2014). The Communist Manifesto. London: Penguin Classics.

Oberoi, R. (2017). State, sovereignty, and private regulation: Problématique and explanandum of emerging global governance matrix. In: D. Crowther, S. Seifi (eds.), Modern Organisational Governance: Developments in Corporate Governance and Responsibility (vol. 12, pp. 17–46). Emerald Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2043-052320170000012002

Pashukanis, E.B. (1980). The general theory of law and Marxism. In: P. Beirne and R. Sharlet (eds.), Selected Writings on Marxism and Law (pp. 32-131). London: OUP. https://www.marxists.org/archive/pashukanis/1924/law/.

Sirazetdinova, M.F., & Lukmanova, R.Kh. (2016). Osobennosti manipulyatsii soznaniyem v sfere prava [Specifics of consciousness manipulation in the legal sphere]. Eurasian Law Journal, 5(96), 373–376. https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=26289563

Stoletov, A., Lukmanova, R., Sirazetdinova, M., Khramova, K., & Afanasyeva, O. (2019). How extensive creativity is related to the escalation of violence in art? Creativity Studies, 12(2), 246–257. https://doi.org/10.3846/cs.2019.9434

United Nations General Assembly. (1948). The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR). https://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/

Wilkinson, M.A. (2019). Authoritarian liberalism in Europe: A common critique of neoliberalism and ordoliberalism. Critical Sociology. https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920519837325,(089692051983732)

Descargas

Publicado

2019-10-11

Cómo citar

Urazova, A. I., Khramova, K. V., Rednikov, D. V., Rakhmatullina, Z. N., & Khakimova, Z. E. (2019). Factores socioculturales y psicológicos de crítica de la idea legal. Amazonia Investiga, 8(23), 678–684. Recuperado a partir de https://amazoniainvestiga.info/index.php/amazonia/article/view/919

Número

Vol. 8 Núm. 23 (2019)

Sección

Articles