Discurso religioso y moral de F.M. Dostoevsky y el cuento de nuestro tiempo por M.M. Prishvin

Autores/as

  • Aleksandr Modestovich Podoksenov Department of Philosophy and Social Sciences, Bunin Yelets State University, Russian Federation, Lipetsk region, Yelets https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6405-6140
  • Valentina Alekseevna Telkova Department of Russian Language, Methodology, Methods of Teaching and Document Management, Bunin Yelets State University, Russian Federation, Lipetsk region, Yelets https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5738-3143

Palabras clave:

Prishvin, Dostoievski, ideología, religión, revolución, bolchevismo, gran guerra patriótica.

Resumen

Este estudio tiene como objetivo analizar los contextos históricos y culturales de las opiniones del escritor ruso y soviético Mikhail Mikhailovich Prishvin (1873-1954) sobre la posibilidad de realizar el ideal de la caridad como una virtud teológica en la sociedad soviética, incluso en las condiciones de ateísmo militante y Las crueldades de la Gran Guerra Patria en curso. El estudio es relevante para la Rusia moderna debido a las circunstancias históricas, que desde 1917 hasta principios de la década de 1990, casi toda la vida cultural del país estuvo bajo la presión de la ideología comunista. La reconstrucción histórica y filosófica sirve como los principales enfoques de estudio para este problema. Al comparar las evaluaciones ideológicas y estéticas del movimiento revolucionario de Dostoievski y Prishvin, establecemos el metatexto, cuyo análisis nos permite comprender mejor cómo Prishvin comprendió las leyes y tendencias básicas del desarrollo de la existencia y la conciencia social en su tiempo. El documento muestra que la razón principal de la atracción de Prishvin por Dostoievski es la cercanía de sus puntos de vista sobre la vida y el reconocimiento de la supremacía de las leyes morales en la estructura de la existencia humana. La novedad de este estudio radica en el análisis del contexto filosófico e ideológico de los pensamientos de Prishvin sobre las formas de superar la discordia espiritual en la sociedad rusa cuando la cosmovisión cristiana ortodoxa sostenida por un segmento significativo de la población entró en conflicto con la ideología del bolchevismo. A través de sus héroes ficticios, el escritor muestra que en el año de la invasión fascista, la vida misma demostró el triunfo de la fe ortodoxa, a la que el pueblo ruso permaneció fiel a pesar de la presión del amenazante estado ateo. La historia parece resumir el viaje de vida de Prishvin a medida que las opiniones religiosas del escritor se hicieron cada vez más importantes para su cosmovisión.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Biografía del autor/a

Aleksandr Modestovich Podoksenov, Department of Philosophy and Social Sciences, Bunin Yelets State University, Russian Federation, Lipetsk region, Yelets

Doctor of Philosophy, Professor of the Department of Philosophy and Social Sciences, Bunin Yelets State University, Russian Federation, Lipetsk region, Yelets

Valentina Alekseevna Telkova, Department of Russian Language, Methodology, Methods of Teaching and Document Management, Bunin Yelets State University, Russian Federation, Lipetsk region, Yelets

Candidate of Philological Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Russian Language, Methodology, Methods of Teaching and Document Management, Bunin Yelets State University, Russian Federation, Lipetsk region, Yelets

Citas

Babuk, A. (2015). The Myth of Childhood as an Embodiment of the Golden Age in Dostoevsky’s Oeuvre. Russian Studies in Literature, 51(2), pp. 33-53.

Barsht, K.A. (2019). “...Was Passing in Blessing, the Pope Antichrist”. About One Paradoxical Wording in the Preparatory Materials for F.M. Dostoevsky’s Novel “The Possesed. New philological bulletin, 49, pp. 116-130.

Barsht, K.A. (2018). Theorem on “People of Two Kinds” (Crime and Punishment by F.M. Dostoevsky): Six Probable Sources. Zbornik matice srpske za slavistiku-matica srpska journal of Slavic studies, 93, pp. 301-319.

Batalova, T.P. (2017). The Poetics of the “Epilogue” in the Novel “The Brothers Karamazov” by F.M. Dostoevsky. Problems of the Historical Poetics, 15(3), pp. 94-108.

Bogdanova, O. (2016). F.M. Dostoevsky through the Prism of Revolutionary Journalism by D.S. Merezhkovsky, 1905-1921. New philological bulletin, 38, pp. 80-94.

Borisova, V.V. (2019). Epistolary of F.M. Dostoevsky During the Period of Katorga and Exile: Salvation Code. Philological class, 55(1), pp. 23-27.

Chernyshov, I.S. (2018). The Lifetime Critics of “The Possessed” by F.M. Dostoevsky in the Context of Author’s Strategy of Edition. New philological bulletin, 46, pp. 124-136.

Chernyshov, I.S. (2017). The Publishing Strategies of the Novel “The Possessed” by F.M. Dostoevsky in Post-Soviet Russia. Philological class, 49(3), pp. 101-108.

Dostoevsky, F.M. (1981). A Writer’s Diary. 1876. May-October. Complete set of works in 30 vol. Vol. 23. Leningrad: Science.

Dostoevsky, F.M. (1982). A Writer’s Diary. 1876. November-December. Complete set of works in 30 vol. Vol. 24. Leningrad: Science.

Dostoevsky, F.M. (1984a). A Writer’s Diary. 1877. September-December. August 1880. Complete set of works in 30 vol. Vol. 26. Leningrad: Science.

Dostoevsky, F.M. (1984b). A Writer’s Diary. 1881. Autobiographical. Dubia. Complete set of works in 30 vol. Vol. 27. Leningrad: Science.

Dostoevsky, F.M. (1980). Articles and Notes. 1862–1865. Collected edition in 30 vol. Vol. 20. Leningrad: Science.

Dostoevsky F.M. (1988). Letter to Blagonravov A.F. December 19th 1880. Complete set of works in 30 vol. Vol. 30 (1). Letters 1878-1881. Leningrad: Science.

Dostoevsky, F.M. (1985). Letters 1832-1859. Complete set of works in 30 vol. Vol. 28(1). Leningrad: Science.

Dostoevsky F.M. (1974). The Possessed. Complete set of works in 30 vol. Vol. 10. Leningrad: Science.

Dyogteva, Y.N. (2018). The Other View on the Novel “Crime and Punishment” by F.M. Dostoevsky. Philological class, 53(3), pp. 124-129.

Givens, J. (2015). Dostoevsky; Herzen Versus Chernyshevsky. Russian Studies in Literature, 51(2), pp. 1-5.

Kelly, M.R. (2017). Kaleidoscope: F.M. Dostoevsky and the Early Dialectical Theology. Russian review, 76(1), pp. 142-142.

Kibalnik, S.A. (2018). The Dispute About Church Court in the Novel “The Brothers Karamazov” (F.M. Dostoevsky and V.S. Solov’yov). Problems of the Historical Poetics, 16(2), pp. 140-157.

Kladova, N.A. (2017). The Philosophical Depth of the Concept of Relationship in the Art World of the Novel F.M. Dostoevsky “The Idiot”. Philological Sciences – scientific essays of higher education, 6, pp. 66-73.

Logvinenko, S.V. (2015). “Christian socialism”: the Fate of Russia in M.M. Prishvin’s Novel “Tsar’s road”. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(4).

Lotarev, K.A., Kuznetsov, O.V. (2015). The Revolutionary Movement in the Evaluation of F.M. Dostoevsky: To Understand Conservatism in the Political History of Russia. Former Years, 38(4), pp. 1069-1077.

Podoksenov, A.M. (2016). Ideas of F.M. Dostoevsky in the Context of M. Prishvin’s Worldview Formation at the Turn of 19-20th Centuries. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 9(36).

Podoksenov, A.M. (2015). Theme of the Revolution in the Artistic Discourse of Mikhail Prishvin. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 8(10).

Prishvin, M.M. (1994). Diaries. 1918-1919. Moscow: Moscow Laborer.

Prishvin, M.M. (2003). Diaries. 1926-1927. Moscow: Russian Book.

Prishvin, M.M. (2010a). Diaries. 1936-1937. St Petersburg: Rostok.

Prishvin, M.M. (2010b). Diaries. 1938-1939. St Petersburg: Rostok.

Prishvin, M.M. (2012). Diaries. 1940-1941. Moscow: Russian Political Encyclopedia (ROSSPEN).

Prishvin, M.M. (2013). Diaries. 1944-1945. Moscow: New Chronograph.

Prishvin, M.M. (2007). Early Diary. 1905-1913. St Petersburg: Rostok.

Prishvin, M.M. (1983a). Homeland of the Crane. Collected edition in 8 vol. Vol. 3. Moscow: General Fiction.

Prishvin, M.M. (1983b). The Tale of Our Time. Collected edition in 8 vol. Vol. 5. Moscow: General Fiction.

Prishvin, M.M. (2004). Vagrant Prayer (The Will of People. 1917. St Petersburg: Rostok.

Prishvina, V.D. (1981). The Circle of Life. Essays about Prishvin M.M. Moscow: General Fiction.

Razumov, A. (2015). The Secret of Dmitri Karamazov’s Money. Russian Studies in Literature, 51(2), pp. 54-65.

Saisu, N. (2019). Saint Tikhon of Zadonsk and F.M. Dostoevsky: Problem of Finding Faith and Theme of Mentoring in “The Life of a Great Sinner”. Scientific Dialogue, 5, pp. 213-227.

Saraskina, L. (2017). The Phantom of Repention of Rodion Raskol’nikov in Contemporary Adaptations of F.M. Dostoevsky’s Novel “Crime and Punishment”. Journal of Slavic Studies, 16, pp. 364-372.

Solov’yov, V.S. (1992). The Russian Idea. Moscow: Republic.

Descargas

Publicado

2019-10-11

Cómo citar

Podoksenov, A. M., & Telkova, V. A. (2019). Discurso religioso y moral de F.M. Dostoevsky y el cuento de nuestro tiempo por M.M. Prishvin. Amazonia Investiga, 8(23), 497–505. Recuperado a partir de https://amazoniainvestiga.info/index.php/amazonia/article/view/896

Número

Sección

Articles