Régimen político de la Rusia moderna: factores de transformación y trampas institucionales
Palabras clave:
Neoinstitucionalismo, régimen político, instituciones políticas, trampas institucionales, instituciones provisionales, ambiente institucional, regímenes políticos híbridos.Resumen
La posibilidad de aplicar una teoría neoinstitucional en el estudio de regímenes políticos híbridos ha sido estudiada en el artículo. Los autores utilizan la teoría de las "trampas institucionales" del académico V. Polterovich para analizar el estado del régimen político postsoviético. Los autores han identificado seis trampas institucionales que penetran en el régimen político híbrido en la etapa actual (la trampa de "separación de poderes", la trampa de "libertad de reunión", la trampa de "libertad de expresión", la trampa de "legislatura", el " "trampa de la región electoral, la trampa del" federalismo ") y han dado una característica de cada uno de ellos. En conclusión, los autores han definido el marco general y los conceptos de metodología y han llegado a la conclusión sobre la ventaja de utilizar la metodología del neoinstitucionalismo para estudiar regímenes políticos híbridos.
Descargas
Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.
Citas
Acemoglu, D., Robinson, J. (2017). Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty. ?oscow: Eksmo.
Arendt, H. (1996). The Origins of Totalitarianism. Moscow: CentrCom.
Belyaeva, L.A. (2011). Dinamika otnosheniya rossiyan k sotsialno-ekonomicheskim i politicheskim izmeneniyam [Dynamics of the attitude of Russians to socioeconomic and political changes]. Sociological studies, 10, 11–25.
Butko, Lyutmila; Makogon, Boris; Nifanov, Aleksei; Poluhin, Oleg; Tychinin, Sergey. La formalización del territorio en las Constituciones de los países CEI. Revista Científica del Amazonas. Vol. 2, Núm. 3, 2019, 47-55.
Dahl, R.A. (2010). Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. Moscow: Phoenix.
Galkin, A.A., Krasin, Yu.A. (1998). Rossiya na pereputye. Avtoritarizm ili demokratiya: varianty razvitiya [Russia at a crossroads. Authoritarianism or democracy: development options]. Moscow: ISPRAN, Publishing House All World.
Huntington, S. (2003). The Clash of Civilizations. Moscow: Publishing house AST LLC.
Klyamkin, I.M., Lapkin, V.V., Pantin, V.I. (1995). Mezhdu avtoritarizmom i demokratiyey [Between authoritarianism and democracy]. Polis, 2, 57–87.
Krasin, Yu.A. (2003). Politicheskoy samoopredeleniye Rossii: problemy vybora [Political self-determination of Russia]: problems of choice. Polis, 1, 124–133.
Levada, Yu. (1995). Mezhdu avtoritarizmom i anarkhiyey: rossiyskaya demokratiya v glazakh obshchestvennogo mneniya [Between authoritarianism and anarchy: Russian democracy in the eyes of the public opinion]. Economic and social change: monitoring public opinion, 2, 723.
Levada, Yu. (2000). Obshchestvennoye mneniye na perelome epokh: ozhidaniya, opaseniya, ramki. K sotsiologii politicheskogo perekhoda [Public opinion at the turn of the era: expectations, fears, frameworks. To the sociology of political transition]. Economic and social changes: monitoring public opinion, 3, 7–18.
Levada, Yu. (2006). Chelovek nedovolnyy? [Dissatisfied people?]. Bulletin of public opinion, 5, 12–17.
Lijphart, A. (1997). Democracy in Plural Societies. Moscow: Aspect Press.
List of deputy associations of the State Duma of Russia. (2019). URL: https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A1%D0%BF%D0%B8%D1%81%D0%BE%D0%BA_
%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BF%D1%83%D1%82%D0%B0%D1%82%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B8%D1%85_%D0%BE%D0%B1%D1%8A%D0%B5%D0%B4%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B9_%D0%93%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%83%D0%B4%D0%B0%D1%80%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B2%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B9_%D0%B4%D1%83%D0%BC%D1%8B_%D0%A0%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%81%D0%B8%D0%B8
Mogilevskaya, A. (2017). Krupneyshiye dotatsii iz byudzheta poluchat Dagestan, Chechnya i Kamchatka [Dagestan, Chechnya, and Kamchatka will receive the largest budget subsidies]. URL: https://www.rbc.ru/economics/11/10/2017/59db751d9a794738f67da77e
O'Donnell, G. (1994). Delegative Democracy. 20th century and world, 7–8, 54 – 57.
Rodrik, D (2008). Second-best institutions. NBER Working Paper No. 14050.
Russian Federation. Laws. On gatherings, meetings, demonstrations, and pickets: Federal Law No. 54-FZ dated 19.06.2004.
Russian Federation. President (2018 – 2024; V.V. Putin). On assessing the efficiency of the activities of senior officials (heads of the highest executive bodies of the state authorities) in the regions of the Russian Federation and the activities of executive bodies in the regions of the Russian Federation. Decree of the President of the Russian Federation No. 193 dated 25.04.2019.
Rutkevich, M.N. (2001). Obshchestvo kak sistema. Sotsiologicheskiye ocherki [Society as a system. Sociological essays]. Saint Petersburg: Alethea.
Schmitter, P. (1996). Some Propositions about Civil Society and the Consolidation of Democracy. Polis, 5, 16 – 27.
Shevtsova, L.F. (2004). Smena Rezhima ili Sistemy? [Change of a regime or a system?]. Polis, 1, 46–51.
Sogrin, V.V. (2001). Politicheskaya istoriya sovremennoy Rossii [Political history of the modern Russia]. 1982 – 2001: from Gorbachev to Putin. Moscow.
Zaslavskaya, T.I. (2004). Sovremennoye rossiyskoye obshchestvo: Sotsialnyy mekhanizm transformatsii [Contemporary Russian society: Social transformation mechanism]. Moscow: Delo.
Zaslavskaya, T.P. (2002). O sotsialnom mekhanizme postkommunisticheskikh preobrazovaniy v Rossii [On the social mechanism of post-communist transformations in Russia]. Sociological studies, 8, 317.
Arendt, H. (1996). The Origins of Totalitarianism. Moscow: CentrCom.
Belyaeva, L.A. (2011). Dinamika otnosheniya rossiyan k sotsialno-ekonomicheskim i politicheskim izmeneniyam [Dynamics of the attitude of Russians to socioeconomic and political changes]. Sociological studies, 10, 11–25.
Butko, Lyutmila; Makogon, Boris; Nifanov, Aleksei; Poluhin, Oleg; Tychinin, Sergey. La formalización del territorio en las Constituciones de los países CEI. Revista Científica del Amazonas. Vol. 2, Núm. 3, 2019, 47-55.
Dahl, R.A. (2010). Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. Moscow: Phoenix.
Galkin, A.A., Krasin, Yu.A. (1998). Rossiya na pereputye. Avtoritarizm ili demokratiya: varianty razvitiya [Russia at a crossroads. Authoritarianism or democracy: development options]. Moscow: ISPRAN, Publishing House All World.
Huntington, S. (2003). The Clash of Civilizations. Moscow: Publishing house AST LLC.
Klyamkin, I.M., Lapkin, V.V., Pantin, V.I. (1995). Mezhdu avtoritarizmom i demokratiyey [Between authoritarianism and democracy]. Polis, 2, 57–87.
Krasin, Yu.A. (2003). Politicheskoy samoopredeleniye Rossii: problemy vybora [Political self-determination of Russia]: problems of choice. Polis, 1, 124–133.
Levada, Yu. (1995). Mezhdu avtoritarizmom i anarkhiyey: rossiyskaya demokratiya v glazakh obshchestvennogo mneniya [Between authoritarianism and anarchy: Russian democracy in the eyes of the public opinion]. Economic and social change: monitoring public opinion, 2, 723.
Levada, Yu. (2000). Obshchestvennoye mneniye na perelome epokh: ozhidaniya, opaseniya, ramki. K sotsiologii politicheskogo perekhoda [Public opinion at the turn of the era: expectations, fears, frameworks. To the sociology of political transition]. Economic and social changes: monitoring public opinion, 3, 7–18.
Levada, Yu. (2006). Chelovek nedovolnyy? [Dissatisfied people?]. Bulletin of public opinion, 5, 12–17.
Lijphart, A. (1997). Democracy in Plural Societies. Moscow: Aspect Press.
List of deputy associations of the State Duma of Russia. (2019). URL: https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A1%D0%BF%D0%B8%D1%81%D0%BE%D0%BA_
%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BF%D1%83%D1%82%D0%B0%D1%82%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B8%D1%85_%D0%BE%D0%B1%D1%8A%D0%B5%D0%B4%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B9_%D0%93%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%83%D0%B4%D0%B0%D1%80%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B2%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B9_%D0%B4%D1%83%D0%BC%D1%8B_%D0%A0%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%81%D0%B8%D0%B8
Mogilevskaya, A. (2017). Krupneyshiye dotatsii iz byudzheta poluchat Dagestan, Chechnya i Kamchatka [Dagestan, Chechnya, and Kamchatka will receive the largest budget subsidies]. URL: https://www.rbc.ru/economics/11/10/2017/59db751d9a794738f67da77e
O'Donnell, G. (1994). Delegative Democracy. 20th century and world, 7–8, 54 – 57.
Rodrik, D (2008). Second-best institutions. NBER Working Paper No. 14050.
Russian Federation. Laws. On gatherings, meetings, demonstrations, and pickets: Federal Law No. 54-FZ dated 19.06.2004.
Russian Federation. President (2018 – 2024; V.V. Putin). On assessing the efficiency of the activities of senior officials (heads of the highest executive bodies of the state authorities) in the regions of the Russian Federation and the activities of executive bodies in the regions of the Russian Federation. Decree of the President of the Russian Federation No. 193 dated 25.04.2019.
Rutkevich, M.N. (2001). Obshchestvo kak sistema. Sotsiologicheskiye ocherki [Society as a system. Sociological essays]. Saint Petersburg: Alethea.
Schmitter, P. (1996). Some Propositions about Civil Society and the Consolidation of Democracy. Polis, 5, 16 – 27.
Shevtsova, L.F. (2004). Smena Rezhima ili Sistemy? [Change of a regime or a system?]. Polis, 1, 46–51.
Sogrin, V.V. (2001). Politicheskaya istoriya sovremennoy Rossii [Political history of the modern Russia]. 1982 – 2001: from Gorbachev to Putin. Moscow.
Zaslavskaya, T.I. (2004). Sovremennoye rossiyskoye obshchestvo: Sotsialnyy mekhanizm transformatsii [Contemporary Russian society: Social transformation mechanism]. Moscow: Delo.
Zaslavskaya, T.P. (2002). O sotsialnom mekhanizme postkommunisticheskikh preobrazovaniy v Rossii [On the social mechanism of post-communist transformations in Russia]. Sociological studies, 8, 317.
Descargas
Publicado
2019-10-11
Cómo citar
Nikotin, D. A. (2019). Régimen político de la Rusia moderna: factores de transformación y trampas institucionales. Amazonia Investiga, 8(23), 358–368. Recuperado a partir de https://amazoniainvestiga.info/index.php/amazonia/article/view/879
Número
Sección
Articles
.gif)
