Correlación de las categorías “culpa” e “injusticia” en las relaciones de protección

Autores/as

  • Irina D. Kuzmina Federal State Autonomous Institution of Higher Professional Education “Siberian Federal University”, Russia
  • Tamara V. Shepel Federal State Autonomous Institution of Higher Education "National Research Novosibirsk Research State University”, Russia
  • Galina N. Shevchenko Federal State Autonomous Institution of Higher Professional Education “Far Eastern Federal University”, Russia

Palabras clave:

Imparcialidad, injusticia, relaciones protectoras, legalidad, ilegalidad, culpabilidad, inocencia, presunción de imparcialidad, presunción de culpabilidad.

Resumen

La última década estuvo marcada por una introducción a gran escala de la categoría de "imparcialidad" en el sistema legal ruso, que ha adquirido el carácter del principio principal del derecho civil y su antípoda: la "injusticia". Esta innovación en el campo de las relaciones de protección dio lugar al problema de la injusticia con la condición de responsabilidad civil como culpabilidad del delincuente, así como el problema de la aplicación de presunciones opuestas: la presunción de imparcialidad y la presunción de culpabilidad. El objetivo del estudio es resolver estos problemas. Los autores concluyen que el derecho civil ruso implementa dos enfoques diferentes para entender la imparcialidad (injusticia): subjetivo y objetivo. La imparcialidad (injusticia) en un sentido subjetivo es una característica del lado subjetivo del comportamiento de una persona, a saber, su inocencia (culpa); la imparcialidad (injusticia) en un sentido objetivo no compite con la categoría de inocencia (culpa), ya que caracteriza el lado objetivo del comportamiento de una persona, es decir, su legalidad (ilegalidad).

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Biografía del autor/a

Irina D. Kuzmina, Federal State Autonomous Institution of Higher Professional Education “Siberian Federal University”, Russia

MD Law, Associate Professor, Federal State Autonomous Institution of Higher Professional Education “Siberian Federal University”, Russia

Tamara V. Shepel, Federal State Autonomous Institution of Higher Education "National Research Novosibirsk Research State University”, Russia

MD Law, Associate Professor, Federal State Autonomous Institution of Higher Education "National Research Novosibirsk Research State University”, Russia

Galina N. Shevchenko, Federal State Autonomous Institution of Higher Professional Education “Far Eastern Federal University”, Russia

MD Law, Professor, Federal State Autonomous Institution of Higher Professional Education “Far Eastern Federal University”, Russia

Citas

Agarkov, M. M. (2002). Problems of abuse of law in Soviet civil law. Selected works on civil law. In 2 volumes. V.II. - M.: JSC “CenterIurInfor".490.

Andreev, A. A. (2008). Eventual responsibility in civil law. Arbitration and civil procedure. 9.

Borovik, I. (2013). Bad faith means guilt. Ezh-Iurist. Legal reference system “Consultant Plus”. 10.

Bogdanov, D. E. (2012). Justice as the main beginning of the formation of an innocent tort liability. Advokat. 6, 32 - 40.

Bogdanova, E. (2010). Good faith of the parties to the contractual relationship as a condition for the protection of their subjective civil rights. Economy and law. 2, 111 - 117.

Braginskii, M. I., & Vitrianskii, V. V. (1997). Contract law: general provisions. - M.: Statut. 847.

Golubtsova, Iu. A. (2015). The legal construction of guilt in Russian civil law: author’s abstract, PhD Law. – Kazan. 30.

Civil law. (2006). In 4 volumes. V.I: General part. Chief ed. E.A. Sukhanov. - M.: Wolters Kluwer. 720.

Ioffe, O. S. (2003). Responsibility under the Soviet civil law. Selected Works: in 4 volumes. V.I .. - St. Petersburg: Publishing House “Iuridicheskii Tsentr Press". 574.

Kuznetsova, O. A. (2013). The ratio of illegality, guilt and force majeure on the example of the responsibility of the agricultural producer. Bulletin of Perm University. Jurisprudence. Legal reference system “Consultant Plus”. 2.

Kuznetsova, O. A. (2013). A case as a basis for excluding civil liability. Bulletin of Perm University. Jurisprudence. Legal reference system “Consultant Plus”. 1.

Li, Ch. (2013). The ratio of guilty and innocent responsibility in tort obligations. Vestnik VAS RF. Legal reference system "Consultant Plus". 4.

Matveev, G. K. (1955). Guilt in Soviet civil law. – Kyiv. 307.

Mikhailov, S. V. (2006). The value of the category of good faith for the obligations of relations and the consequences of the invalidity of contracts of assignment. Invalidity in civil law: problems, trends, practice: Collected papers. Ed. M.A. Rozhkov. - M.: Statut. Legal reference system “Consultant Plus”.

Nam, K. V. (2006). Grounds for recovery of damages arising from the violation of contractual obligations (comparative legal analysis). Losses and the practice of their compensation. Collected works. Ed. M.A. Rozhkov. - M.: Statut. Legal reference system “Consultant Plus”.

Novikova, T. V. (2008). Towards the question of the subjective meaning of the concept of good faith in Russian civil law. Society and Law. Legal reference system "Consultant Plus". 1.

Novitskii, I. B. (2006). The principle of good faith in the draft law of obligations. Bulletin of civil law. Legal reference system "Consultant Plus".1 (6).

Osipov, E. B. (2001). General issues of liability in civil law. Civil notes. Interuniversity collection of scientific papers - M.: Statute. 297-318.

Decision of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation No. (2013). 308-?? 14-1400 of 08.06.2016 in case No. ?20-2391/2013. Legal reference system “Consultant Plus”.

Pokrovskii, I. A. (2001). The main problems of civil law. - M.: Statut. 363.

Puginskii, B. I. (1984). The civil law means in economic relations. - M.: Legal literature. 224.

Puginskii, B. I., & Safiullin, D. N. (1991). Legal economics: problems of formation. - M.: Legal literature. 240.

Rabinovich, F. L. (1975). Guilt as the basis of contractual liability of the enterprise. - M.: Legal literature. 168.

Shepel, T. V. (2014). Guilt in civil law: legislation and civil doctrine. Bulletin of the NSU. Series: Law. 10 (2), 50 - 55.

Iurchak, E. V. (2015). Concepts of guilt in legal science. Actual problems of Russian law. Reference legal system “Consultant Plus”. 7.

Descargas

Publicado

2018-12-27

Cómo citar

Kuzmina, I. D., Shepel, T. V., & Shevchenko, G. N. (2018). Correlación de las categorías “culpa” e “injusticia” en las relaciones de protección. Amazonia Investiga, 7(17), 555–562. Recuperado a partir de https://amazoniainvestiga.info/index.php/amazonia/article/view/771

Número

Vol. 7 Núm. 17 (2018)

Sección

Articles