Grupo criminal y método grupal de cometer un delito en el derecho penal Ruso

Autores/as

  • Vladimir I. Sidorov Law faculty
  • Sergei A. Baleev Law faculty, Kazan Federal University

Palabras clave:

Instituto de asociación, grupo criminal, forma grupal de comisión de delitos, legislación penal rusa.

Resumen

En este trabajo, el estado actual del instituto de asociación en delitos se basa en el análisis de datos estadísticos que demuestran la existencia de cuestiones problemáticas en la definición de los conceptos "grupo criminal", "forma grupal de comisión de delitos", "asociación" que afecta Se considera la práctica policial.
Es necesario reconocer el aumento del peligro público de los delitos cometidos por varias personas, ya que, en tales casos, el resultado penal es una consecuencia de los esfuerzos combinados de dos o más personas. Al mismo tiempo, en la calificación de los delitos cometidos con el uso de forma grupal, existen problemas de su tratamiento legal en su comisión, tanto dentro de la asociación como más allá de sus límites.
Realizando una breve digresión histórica en el desarrollo del instituto de asociación en la legislación penal existente, analizando las opiniones de los científicos sobre la diferenciación de los conceptos "grupo criminal", "forma grupal de comisión de delitos", "sociedad", el autor del artículo demuestra su necesidad del desarrollo del concepto "forma grupal de comisión de delitos" - mediante la fijación legislativa de este concepto de la legislación penal de la Federación de Rusia. Con el fin de mejorar el instituto de asociación, se ofrece la introducción de los cambios correspondientes en la legislación penal rusa.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Biografía del autor/a

Vladimir I. Sidorov, Law faculty

Law faculty

Sergei A. Baleev, Law faculty, Kazan Federal University

Law faculty, PhD in law, Kazan Federal University

Citas

Arutyunov A.A. Partnership in crime. M.: Statute. (2013). [electronic resource]. Access from Union of Right Forces ConsultantPlus.

Badar, M. E. (2006). " Just Convict Everyone!"-Joint Perpetration: From Tadic to Stakic and Back Again. International Criminal Law Review, 6(2), 293.

Badar, M. E., & Karsten, N. (2007). Current developments at the international criminal tribunals. International Criminal Law Review, 7(1), 163.

Borovykh, L. V., & Kirova, T. A. (2018). PROFESSIONAL STATUS OF MEDICAL WORKERS IN TERMS OF CRIMINAL LAW. ???????? ??????? ???????????, 478.

Calvo-Goller, K. N. (2006). The trial proceedings of the international criminal court. ICTY and ICTR precedents, 168.

Cassese, A., Acquaviva, G., Fan, M., & Whiting, A. (2011). International criminal law: cases and commentary. Oxford University Press.

Cassese, A., Acquaviva, G., Fan, M., & Whiting, A. (2011). International criminal law: cases and commentary. Oxford University Press.

Constitucio Criminalis Theresiana order der Romisch-kaiserlihen Majestat Mania Theresia peinlich Gerichtsordnung. - Wien, 1768. - 91 rivers.

Criminal law of Russia. The general and Special speak rapidly: The textbook for higher education institutions/N. Ivanov. - M.: Examination, 2003. - 343 pages.

Criminal law of the Russian Federation. General part: The textbook practical work / Under the editorship of A.S. Mikhlin. - M.: Yurist, 2004. - 494 pages.

Criminal law. General part: The textbook / Under the general editorship of V.I. Radchenko. - M.: Yustitsinform, 2004. - 784 pages.

Galiakbarov R.R. (1973). Group crime. Constant and variable signs. - Sverdlovsk, 140 pages.

Hasibuan, A. M., Saragih, S., & Amry, Z. (2018). Development of Learning Materials Based on Realistic Mathematics Education to Improve Problem Solving Ability and Student Learning Independence. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 14(1), 243-252.

Jessberger, F., & Geneuss, J. (2008). On the Application of a Theory of Indirect Perpetration in Al Bashir: German Doctrine at The Hague?. Journal of International Criminal Justice, 6(5), 853-869.

Kadish, S. H. (1962). Some observations on the use of criminal sanctions in enforcing economic regulations. U. Chi. L. Rev., 30, 423.

Kopnin I.S. (2010). Responsibility of participants of criminal group: Law PhD. – Ryazan, 229 pages.

Kovalyov M.I. (1960). Partnership in crime: Concept of partnership. Scientific works. P.1. – Sverdlovsk. 288 pages.

Maculan, E. (2015). Judicial Definition of Torture as a Paradigm of Cross-fertilisation: Combining Harmonisation and Expansion. Nordic Journal of International Law, 84(3), 456-481.

Mälksoo, L. (2015). Russian Approaches to International Law. Oxford University Press, USA.

Maravilla, C. S. (2000). Rape as a War Crime: The Implications of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia's Decision in Prosecutor v. Kunarac, Kovac, & (and) Vukovic on International Humanitarian Law. Fla. J. Int'l L., 13, 321.

Mikheyev R.I. (1983). A criminal legal treatment of socially dangerous acts deranged at group encroachments//Current problems of fight against group crime. – Omsk, Page 1-19.

Onyinkwa, B. (2018). The Concept of “Protected Groups” Under the Genocide Convention in Relation to Developments in International Law Through Jurisprudence and Emergence of Similar Deserving Groups.

Pochinok, N. B. (2008). Contemporary Problems of Social Work. Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University, (4), 88-97.

Pochinok, N. B. (2008). Contemporary Problems of Social Work. Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University, (4), 88-97.

Prosecutor v. G.( September 2008). Katanga and M. Ngunjolo Chiu. Case N ICC-01/04-01/07. § 510.

Radzinowicz, S. L., & Turner, J. C. (Eds.). (1945). The modern approach to criminal law. Kraus reprint.

Raroga, A. (2010). Criminal law of the Russian Federation: general part.

Regushevskaya, E. (2009). Abortions and sexually transmitted infections among women in St. Petersburg in the early 2000s. Comparison by population based surveys in Estonia and Finland. Tampere University Press.

Rodley, N., & Pollard, M. (2009). The treatment of prisoners under international law. OUP Oxford.

Schabas W.A. (2006). The UN International Criminal Tribunals: The Former Yugoslavia, Rwanda and Sierra Leone. Cambridge, - 390 rubles.

Semukhina, O. B., & Reynolds, K. M. (2013). Understanding the modern Russian police. CRC Press.

Telnov P. F. (1971). Forms of partnership and qualification of crimes//USSR justice. No. 8. - Page 21-22.

Weisberg, R. (2000). Reappraising complicity. Buffalo Criminal Law Review, 4(1), 217-281.

Weller, M., Solomou, A., & Rylatt, J. W. (Eds.). (2015). The Oxford Handbook of the Use of Force in International Law. Oxford University Press.

Williamson, J. A. (2002, September). Command responsibility in the case law of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda. In Criminal Law Forum (Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 365-384). Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Yepifanova E.V. (2002). Formation and development of institute of partnership in crime in Russia: Autoref. Law PhD Thesis. – Krasnodar,24 pages.

Descargas

Publicado

2019-02-27

Cómo citar

Sidorov, V. I., & Baleev, S. A. (2019). Grupo criminal y método grupal de cometer un delito en el derecho penal Ruso. Amazonia Investiga, 8(18), 330–336. Recuperado a partir de https://amazoniainvestiga.info/index.php/amazonia/article/view/315

Número

Sección

Articles