Semantic classification of phraseological verbs in publicistic discourse of economic orientation

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2021.37.01.11

Keywords:

functional linguistics, publicistic discourse, phraseological units, phrasal verbs, pragmatics, semantic classification.

Abstract

The article examines the role of phrasal verbs in prama-semantic organisation of publicistic discourse. The relevance of this research is explained by the growing interest of linguists in the problems of using phrasal verbs in different types of discourse, as well as the poorly studied issue of phrasal verbs at the junction of economic and publicistic discourse and their pragmatic potential. The objective of he work is to demonstrate the connection between the language and the currect economic realia which constitutes the flexible nature of pragma-semantic system of discourse.
The research relies on functional-pragmatic method and component analysis. The method of continuous sampling (articles on the topic of the impact of coronavirus on the economy of different countries) was used to select the material.
On the basis of materials taken from English-language newspapers on the topic of the coronavirus impact on the economy of European countries the semantic classification of phrasal verbs was carried out, the results of which shown that the most frequent semes are «slowing down», «improvement», «novelty», «measures / actions», «refusal».
The authors conclude that the semantic classification forms the basis of communicative strategies for creating an image of various entities or people, strategies for forming a public opinion, and strategies for uniting the society. In the pragmatic system of publicistic discourse phrasal verbs are particular speech means involved in the implementation of the general communicative strategies. They are indicative of national and cultural self-identitication, the striving for economic growth and social unity in crisis conditions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Alexandra V. Radyuk, RUDN University, Moscow, Russia.

СSc in Philology, Associate Professor of Foreign Languages Department, Faculty of Economics, RUDN University, Moscow, Russia.

Antonina V. Kozubenko, RUDN University, Moscow, Russia.

MA student, RUDN University, Moscow, Russia.

References

Aleksandrova, O. V., Mendzheritskaya, E. O., & Malakhova, V. L. (2017). Dynamic changes in modern English discourse. Training, Language and Culture, 1(1), 92-106. Doi: https://doi.org/10.29366/2017tlc.1.1.6

Amosova, N.N. (2017) Fundamentals of English phraseology. Moscow: Librocom

Arutyunova, N.D. (1990). Discourse. In Linguistic Encyclopedic Dictionary (pp. 136-137). Moscow: Sovetskaia Entsiklopediia.

Baranova, L. L., & Kriakina, N. L. (2020). ‘Safe’ political discourse: Linguo-cultural and pragma-linguistic perspectives. Training, Language and Culture, 4(3), 31-42. Doi: https://doi.org/10.22363/2521-442X-2020-4-3-31-42

Gee, J.P. (2011). An introduction to discourse analysis theory and method. UK: Routledge.

Karasik, V.I. (2002). Language circle: personality, concepts, discourse. Volgograd: Peremena.

Krivtsova, T. F., & Kucheryavenko, V. V. (2019). The linguistic aspect behind the changing attitudes towards ‘globalisation’ and ‘deglobalisation’ of economic processes (a case study of the German print media). Training, Language and Culture, 3(3), 56-69. doi: https://doi.org/10.29366/2019tlc.3.3.4

Kunin, A.V. (1996) Course of Modern English Phraseology. Moscow: Vysshaya shkola Publ.

Malyuga, E., & McCarthy, M. (2018). English and Russian vague category markers in business discourse: Linguistic identity aspects. Journal of Pragmatics, 135, 39-52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.07.011

Malyuga, E., & Tomalin, B. (2014). English professional jargon in economic discourse. Journal of Language and Literature, 5(4), 172–180. Doi: 10.7813/jll.2014/5-4/38

Malyuga, E.N., & Orlova, S.N. (2017). Linguistic pragmatics of intercultural professional and business communication. Springer.

Malyuga, E.N., & Orlova, S.N. (2016). Teaching Professional English Terminology to Students of Economic Universities. In 8th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies (EDULEARN) (pp. 7236-7241). Barcelona, SPAIN.

Pinkovetskaia, I., Arbeláez Campillo, D., Rojas Bahamón, M., Gromova, T., & Nikitina, I. (2019). Female entrepreneurship development in the Russian Federation. Amazonia Investiga, 8(18), 111-118. Retrieved from https://amazoniainvestiga.info/index.php/amazonia/article/view/287

Pivonenkova, T. (2013). Semantic classification of the phrasal verbs with figurative potential. Bulletin of the Moscow State Regional University. Series: Linguistics. No. 2. Retrieved from: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/semanticheskaya-klassifikatsiya-frazovyh-glagolov-s-obraznym-potentsialom (accessed 11 January, 2021)

Ponomarenko, E.V. (2018). Factors of Business English functional efficiency. In SGEM International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conference on Social sciences and Arts. Vol. 5. ? 3.6. (pp. 209-216). Vienna: STEF technology.

Ponomarenko, E.V. (2016). Functional properties of English discourse in terms of linguosynergetics. In 3rd International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conference on Social Sciences and Arts SGEM 2016 Proceedings, Book 1, Vol. 3, (pp. 355-362). Bulgaria, Albena. DOI: 10.5593/sgemsocial2016/B13/S03.042

Povey, J. (1990). Phrasal verbs and how to use them. Moscow: Vysshaya shkola Publ.

Radyuk, A.V. (2016). Criteria of English Business Discourse Effectiveness in View of Dynamic and Systemic Approach. Vestnik Volgogradskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta - Seriya 2 -Yazykoznanie, 15 (3), 196-205.

Radyuk, A., Banshchikova, M., & Lisyutina, O. (2017). Goal setting strategy in economic discourse: prosodic peculiarities and linguodidactic aspects. In Chova, L.G.; Martinez, A.L.; Torres, I.C. (Eds.) 9th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies (EDULEARN17) (pp. 876-881). Barcelona, Spain.

Radyuk, A.V., Ivanova, M.V., Badmatsyrenova, D. A., & Makukha, V.S. (2019). Pragma-Semantic Relations in the Structure of a Business Microblog. International Journal of English Linguistics, 9(60), 392-403. DOI: 10.5539/ijel.v9n6p392

Schiffrin, D., Tannen, D., & Hamilton, H.E. (Eds.). (2005). The Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Blackwell Publishers DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470753460

Smith, L.P. (1959). English idioms (From words and idioms, studies in the English language). London: RuMoRGB.

Smirnitsky, A.I. (1998) Lexicology of the English language. Moscow: Moscow state University

Vinogradov V. V. (1977) Selected works. Lexicology and lexicography. Moscow, Nauka.

Zabolotskaya, A.R. (2015). Mastering structural, grammatical and semantical features of phrasal verbs by students of non-linguistic specialities. Philology and Culture, ? 4 (42), pp 274-278 Retrieved from: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/izuchenie-strukturno-semanticheskih-i-grammaticheskih-osobennostey-frazovyh-glagolov-angliyskogo-yazyka-studentami-neyazykovyh (accessed 12 January, 2021)

Downloads

Published

2021-03-05

How to Cite

Radyuk, A. V., & Kozubenko, A. V. (2021). Semantic classification of phraseological verbs in publicistic discourse of economic orientation. Amazonia Investiga, 10(37), 107–115. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2021.37.01.11

Issue

Section

Articles