Changing the functions of language in the modern linguistic paradigm: Influence of virtual discourse
Palavras-chave:
Gnoseological unity, Creolization, Speech message, Modern linguistic paradigm, Anthropocentric projection.Resumo
The modern linguistic paradigm in its conceptual and epistemological content represents a multi-subject system of directions united by a single methodological dominant of anthropocentrism. The priority of the anthropocentric projection in the description of the natural human language is due to the dialectic process of accumulation of linguistic knowledge, which predetermined a qualitatively new understanding of the ontology of the object under study. The principle of anthropocentrism determines the broad explanatory capabilities of modern linguistics in establishing constant units and categories mediated by the gnoseological unity of language and human. The study of the perception of verbal texts takes place within the framework of individual linguistic disciplines: text linguistics, grammar, stylistics, and psycholinguistics. However, most studies of speech messages are conducted in the context of the idealization of the object, that is, isolation from the specific situation in which the speech message is perceived. If we consider the actual functioning of a speech message, then almost always there will be a phenomenon of creolization of the verbal text. In reality, voice communication is a creolized text representing a fusion of verbal text and non-linguistic means, which include the extra-linguistic situation and paralinguistic means of oral and written speech.
Downloads
Referências
Ebzeeva Y. and Karabulatova I. (2017). Transcultural language personality: Statement of the problem and conceptual space. Man in India, 97 (23), 255-262.
Ebzeeva Y.N., Karabulatova I.S. and Snakisbaev D.A. (2018). The Problems of Transformation of the Personal Identity in a Modern Migrant. Astra Salvensis, 11 (1), 729-738.
Grushevskaya E.S., Karabulatova I.S., Fanyan N.Yu., Zelenskaya V.V. and Golubtsov S.A. (2018). Linguistic and Cultural Characteristics of Virtual Discourse in the Modern Electronic and Digital Society. Interciencia Journal, 43 (8), 194-207.
Grushevskaya T.M., Karabulatova I.S., Grushevskaya E.S., Zelenskaya V.V. and Golubtsov S.A. (2017). Post-Postmodernity. Revista de Filosofia, 85 (1), 192 -203. Hudz N. Environmental Internet discourse: genre overview. Available at: http://kpnukonf.at.ua/publ/language_units_in_text_and_discourse/
language_units_in_text_and_discourse/environmental_internet_discourse_genre_overview/4-1-0-13.
Karabulatova I.S., Lyusheva S.A., Yanguzin A.R., Setova S.A., Kotik K.N. (2018). The Transformation of the Concepts “Terror/Terrorism” in Contemporary Socio-Philosophical Discourse. Astra Salvensis, 11 (1), 739-748.
Khachmafova Z.R., Karabulatova I.S., Serebryakova S.V., Zinkovskaya A.V. and Ermakova E.N. (2017). The Specifics of an Estimate discourse of gender stereotypes in small forms of Folklore in a Network Discourse of Electronic and Information society at the Beginning of 21ct Century. Pertanika Journal of Social Science & Humanities, 25 (S) Jul., 137-150.
Lowenthal P. Computer-mediated Discourse as a New Literacy. Available at: http://patricklowenthal.com/2009/10/computer-mediated-discourse-as-a-new-literacy/.
Luchinskaya E.N., Karabulatova I.S., Zelenskaya V.V. and Golubtsov S.A. (2018). Characteristics of Image of the Russian Family in Modern Advertising Discourse. Astra Salvensis, 11 (1), 699-714. Mironov V.V. (2005). Filosofiya i metamorfozy kul'tury. Moscow. Ter-Minasova S.G. (2007). Voyna i mir yazykov i kul'tur. Moscow.
Zhokhova L. and Zhokhova N. Building features of electronic discourse. Available at: https://research-journal.org/en/psychology/osobennosti-postroeniya-elektronnogo-diskursa/.
Downloads
.gif)
