State evolution mechanism: system approach

Valentin Ya. Lyubashyts; Nikolay V. Razuvaev; Veronika B. Romanenko; Sergey S. Shestopal; L. V. Gurak

Valentin Ya. Lyubashyts South Federal University.
Nikolay V. Razuvaev North-West Institute of Management of the Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Service.
Veronika B. Romanenko Taganrog Institute of Management and Economics.
Sergey S. Shestopal Vladivostok State University of Economics and Service. (Vladivostok, Russia).
L. V. Gurak Yaroslav Mudry National Law University

Keywords: State, evolution of the state, statehood, political society, historical types of the state.

Abstract

The article describes and analyzes in detail the state evolution mechanism. The authors show that many different theories and doctrines, various schemes for typologizing the evolutionary forms of the state have been developed over the long history of the existence of legal, philosophical and political sciences. The work content includes the discussion of the difficulties of developing rigorous theories of the evolution of state forms associated with the complexity and ambiguity of particular historical processes of state formation and development.
The authors distinguish and consider the evolutionary features of the modern state, justify that the modern state as a historical type possesses a number of features that are not inherent (or partially inherent) in both the traditional and the proto-modern state, which form its evolutionary features, specificity of functioning and evolutionary transformation. In addition, the article identifies and analyzes four main innovative stages in the political and legal institutionalization of modern political domination: civil state, rule-of-law state, democratic rule-of-law state and social rule-of-law state.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Valentin Ya. Lyubashyts, South Federal University.

Doctor of Legal Sciences, Professor. Head of the Department of Theory and History of State and Law. South Federal University.

Nikolay V. Razuvaev, North-West Institute of Management of the Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Service.

Doctor of Legal Sciences, Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Civil and Labor Law, North-West Institute of Management of the Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Service.

Veronika B. Romanenko, Taganrog Institute of Management and Economics.

Candidate of Legal Sciences, Associate Professor. Taganrog Institute of Management and Economics.

Sergey S. Shestopal, Vladivostok State University of Economics and Service. (Vladivostok, Russia).

Candidate of Legal Sciences, Associate Professor. Vladivostok State University of Economics and Service. (Vladivostok, Russia).

L. V. Gurak, Yaroslav Mudry National Law University

PhD, Assistant of the Business Law Department, Yaroslav Mudry National Law University. Kharkiv, Ukraine.

References

Adams R.N., (1975). Energy and Structure. A Theory of Social Power. Austin.

Aron. (1965). Democratie et Totalitarisme. Gallimard, P. 234.

Bytyak, Y. P., Yakovyuk, I. V., Tragniuk, O., Komarova, T. V., & Shestopal, S. S. (2017). The State Sovereignty and Sovereign Rights: the Correlation Problem. Man in India, 97(23), 577-588.

Cherdantsev A.F., (1996). Theory of State and Law. Ekaterinburg, P. 27.

Denisov A.I. (1980). Theory of State and Law / Ed. by A.I. Denisov. M., 1980. P. 78.

Dyakonov I.M., (1994). Ways of History.

Ellinek G. (1903). Law in the Modern State. V. 1. General Doctrine of the State. St. Petersburg., P. 22, 186.

Fried M.H., (1967). The evolution of political society; An essay in political anthropology. New York: Random House.

General Theory of State and Law. Academic Course. V. 1 / Ed. by M.N. Marchenko. M., 2001. P. 181.

Gorodtsov V.A. (1927). Typological Method in Archeology. Ryazan, P. 3.

Gurevich A.Ya., (1990). Theory of Formations and Reality of History // Issues of Philosophy. No. 11. P. 36, 39.

Haas J. (1995). Ways to statehood // Alternative Ways of Early Statehood / Ed. by I.N. Kradin, V.A. Lynsha. Vladivistok: Dalnauka, P. 22.

Helsen G. (1946). General Theory of Law and State. Cambridge, P. 284.

Kareyev N.I. (1905), Typological and World-Historical Point of View in Studying History // In Collection: News of the St. Petersburg Polytechnic Institute (Department of Economics). V. 3. Issue 1-2. St. Petersburg, 1905. P. 71.

Korelsky V.M., Perevalov V.D., (2000). Theory of State and Law / Ed. by Professor V.M. Korelsky and Professor V.D. Perevalov. М., P. 168.

Korolev A.I., Yavich L.S., (1987). Theory of State and Law / Ed. by A.I. Korolev, L.S. Yavich. 2 nd ed. L., P. 142.

Korotaev A.V. (1991). Some Economic Prerequisites for Class Formation and Politicalogenesis // Archaic Society: Nodal Problems of the Development Sociology. М., P. 1. P. 141.

Lazarev V.V., (1996). General Theory of Law and State / Ed. by V.V. Lazarev. M., P. 287.

Lyubashits V., (2017). Sociocultural measurement of institutional and functional characteristics of public-power interactions // Lyubashits V., Mamychev A., Uvarova G., Artyukhin O. Man in India. V. 97. № 23. С. 461-470.

Lyubashits, V.Y., Mamychev, A.Y., Shalyapin, S.O., Filippova, M.K., (2016). Prognostic problems of the public and power organization of the Russian society: Archetypes and sociocultural basis of functioning and development. International Review of Management and Marketing 6 (6). P. 85-89.

Maciver R. (1964).The Modern State. Oxford, P. 342-343.

Marxist-Leninist Theory of State and Law. V. 1. Basic Institutes and Concepts. M., 1970. P. 226-227.

Matuzov N.I., Malko A.V. (2004). Theory of State and Law / Ed. by Professor N.I. Matuzov and Professor A.V. Malko. М., P. 53.

Mordovtsev Andrey Yuryevich, Mamychev Alexey Yurievich, Shestopal Sergey Stanislavovich, (2017). Essential content of Russian legal mentality // Azimuth of Scientific Research: Economics and Administration. 2017. V. 6. № 4(21)

Mordovtsev А. , Zhinkin S., Mamychev A., Yakovyuk I., Shestopal S. (2017). Legal Mentality in National Cultural Space: Characteristics of the ERA of Change (Church Schism of the 17th Century). Man in India, 97(23), 295-309.

Oberg K. (1955).Types of Social Structure Among the Lowland Tribes of South and Central America // American Anthropologist. Vol. 57. Р. 472-487.

Petrov VS, (1967). Type and Forms of State. L., P. 21.

Ross Alf., (1960). On the Concepts "State" and "State Organs" in Constitutional Law. Scandinavian Studies in Low. Vol. 5. Р. 123-124.

Rozov N. (2001). On the Way to the Well-Founded Periodizations of the World History // Time of Peace. Issue 2. Vovosibirsk, P. 62.

Rzhevsky V.A. (1992). Fundamentals of State and Law. Rostov-on-Don, P. 13.

Shestopal, S. S., Lyubashits, V. Y., Astakhov, V. V., Pismennaya, E. E., Ryazantsev, S. V., Fedulov, A. M., & Barsukov, P. V. (2016). Features of Building Control Systems Sub-Locality in Modern Russia. International Review of Management and Marketing, 6(1S), 78-83.

Sulimenko N.V. (2010). Historical Types of State: Concepts and Approaches to Distinguishing Typological Features // Collection. 2-nd International Scientific and Practical Conference "Problems of Regional Management, Economics, Law and Innovation Processes in Education". Taganrog, P. 83-85.

Theory of Government and Law. (1948). М., P. 143.

Theory of State and Law / Ed. by A.M. Vasiliev. M., 1977. P. 97.

Voget F.W. (1975). A history of ethnology. N.Y.: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Р. 862.

Vorontsov S.A., (2017). Elitogenesis in the political processes of modern Russia, based on sociological (field) research. // Vorontsov S.A., Mamychev A.Yu., Ponedelkov A.V., Yanguzin A.R., Vildanov H. Man in India. Т. 97. № 23. С. 273-284.