Representative democracy under martial law

Abstract

The research of representative democracy under martial law is extremely relevant, especially in contemporary times when many countries face military conflicts and threats to national security. Notably, the military aggression of the Russian Federation on the territory of Ukraine has significantly altered the agenda in Ukraine regarding elections. In wartime, there arises a need for swift decision-making, which can lead to temporary limitations on democratic procedures. Analyzing this issue will help find a balance between effective crisis management and preserving the core of the democratic order. The purpose of this study is to examine the functioning of representative democracy under martial law, particularly how democratic institutions and processes are preserved and adapted during a crisis period. The research methodology includes empirical, comparative, and logical methods. The study examines the functioning of representative democracy under martial law. It explores the peculiarities of the operation of democratic institutions and government bodies during wartime, including the role of parliament, the president, and the judiciary. Changes in legislation aimed at ensuring state security and stability, as well as mechanisms for protecting citizens' rights and freedoms, are analyzed. Special attention is paid to balancing national security and adherence to democratic principles. Potential risks to democracy under prolonged martial law and possible ways to minimize them are also considered. Conclusions are drawn that, despite existing restrictions, it is essential to ensure these restrictions are proportional and temporary, while maintaining oversight by civil society.