Vol. 13 No. 76 (2024)
Articles

Paradigmatic dimensions of local public management research: The path to reliable managerial decisions

Oleksii Anatoliiovych Tretiak
Oles Honchar Dnipro National University, Dnipro Ukraine.
Author Biography

Doctor of Political Sciences, Professor, Head of Political Science, Sociology and Public administration Department of Oles Honchar Dnipro National University, Dnipro Ukraine.

Artem Oleksandrovych Khmelnykov
University of Customs and Finance of Ukraine (Dnipro, Ukraine).
Author Biography

Candidate of Political Sciences, Associate Professor, University of Customs and Finance of Ukraine (Dnipro, Ukraine).

Oleh Volodymyrovych Batrymenko
Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv (Kyiv, Ukraine).
Author Biography

Doctor of Political Sciences, Professor Head of Political Science Department of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv (Kyiv, Ukraine).

Мykola Karashchuk
Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, Ukraine.
Author Biography

PhD in Political Sciences, Associate Professor at the Politology Department, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, Ukraine.

Nataliia Husieva
State University of Trade and Economics, Kyiv, Ukraine.
Author Biography

PhD in Historical Sciences, Associate Professor at the Department of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science, State University of Trade and Economics, Kyiv, Ukraine.

Published 2024-04-30

Keywords

  • paradigmatic foundations, decision-making, local public management, local politics, epistemic freedom.

How to Cite

Tretiak, O. A., Khmelnykov, A. O., Batrymenko, O. V., Karashchuk М., & Husieva, N. (2024). Paradigmatic dimensions of local public management research: The path to reliable managerial decisions. Amazonia Investiga, 13(76), 228–235. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2024.76.04.18

Abstract

Explicated the need to compare the established paradigmatic ideas in local public management and in the political science research environment. Particular attention is paid to the important issue of the project relationship establishing between the paradigmatic approach and the subject field of public management research. Essential discrepancies between the key paradigmatic approaches to local public management and policy making at the local level are revealed. Stated the necessity of essential empirical material evaluation for further research and possibly improvement of the regulatory framework for local public management. Proved that the particular author's (actors`) main reason for conducting paradigmatic discussions on local public management is the need to communicate with a powerful research tradition. It is concluded that, the success of public policies and their impact on the lives of citizens depends on an understanding of epistemic foundations. Established that different paradigmatic alternatives of public decisions are determined on the basis of scientific data. Considered the most optimal way of applying any paradigmatic approaches is the analysis of the expediency of applying the methodology and forecasting the achievement of scientific novelty or specific results of management projects.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Baptista, N., Alves, H., & Matos, N. (2020). Public sector organizations and cocreation with citizens: A literature review on benefits, drivers, and barriers. Journal of Nonprofit Public Sector & Marketing, 32(3) 217-41. https://doi.org/10.1080/10495142.2019.1589623.
  2. Bryson, J.M., Crosby, B.C., & Stone, M.M. (2015). Designing and implementing cross-sector collaborations: Needed and challenging. Public Administration Review, 75(5), 647-63. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12432.
  3. Bueger, Ch., & Littoz-Monnet, A. (2023). Epistemic Orders and Global Governance. The Global. https://theglobal.blog/2023/05/23/epistemic-orders-and-global-governance/
  4. Cawley, M. (2016). Relationships between local governance and local government and the role of the State: evidence from the LEADER programme in Ireland. Norois, 241, 33-47.
  5. David, A., Yigitcanlar, T., Li, R.Y.M., Corchado, J.M., Cheong, P.H., Mossberger, K., & Mehmood, R. (2023). Understanding Local Government Digital Technology Adoption Strategies: A PRISMA Review. Sustainability, 15(12), 9645. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15129645
  6. Federation Of Canadian Municipalities. (2015). Strengthening Local Governance and Decentralization: Lessons and Experiences from Local Government Associations in Asia. https://acortar.link/I0q3RH
  7. Gurdon-Nagy, K. (2021). Paradigmatic Changes, or are Local Self-Governments Before or After Changes in Hungary? Transformation of the Regulation of Local Self-Governments. Hungarian Journal of Legal Studies, 60(4), 366-380. https://doi.org/10.1556/2052.2019.00021
  8. Lavelle, S. (2015). Paradigms of Governance: From Technocracy to Democracy. In I. Management Association (Ed.), Human Rights and Ethics: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications (pp. 555-576). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-6433-3.ch031
  9. Paananen, M., Alasuutari, M., Karila, K., & Siippainen, A. (2020). Epistemic governance in local policy debates: The case of entitlement to early childhood education and care in Finland. European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology, 7(1), 52-74. https://acortar.link/5xNUiW
  10. Pegan, A. (2023). Strategic planning for local government co-creation: Evidence from Croatia and Slovenia. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/14683857.2023.2190004
  11. Schoburgh, E. D. (2009). Paradigm shift or rhetorical flourish? The ‘new orthodoxy’ of local governance in the Caribbean. Social and Economic Studies, 58(1), 95-124. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/27866577
  12. Yatsyna, Y., & Kudinov, I. (2023). Innovative analytical and statistical technology as a corruption counteraction tool: conceptual analysis. Amazonia Investiga, 12(67), 78-86. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2023.67.07.7
  13. Ylönen, M., Jaakkola, J., & Saari, L. (2021). Conceptualizing Epistemic Power: The Changing Relationship Between Economic Policy Paradigms and Academic Disciplines. Accounting, Economics, and Law: A Convivium, 14(1), 39-65. https://doi.org/10.1515/ael-2021-0048