Paradigmatic dimensions of local public management research: The path to reliable managerial decisions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2024.76.04.18Palavras-chave:
paradigmatic foundations, decision-making, local public management, local politics, epistemic freedom.Resumo
Explicated the need to compare the established paradigmatic ideas in local public management and in the political science research environment. Particular attention is paid to the important issue of the project relationship establishing between the paradigmatic approach and the subject field of public management research. Essential discrepancies between the key paradigmatic approaches to local public management and policy making at the local level are revealed. Stated the necessity of essential empirical material evaluation for further research and possibly improvement of the regulatory framework for local public management. Proved that the particular author's (actors`) main reason for conducting paradigmatic discussions on local public management is the need to communicate with a powerful research tradition. It is concluded that, the success of public policies and their impact on the lives of citizens depends on an understanding of epistemic foundations. Established that different paradigmatic alternatives of public decisions are determined on the basis of scientific data. Considered the most optimal way of applying any paradigmatic approaches is the analysis of the expediency of applying the methodology and forecasting the achievement of scientific novelty or specific results of management projects.
Downloads
Referências
Baptista, N., Alves, H., & Matos, N. (2020). Public sector organizations and cocreation with citizens: A literature review on benefits, drivers, and barriers. Journal of Nonprofit Public Sector & Marketing, 32(3) 217-41. https://doi.org/10.1080/10495142.2019.1589623.
Bryson, J.M., Crosby, B.C., & Stone, M.M. (2015). Designing and implementing cross-sector collaborations: Needed and challenging. Public Administration Review, 75(5), 647-63. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12432.
Bueger, Ch., & Littoz-Monnet, A. (2023). Epistemic Orders and Global Governance. The Global. https://theglobal.blog/2023/05/23/epistemic-orders-and-global-governance/
Cawley, M. (2016). Relationships between local governance and local government and the role of the State: evidence from the LEADER programme in Ireland. Norois, 241, 33-47.
David, A., Yigitcanlar, T., Li, R.Y.M., Corchado, J.M., Cheong, P.H., Mossberger, K., & Mehmood, R. (2023). Understanding Local Government Digital Technology Adoption Strategies: A PRISMA Review. Sustainability, 15(12), 9645. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15129645
Federation Of Canadian Municipalities. (2015). Strengthening Local Governance and Decentralization: Lessons and Experiences from Local Government Associations in Asia. https://acortar.link/I0q3RH
Gurdon-Nagy, K. (2021). Paradigmatic Changes, or are Local Self-Governments Before or After Changes in Hungary? Transformation of the Regulation of Local Self-Governments. Hungarian Journal of Legal Studies, 60(4), 366-380. https://doi.org/10.1556/2052.2019.00021
Lavelle, S. (2015). Paradigms of Governance: From Technocracy to Democracy. In I. Management Association (Ed.), Human Rights and Ethics: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications (pp. 555-576). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-6433-3.ch031
Paananen, M., Alasuutari, M., Karila, K., & Siippainen, A. (2020). Epistemic governance in local policy debates: The case of entitlement to early childhood education and care in Finland. European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology, 7(1), 52-74. https://acortar.link/5xNUiW
Pegan, A. (2023). Strategic planning for local government co-creation: Evidence from Croatia and Slovenia. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/14683857.2023.2190004
Schoburgh, E. D. (2009). Paradigm shift or rhetorical flourish? The ‘new orthodoxy’ of local governance in the Caribbean. Social and Economic Studies, 58(1), 95-124. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/27866577
Yatsyna, Y., & Kudinov, I. (2023). Innovative analytical and statistical technology as a corruption counteraction tool: conceptual analysis. Amazonia Investiga, 12(67), 78-86. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2023.67.07.7
Ylönen, M., Jaakkola, J., & Saari, L. (2021). Conceptualizing Epistemic Power: The Changing Relationship Between Economic Policy Paradigms and Academic Disciplines. Accounting, Economics, and Law: A Convivium, 14(1), 39-65. https://doi.org/10.1515/ael-2021-0048
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2024 Amazonia Investiga
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png)
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.