Vol. 13 No. 73 (2024)
Articles

The discourse of American and British political interviews

Maryana Salamakha
Ivan Franko National University of Lviv, Ukraine.
Bio
Iryna Semeriak
Ivan Franko National University of Lviv, Ukraine.
Bio
Larysa Solohub
Ivan Franko National University of Lviv, Ukraine.
Bio
Olha Vynnyk
Ivan Franko National University of Lviv, Ukraine.
Bio
Iryna Bodnar
Ivan Franko National University of Lviv, Ukraine.
Bio

Published 2024-01-30

Keywords

  • media influence, political discourse, markers of influence, public opinion, corpus analysis.

How to Cite

Salamakha, M., Semeriak, I., Solohub, L., Vynnyk, O., & Bodnar, I. (2024). The discourse of American and British political interviews. Amazonia Investiga, 13(73), 165–176. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2024.73.01.13

Abstract

The aim is to conduct a comparative analysis of the political discourse of Great Britain and the United States, in particular the study of the speech style of the leaders, the context and the role of the media in the formation of public opinion. Methods. The study employs the method of analysis of lexical units, the linguistic method of field structures, and the method of stylistic analysis of markers. Standard methods of mathematical statistics were used, as well as Cronbach’s alpha to check the reliability of the research methods. Conclusions. The study reveals the importance of the media’s role in political discourse, especially in the dissemination of political interviews and their public perception. A comparison of UK and US political discourse reveals both similarities and differences in the communication of political leaders, and helps analyse each country’s response to common challenges and issues. Prospects. Further research could focus on gendered aspects of political speech, including the analysis of the gender’s role in shaping political discourse and identifying gender stereotypes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Allsop, J. (2019). The dangerous power of Trump’s ‘fairy tale’ nicknames. Columbia Journalism Review. Retrieved from https://acortar.link/cDXvz8

BBC News. (2023). In full: Boris Johnson interview. [Video] Youtube. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3rm45jiPrdw

Brown, K., & Mondon, A. (2021). Populism, the media, and the mainstreaming of the far right: The Guardian’s coverage of populism as a case study. Politics, 41(3), 279-295. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263395720955036

Cervone, C., Augoustinos, M., & Maass, A. (2021). The language of derogation and hate: Functions, consequences, and reappropriation. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 40(1) 80-101. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X20967394

CNN Politics. (2023). Sanders: Democrats must 'make it clear' they stand with workers. Retrieved from https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2023/08/27/sotu-bernie-sanders-full.cnn

Cremer, T. (2023). A Europeanisation of American politics? Trumpism and the populist radical right in the United States. Journal of Language and Politics, 22(3), 396-414. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.22135.cre

Druckman, J.N., Gubitz, S.R., Levendusky, M.S., & Lloyd, A.M. (2019). How incivility on partisan media (de) polarises the electorate. The Journal of Politics, 81(1), 291-295. https://doi.org/10.1086/699912

Farhall, K., Carson, A., Wright, S., Gibbons, A., & Lukamto, W. (2019). Political elites’ use of fake news discourse across communications platforms. International Journal of Communication, 13, 4353-4375. Retrieved from https://acortar.link/AJUZNB

Feldman, O. (Ed.). (2022). Adversarial political interviewing: worldwide perspectives during polarised times. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore. Retrieved from https://acortar.link/kDUcaw

Feldman, O. (Ed.). (2023). Political debasement: Incivility, contempt, and humiliation in parliamentary and public discourse. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore. Retrieved from https://acortar.link/c6I3g6

Ferrara, F. M., Haas, J. S., Peterson, A., & Sattler, T. (2022). Exports vs. investment: How political discourse shapes popular support for external imbalances. Socio-Economic Review, 20(4), 1961-1989. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwab004

Gervais, B. T. (2019). Rousing the partisan combatant: Elite incivility, anger, and antideliberative attitudes. Political Psychology, 40(3), 637–655. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12532

Herndon, A. (2023). In Search of Kamala Harris. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2023/10/10/magazine/kamala-harris.html

Hickman, R., & Huaylla Sallo, K. (2022). The political economy of streetspace reallocation projects: Aldgate Square and Bank Junction, London. Journal of Urban Design, 27(4), 397-420. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2022.2033113

ITV News. (2023). Prime Minister, Rishi Sunak, sits down with ITV News for an in depth interview. Retrieved from https://acortar.link/2NoauD

Konotop, ?., Bondar, ?., Terletska, L., Kyrychenko, S., & Ovsyanko, G. (2022). Methods of using digital technologies for the development of students’ listening comprehension strategies in higher educational institutions. Journal for Educators, Teachers and Trainers, 13(3), 247-259. https://doi.org/10.47750/jett.2022.13.03.024

Lilja, M. (2022). Theorising resistance formations: reverse discourses, spatial resistance and networked dissent. Global Society, 36(3), 309-329. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600826.2022.2052020

Lynggaard, K. (2019). Discourse analysis and European Union politics. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/book/10.1057/978-1-137-39326-5

Malnick, E. (2023). I look across the despatch box at Keir Starmer and I don’t see any principles. The Telegraph. Retrieved from https://acortar.link/SprKng

Navera, G. S. (2021). The president as macho: Machismo, misogyny, and the language of toxic masculinity in Philippine presidential discourse. In O. Feldman (Ed.), When politicians talk: The cultural dynamics of public speaking (pp. 187–202). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-3579-3_11

O’Grady, T. (2022). The Transformation of British Welfare Policy: Politics, Discourse, and Public Opinion. Oxford (UK): Oxford University Press. Retrieved from https://acortar.link/Hm1qRl

Otto, L. P., Lecheler, S., & Schuck, A. R. (2020). Is context the key? The (non-)differential effects of mediated incivility in three European countries. Political Communication, 37(1), 88-107. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2019.1663324

Perreault, G., Kananovich, V., & Hackett, E. (2023). Guarding the Firewall: How Political Journalists distance themselves from the editorial endorsement process. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 100(2), 354-372. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177/10776990221084609

Pickard, S., Bowman, B., & Arya, D. (2020). “We are radical in our kindness”: The political socialisation, motivations, demands and protest actions of young environmental activists in Britain. Youth and Globalisation, 2(2), 251-280. Retrieved from https://brill.com/view/journals/yogo/2/2/article-p251_251.xml

Rangoni, S., Bedock, C., & Talukder, D. (2023). More competent thus more legitimate? MPs’ discourses on deliberative mini-publics. Acta Politica, 58(3), 531-551. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057/s41269-021-00209-4

Richards-Gray, L. (2022). Political discourse and gendered welfare reform: a case study of the UK Coalition government. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 32(2), 358-376. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457289.2020.1760283

Roulin, N., Lukacik, E. R., Bourdage, J. S., Clow, L., Bakour, H., & Diaz, P. (2023). Bias in the background? The role of background information in asynchronous video interviews. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 44(3), 458-475. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2680

Segev, E. (2020). Textual network analysis: Detecting prevailing themes and biases in international news and social media. Sociology Compass, 14(4), e12779. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12779

Seppälä, T. (2022). “No One is Illegal” As a Reverse Discourse Against Deportability. Global Society, 36(3), 391-408. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600826.2022.2052023

Sievert, K., Lawrence, M., Parker, C., & Baker, P. (2022). What’s really at ‘steak’? Understanding the global politics of red and processed meat reduction: a framing analysis of stakeholder interviews. Environmental Science & Policy, 137, 12-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2022.08.007

Sky News. (2023). COVID Inquiry: Former Scottish first minister Nicola Sturgeon gives evidence. [YouYube]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cpa7-yii6Yc

Szabó, G., Kmetty, Z., & Molnár, E. K. (2021). Politics and incivility in the online comments: What is beyond the norm-violation approach? International Journal of Communication, 15, 1659-1684. Retrieved from https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/16411

The Guardian. (2023). Liz Truss: «Freedom of speech is essential to a healthy democracy». Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/politics/liz-truss

The Independent. (2022). Key moments from Joe Biden's CNN interview. [Video] Youtube. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fvtMsMMGZKc

von Soest, C. (2023). Why do we speak to experts? Reviving the strength of the expert interview method. Perspectives on Politics, 21(1), 277-287. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592722001116

Washburn, R., Klages, A.-L., & Mazur, A. (2023). Reflections on Situational Analysis and its Use for Analysing Visual Discourses: An Interview with Rachel Washburn on the Positionality of Situational Analysis in Qualitative Inquiry. In Gauditz, L., Klages, A.-L., Kruse, S., Marr, E., Mazur, A., Schwertel, T., Tietje, O. (Eds.), Die Situationsanalyse als Forschungsprogramm: Theoretische Implikationen, Forschungspraxis und Anwendungsbeispiele (pp. 53-66). Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-658-38714-3_4

Williams, L., & Sovacool, B. K. (2019). The discursive politics of ‘fracking’: Frames, storylines, and the anticipatory contestation of shale gas development in the United Kingdom. Global Environmental Change, 58, 101935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.101935

Wodak, R. (2020). The politics of fear: The shameless normalisation of far-right discourse. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications Ltd. Retrieved from https://www.torrossa.com/en/resources/an/5019443