Peculiarities of decision-making by persons with high and low levels of tolerance

Mykyta Babchuk; Olena Babchuk; Iryna Pospelova; Denis Voznyi; Olena Ivanova

doi:10.34069/AI/2023.72.12.23

Mykyta Babchuk Odesa National Economic University, Odessa, Ukraine. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8725-799X
Olena Babchuk State institution «South Ukrainian National Pedagogical University named after K.D. Ushynsky», Odessa, Ukraine. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5712-909X
Iryna Pospelova Mykolas Romeris University Institute of Psychology, Vilnius, Lithuania. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8802-475X
Denis Voznyi Odessa National Economic University, Ukraine. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2712-5861
Olena Ivanova Odesa National Maritime University, Odessa, Ukraine. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5653-3661

DOI: https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2023.72.12.23

Keywords: decision-making, tolerance, personality, tolerance levels.

Abstract

Abstract: the article examines the peculiarities of decision-making by people with different levels of tolerance. Tolerance is unity in diversity, it is a quality that is a humanistic component of an individual and is determined by his valuable attitude towards others. It represents an attitude towards a highly moral type of relationship, which is manifested in a person's actions. The purpose of this work was a theoretical-empirical study of the psychological features of decision-making by individuals with different levels of tolerance. Diagnostics of decision-making indicators and tolerance indicators was carried out with the help of: "Melbourne Decision-Making Questionnaire", "Personal Decision-Making Factors", "Decision-Making Questionnaire", "Qualitative Tolerance Indicators Test-Questionnaire". Correlation analysis made it possible to establish the nature of interdependence between the studied indicators - tolerance and decision-making. The use of qualitative data analysis made it possible to identify groups of people with a high and low level of tolerance using the "aces" method and to draw up their characteristics. Individuals with a high level of tolerance demonstrate a high level of attitude to complex tasks and novelty, have a high readiness to adapt to an uncertain situation, are able to change their plans in new conditions. People with a low level of tolerance have a tendency to spontaneity, impulsiveness when making a decision.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Mykyta Babchuk, Odesa National Economic University, Odessa, Ukraine.

Teacher of the of the Department of Language and Psychological and Pedagogical Training of the Odesa National Economic University, Odessa, Ukraine.

Olena Babchuk, State institution «South Ukrainian National Pedagogical University named after K.D. Ushynsky», Odessa, Ukraine.

PhD (Psychological Sciences), Associate Professor the Head of Department of Family and Special Pedagogy and Psychology of the State institution «South Ukrainian National Pedagogical University named after K.D. Ushynsky», Odessa, Ukraine.

Iryna Pospelova, Mykolas Romeris University Institute of Psychology, Vilnius, Lithuania.

PhD (Psychological Sciences), Associate Professor, Mykolas Romeris University Faculty of Human and Social Studies Institute of Psychology, Vilnius, Lithuania.

Denis Voznyi, Odessa National Economic University, Ukraine.

PhD (Medical Sciences), senior lecturer of the Department of Language and Psychological and Pedagogical Training of the Odesa National Economic University, Ukraine and a narcologist of the highest category of the toxicological and narcological department of the KNP "OOMTCPZ" OOR, Odessa, Ukraine.

Olena Ivanova, Odesa National Maritime University, Odessa, Ukraine.

PhD (Psychological Sciences), senior lecturer, Department of Practical Psychology Odesa National Maritime University, Odessa, Ukraine.

References

Anokhin, P.K. (1978). Fundamental issues of the general theory of functional systems. Selected works. Philosophical aspects of the theory of functional systems. Science, 2099, 17-60. https://www.keldysh.ru/pages/BioCyber/RT/Functional.pdf (Russia)

Asmolov, A.G. (2000). On the way to tolerant consciousness. Moscow: Meaning, 255 p. URL: https://klex.ru/7sy (Russia)

Aizenko, H. (1963). Personal questionnaire Eysenck Personality Inventory (EPI). Studlancer. https://acortar.link/itLk89

Babchuk, O. G. (2015). Psychological characteristics of tolerant and intolerant individuals. Science and education, 10, 116-121. https://acortar.link/b0rjFQ (Ukraine)

Ball, G.A. (2006). Psychology in a rational humanistic perspective: Selected works. K.: "Osnova" Publishing House, 408. https://acortar.link/qi0mjA (Russia)

Bezyuleva, G.V., & Shelamova, G.M. (2003). Tolerance: view, search, solution.: Moscow: Verbum-M, 164. https://search.rsl.ru/ru/record/01002429529 (Russia)

Bryukhova, N.G. (2016). Moral and psychological aspects of the manager making an organizational decision. Innovation Science, 3-3(15), 200-201. https://acortar.link/40Cm4w (Russia)

Golovin, S. Yu. (1998). Dictionary of a practical psychologist. Minsk: Harvest, 800. URL: https://acortar.link/Difvch (Russia)

Herrera-Viedma, E., Palomares, I., Cong-Cong, Li., Cabrerizo, F. J., Dong, Y., Chiclana, F., & Herrera, F. (2021). Revisiting Fuzzy and Linguistic Decision Making: Scenarios and Challenges for Making Wiser Decisions in a Better Way. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 51(1), 191-208. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.2020.3043016

Ilyin, E. P. (2009). Psychology of will: textbook. 2nd ed. Peter Press LLC, 368. https://4sport.ua/_upl/2/1401/105_Ilin_E_P__Psikhologia_voli.pdf (Ukraine)

Karpov, A.V., Karpov, A.A., & Markova, E.V. (2016). Psychology of decision making in management activities. Metasystem approach. Yaroslavl: YarSU; M.: Publishing house. house of RAO, 644. http://www.lib.uniyar.ac.ru/edocs/iuni/20160531.pdf (Russia)

Kornilova, T. V. (2003). Psychology of risk and decision making: a textbook for universities. Publishing house Aspect Press, 286. https://www.klex.ru/v5b (Russia)

Kozlov, V. N. (2009). System analysis and decision making. St. Petersburg: Publishing house of the Polytechnic University, 223. URL: https://b.eruditor.link/file/501357/ (Russia)

Kulinich, I.O. (2008). Psychology of management: teaching. manual. Kyiv: Znannia, 292. URL: https://acortar.link/vcbHZT (Ukraine)

Larichev, O.I. (1979). The Science and Art of Decision Making. M.: Nauka, 200. https://acortar.link/PLu6QJ (Russia)

Liga 360. (1995). Declaration of principles of tolerance. Department of education and science of the executive body of Kyiv city council. https://ips.ligazakon.net/document/MU95324

Malakooti, B. (2012). Decision making process: typology, intelligence, and optimization. J Intell Manuf, 23, 733-746. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-010-0424-1

Mann, L., Burnett, P., Radford, M., & Ford, S. (1997). The Melbourne Decision Making Questionnaire: An instrument for measuring patterns for coping with decisional conflict. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 10(1), 1-19. https://acortar.link/yEYUhK

Reardon, B.E. (2001). Tolerance is the road to peace. Publishing house "Bon Fi", 304. https://search.rsl.ru/ru/record/01005476585 (Russia)

Sannikov, A. I. (2015). Individual psychological qualities of a personality and of decision-making style. Science and Education a New Dimension. Pedagogy and Psychology, III(22), 75-78. https://acortar.link/BkqcW0 (in English)

Sannikova, O.P., & Sannikov, A.I. (2020). Tolerance to uncertainty as a predictor of decision-making by an individual. Bulletin of postgraduate education. Series: Social and behavioral sciences, 12, 98-123. https://doi.org/10.32405/2522‐9931/2522‐9958‐2020‐12(41)‐98‐123

Soldatova, G.U., & Shaigerova, L.A. (2008). Psychodiagnostics of a tolerant personality. Smysl Publishing, 172. https://studfile.net/preview/8977454/ (Russia)

Sumina, E.S. (2007). Tolerance (from a phenomenon to a linguistic concept) (diss. ... cand. Philol. Sciences Thesis), "Ural State Pedagogical University", Yekaterinburg, 277 p. https://acortar.link/Y0RNmA (Russia)

Tikhomirov, O.K., Telegina, E.D., & Volkova, T.G. (1977). Psychological mechanisms of goal formation. Moscow: Nauka, 259. https://search.rsl.ru/ru/record/01007648820 (Russia)

Tweed, M., & Wilkinson, T. (2019). Student progress decision-making in programmatic assessment: can we extrapolate from clinical decision-making and jury decision-making? BMC Medical Education, 19, 176. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1583-1

Tytarenko, T.M. (2005). Personal Choice: The Psychology of Despair and Hope. K.: Millennium, pp 336. URL: https://acortar.link/mnsRLb (Ukraine)

Valitova, R.R. (1997). Tolerance as an ethical problem (dis. ...cand. philosopher. Sciences), "Buryat State University", Ulan-Ude, 159 p. https://www.dissercat.com/content/tolerantnost-kak-eticheskaya-problema

Vasylyuk, F. E. (1997). Psychotechnics of choice. Psychology with a human face: a humanistic perspective in post-Soviet psychology. Ed. YES. Leontyeva, V.G. Shchur. M.: Smysl, 336 p. https://acortar.link/gbBKY8 (Russia)

Yakymchuk, I. (2022). Individual psychological prerequisites and types of personal choice. Bulletin of the National University of Defense of Ukraine, 69(5), 151-157. https://doi.org/10.33099/2617-6858-2022-69-5-151-157 (Ukraine)