Published 2023-11-30
Keywords
- cyberspace, disinformation, information policy, social networks, fake information.
How to Cite
Abstract
The spread of disinformation in digital communication causes anti-democratic behaviour among Internet users, which may threaten national security. The aim of the study was to determine the legal means of combating disinformation on the Internet as the main factor in shaping antisocial behaviour in terms of digital content. This issue was studied using the methods of comparative analysis, system logical analysis and doctrinal approach, as well as empirical and theoretical methods. Legal means of combating disinformation in cyberspace are means aimed at detecting and removing manipulative information from the information space. The state information policy aimed at combating fakes should ensure the transparency of digital platforms, improve the digital literacy of society, and establish monitoring and control over the information flow in cyberspace. International information standards oblige developers of social networks and digital platforms to create accessible and safe content for their users to combat disinformation in cyberspace. The results of the study are useful for governments in the context of the formation of an effective state system of means of combating fake news.
Downloads
References
Akulenko, L., Balakireva, O., Volosevych, ?., Dmytruk, D., Kostyuchenko, ?., Latsiba, I., Pavlova, D., & Shurenkova, ?. (2020). World Values Survey 2020 in Ukraine. Kyiv: Ukrainian Center for European Policy. (In Ukranian)
Allcott, H., Gentzkow, M., & Yu, C. (2019). Trends in the diffusion of misinformation on social media. Research & Politics, 6(2), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168019848554
Bayer, J., Bitiukova, N., Bard, P., Szakács, J., Alemanno, A., & Uszkiewicz, E. (2019). Disinformation and propaganda – Impact on the functioning of the rule of law in the EU and its member states. Brussels: European Parliament. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3409279
Bidzilya, Y., Tolochko, N., Haladzhun, Z., Solomin, Y., & Shapovalova, H. (2022). The problems in the development of public broadcasting in the polycultural borderland Region of Ukraine. Amazonia Investiga, 11(53), 59-69. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2022.53.05.6
Bimber, B., & Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2020). The unedited public sphere. New Media & Society, 22(4), 700-715. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819893980
Carson, A., & Gibbons, A. (2023). The big chill? How journalists and sources perceive and respond to fake news laws in Indonesia and Singapore. Journalism Studies, 22(14), 1819-1838. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2023.2192299
Cendic, K., & Gosztonyi, G. (2022). Main Regulatory Plans in European Union’s New Digital Regulation Package. In: D. A. Alexandrov (Ed.), Digital Transformation and Global Society. DTGS 2021. Communications in Computer and Information Science (??. 163-176). Cham, Switzerland: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93715-7_12
Chen, K. W. (2021). Dealing with disinformation from the perspective of militant democracy: A case study of Taiwan’s Struggle to regulate disinformation. In: Ch. Sieber-Gasser & A. Ghibellini (Eds.), Democracy and globalization: Legal and political analysis on the eve of the 4th Industrial Revolution (?p. 125-147). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Clayton, K., Davis, J., Hinckley, K., & Horiuchi, Y. (2019). Partisan motivated reasoning and misinformation in the media: Is news from ideologically uncongenial sources more suspicious? Japanese Journal of Political Science, 20(3), 129-142. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1468109919000082
Colomina, C., & Pérez-Soler, S. (2022). Information disorder in the European Union: building a regulatory response. Revista CIDOB d'Afers Internacionals, 131, 141-161. https://doi.org/10.24241/rcai.2022.131.2.141
Council of Europe. (2018). Recommendation CM/Rec(2018)2 of the Committee of Ministers to member States on the roles and responsibilities of internet intermediaries. Retrieved from https://rm.coe.int/0900001680790e14
European Commission. (2018). Action Plan against Disinformation. Retrieved from https://acortar.link/QOTtom
European Convention on Human Rights. (1950). European Court of Human Rights, Council of Europe. Retrieved from from https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/convention_eng.pdf
Federal Ministry of Justice. (2017). On the Regulation of Social Networks. Retrieved from https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/netzdg/BJNR335210017.html
Greene, J. A., & Yu, S. B. (2016). Educating critical thinkers: The role of epistemic cognition. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3, 45-53. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732215622223
Halbert, D. (2016). Intellectual property theft and national security: Agendas and assumptions. The Information Society, 32(4), 256-268. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2016.1177762
Krzywo?, A. (2021). Summary judicial proceedings as a measure for Electoral disinformation: Defining the European standard. German Law Journal, 22(4), 673-688. https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2021.23
Kutscher, S. (2022). Fake news and the illusion of truth: The influence of media on German political discourse in the wake of COVID-19. Sortuz: Oñati Journal of Emergent Socio-Legal Studies, 11(2), 142–169.
Lonardo, L. (2021). EU law against hybrid threats: A first assessment. European Papers-a Journal on Law and Integration, 6(2), 1075-1096. https://doi.org/10.15166/2499-8249/514
McKay, S., & Tenove, C. (2021). Disinformation as a threat to deliberative democracy. Political Research Quarterly, 74(3), 703-717. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912920938143
Miller, M. L., & Vaccari, C. (2020). Digital threats to democracy: Comparative lessons and possible remedies. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 25(3), 333-356. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161220922323
Monti, M. (2020a). Italian Populism and Fake News on the Internet: A new political weapon in the public discourse. In G. Delledonne, G. Martinico, M. Monti, & F. Pacini (Eds.), Italian populism and constitutional law: Strategies, conflicts and dilemmas (?p. 177-197). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
Monti, M. (2020b). The EU Code of practice on disinformation and the risk of the privatisation of censorship. In S. Giusti, & E. Piras (Eds.), Democracy and fake news. Information manipulation and post-truth politics (?. 214-225). London: Routledge.
Novais, R. A. (2021). Veracity pledge or discreditation strategy? Accusations of legacy disinformation in presidential campaigns in Cabo Verde. Southern Communication Journal, 86(3), 201-214. https://doi.org/10.1080/1041794X.2021.1903539
Parliamentary Assembly. (2020). Democracy hacked? How to respond? Retrieved from https://acortar.link/ndhPNd
Rak, J. (2022). Neo-militant democracy and (Un)fulfilled destination of consolidated democracies? The inner six in comparative perspective. Historia i Polityka, 40(47), 9-24.
Rapp, D. N., & Salovich, N. A. (2018). Can’t we just disregard fake news? The Consequences of Exposure to Inaccurate Information. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 5(2), 232-239. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732218785193
Tenove, C. (2020). Protecting democracy from disinformation: Normative threats and Policy responses. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 25(3), 517-537. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161220918740
Teo, K. X. (2021). Civil society responses to Singapore’s online “Fake news” Law. International Journal of Communication, 15, 4795-4815.
Vese, D. (2022). Governing fake news: the regulation of social media and the right to freedom of expression in the era of emergency. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 13(3), 477-513. https://doi.org/10.1017/err.2021.48
Whyte, ?. (2020). Deepfake news: AI-enabled disinformation as a multi-level public policy challenge. Journal of Cyber Policy, 5(2), 199-217. https://doi.org/10.1080/23738871.2020.1797135