Vol. 12 No. 70 (2023)
Articles

Mediation in administrative and legal disputes in Ukraine: a European perspective

Vladyslav Teremetskyi
National Academy of Legal Sciences, Ukraine
Author Biography

Doctor in Law, Professor, leading research scientist of the Department of International Private and Comparative Law, Academician F.H. Burchak Scientific Research Institute of Private Law and Entrepreneurship, National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine

Kseniia Tokarieva
National Aviation University, Ukraine
Author Biography

Doctor of Law, Associate Professor of the Department of Constitutional and Administrative Law, Faculty of Law, National Aviation University, Kyiv, Ukraine

Maryna Myronenko
National Aviation University, Ukraine.
Author Biography

A graduate student of the National Aviation University, Department of Administrative Law and Procedure, Kyiv, Ukraine.

Inna Mishchuk
National University of Water Management and Nature Engineering, Ukraine.
Author Biography

Ph.D. in Law, Associate Professor, professor of the Department of Constitutional Law and branch disciplines of the EducationalScientific Institute of Law, National University of Water Management and Nature Engineering, Rivne, Ukraine.

Yuliia Melnychuk
National University of Water Management and Environmental Engineering, Ukraine.
Author Biography

Ph.D. in Philosophy, Associate Professor, associate professor of the Department of Legal Environmental Disciplines of EducationalScientific Institute of Law, National University of Water Management and Environmental Engineering, Rivne, Ukraine.

Published 2023-10-30

Keywords

  • mediation, legal aid, administrativelegal dispute, subject of authority, public-legal relations, notary, institutional mediation.

How to Cite

Teremetskyi, V., Tokarieva, K., Myronenko, M., Mishchuk, I., & Melnychuk, Y. (2023). Mediation in administrative and legal disputes in Ukraine: a European perspective. Amazonia Investiga, 12(70), 200–209. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2023.70.10.18

Abstract

The purpose of the article is to study the foreign and Ukrainian experience in the development of the institution of mediation in administrative and legal disputes. Research methods are analysis, synthesis, generalization, analogy, comparative law, analysis of court practice, and others. The article examines the requirements for a professional mediator as an element of the effectiveness of mediation in administrativelegal disputes and the European experience of normative-legal consolidation of the organization of mediation in administrative-legal disputes. The authors analyze the possibility of involving a notary as a qualified lawyer and mediator, especially in public legal disputes. The study provides examples of successful mediation implementation practices in the United States and European Union countries. In addition, the authors emphasized the need for institutional mediation to resolve administrative-legal disputes, taking into account their complexity, using France’s experience to improve publiclegal relations in Ukraine. It has been emphasized that mediation helps to reduce the burden on the judicial system, ensures a faster and more efficient resolution of administrative cases, and helps preserve the relationship between the parties, building trust between the state and the citizen.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Apalkova, I. S. (2021). Mediation in the United States of America. Alternative methods of resolving civil disputes (p. 18–20). Odesa: Fenix. (In Ukrainian)
  2. Code of Ukraine № 2747-IV. Administrative Judicial Code of Ukraine. Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, 2023. Recovered from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2747-15#Text
  3. Conclusion on the Draft Law of Ukraine No. 3504. On Mediation. Bulletin of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine, November 16, 2020. Recovered from https://w1.c1.rada.gov.ua/pls/zweb2/webproc4_1?pf3511=68877
  4. Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe (2001). Recommendation Rec (2001) 9 of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe to member states on alternatives to litigation between administrative authorities and private parties, September 5, 2001. Retrieved from Recovered from https://rm.coe.int/16805e2b59
  5. Council of Europe (2007). CEPEJ. Guidelines No. 14 for a better implementation of the existing recommendation concerning family mediation and mediation in civil matters. December 7, 2007. Recovered from https://rm.coe.int/16807475b6
  6. Dąbrowski, M., Broński, W., & Concepción Rayón Ballestero, M. (2023). Legal Status and Acquisition of Mediator Qualifications. A Legal Comparative Analysis of Regulations in Spain and Poland. Review of European and Comparative Law, (53(2)), 27-46. https://doi.org/10.31743/recl.16141
  7. Dubovik, O. (2015). Development of restorative justice in the Roman law legal system. European political and law discourse, 2(2), 299-304. Recovered from https://eppd13.cz/wpcontent/uploads/2015/2015-2-2/47.pdf
  8. Federal Justice Public Service (2005). Law modifying the Judicial Code with regard to mediation No. 2005009173. Federal Justice Public Service, February 21, 2005, Belgium. Recovered from https://acortar.link/KGf7wu
  9. Fihun, N. (2021). Establishment of the institute of mediation in the Visegrad Group countries. Actual problems of jurisprudencе, (1(25)), 11–26. Recovered from http://dspace.wunu.edu.ua/bitstream/316497/42025/1/Фігун.pdf (In Ukrainian)
  10. Hopt, K. J., & Steffek, F. (2013). Mediation: Comparison of Laws, Regulatory Models, Fundamental Issues. Mediation: principles and regulation in comparative perspective. (Eds.) Oxford University Press, 4-130.
  11. Kalisz, A., & Serhieieva, A. (2023). When a State Is a Party to a Dispute – (Court-) Administrative Mediation in Poland and in Ukraine (A Comparative Perspective). Review of European and Comparative Law, (53(2)), 129-148. https://doi.org/10.31743/recl.15967
  12. Kavalnė, S., & Saudargaitė, I. (2011). Mediation in disputes between public authorities and private parties: comparative aspects. Jurisprudencija, 18(1), 251-265. Recovered from https://philpapers.org/rec/KAVMID
  13. Kondratenko, V., & Kovalenko, N. (2023). Organizational-legal and procedural aspects of mediation in the administrative judicial branch of Ukraine. Scientific innovations and advanced technologies, (1(15)), 104-111. https://doi.org/10.52058/2786-5274-2023-1(15)-104-111 (In Ukrainian)
  14. Kułak-Krzysiak, K., & Śwital, P. (2023). Mediation as Means of Communication for Public Administration in Settling Administrative Disputes. Review of European and Comparative Law, 54(3), 279-301. https://acortar.link/PEbsC3
  15. Melnychuk, O. F. (2022). Mediation in administrative proceedings: european experience for Ukraine. Scientific Bulletin of the Uzhhorod National University. Series "LAW", (72), 77-81. Recovered from http://visnykpravo.uzhnu.edu.ua/article/view/267383/263267 (In Ukrainian)
  16. Law of Ukraine No. 1875-IX. On mediation. Bulletin of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine, (2021) (Ukraine). Recovered from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1875-20#Text
  17. Lazebny, L. (2019, 29 September). Mediation vs settlement of the dispute with the participation of a judgeі. Legal Newspaper. Recovered from https://acortar.link/PGCgQG (In Ukrainian)
  18. Official Journal of the European Union (2008). Directive 2008/52/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council., May 21, 2008. Recovered from https://eurlex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2008/52/oj
  19. Paris (2022, April 26). Paris Mediator Service. Recovered from https://acortar.link/NEVFcK
  20. Official Web Site of Valia - Wallex (2018). New municipal law No. 12482, June 24, 1988, Belgium. Recovered from https://acortar.link/8tI0xe
  21. Online Master of Legal Studies Website (2021). Court-Certified Mediator Qualification Requirements by State, May, 2021. Recovered from https://acortar.link/AUrfWl
  22. Samotuga, A. (2022). Municipal mediation: the experience of France. Mediation as a way of solving private and public legal disputes, p. 264–266. Dnipro: Dnipropetrovsk State University of Internal Affairs. Recovered from https://acortar.link/wuyFDG (In Ukrainian)
  23. Singapore Convention on Mediation Website (2021). United Nations Convention on International Settlement Agreements Resulting from Mediation (the «Singapore Convention on Mediation»), September 12, 2020. Recovered from https://www.singaporeconvention.org/convention/text
  24. Teremetskyi, V., Boiko, V., Malyshev, O., Seleznova, O., & Kelbia, S. (2023). Electronic judiciary in Ukraine: Problems of implementation and possible solutions. Amazonia Investiga, 12(68), 33-42. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2023.68.08.3 (In Ukrainian)
  25. Tokarieva, K. (2021). Administrative and legal regulation of mediation: current state and development trends (Dissertation for obtaining the scientific degree of doctor of legal sciences), National aviation university, Ukraine. Recovered from https://er.nau.edu.ua/handle/NAU/49754 (In Ukrainian)
  26. Turchak, I. O. (2017). Contractual relations in mediation. Scientific and information bulletin of the Ivano-Frankivsk University of Law named after King Danylo Halytskyi. Series: Law, (3 (15)), 175-181. Recovered from https://visnyk.iful.edu.ua/wpcontent/uploads/2019/02/15-26-17.pdf (In Ukrainian)
  27. Vandenhende, L., Warnez, B., & Veny, L. (2016). The Way to Mediation in Belgian Administrative Procedural Law. Netherlands Administrative Law Library, (Februari), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.5553/NALL/.000023
  28. Vértesy, L. (2022). The first codification of the general rules of the state administration procedure, IV of 1957. law (Et.) - The first codification of the general rules of the administrative procedure, Act IV of 1957 (Et.). Public Administration Procedural Law Notices, 2, 15-26. (In Hungarian)