Articles
The current state and problems of scientific communications in Russian language in the CIS countries space
Published 2019-06-25
Keywords
- scientific communications, CIS countries, Russian, questioning.
How to Cite
Maltseva, A., Klyushnikova, E., Gridchina, A., Kuzmina, T., & Petergova, A. (2019). The current state and problems of scientific communications in Russian language in the CIS countries space. Amazonia Investiga, 8(20), 432–450. Retrieved from https://amazoniainvestiga.info/index.php/amazonia/article/view/173
Abstract
The results of the study include the consequences of the researchers survey from the CIS countries, that made it possible to identify the prevalence of scientific communications in Russian language in the CIS countries. Russian-language communications in the field of science, which origins are associated with the times of the USSR, provide an opportunity for the development of integration between countries. As a result of the study, the authors made conclusions on the degree of use of the Russian language in the field of science in various CIS countries, including for publishing articles, preparing dissertations, holding conferences, and informal communication. As a result of the survey and the authors’ analytical work, key problems associated with scientific communications in Russian in the CIS space were identified, and measures for their solution were proposed.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Amelung, N. (2015). Same, same – but different: Public engagement devices enacted by science communication providers, in Studying Science Communication, 12-17
Born, D. (2015) Communicating science, transforming knowledge: Insights into the knowledge communication practices of the popular science magazine GEO, in Studying Science Communication, 28-33
Both, G. (2015). Youtubization of research. Enacting the high tech cowboy through video demonstrations, in Studying Science Communication, 34-27
Chernozub, S.P. (2013). Scientific Communication in Russia in the Age of Information and Communication Technologies, Social Sciences and the modernity, 6, 144-152.
Davies, S.R. (2015). Deficit, deliberation and delight: STS and science Communication, in Studying Science Communication, 7-11
Dudenkova, T.A. (2010). The main models of the relationship between the formal and the non-formal in scientific communication, News of Herzen Russian State Pedagogical University, 124.
Hetland, P. (2015). The communication of scientific knowledge: Between popularization and policy, in Studying Science Communication, 48-50
Hill, M. (2015). Embodiment of science in science slams. A case of informal public science communication, in Studying Science Communication, 18-23
Kuehne, L.M., Twardochleb, L.A., Fritschie, K.J., Mims, M.C., Lawrence, D.J., Gibson, P.P., Stewart-Koster, B., and Olden, J.D. (2014). Practical Science Communication Strategies for Graduate Students, Conservation Biology, 28(5), 1225-1235
Maltseva, A., Barsukova, N., Gridchina, A., and Kuzmina, T. (2017). Analytical review of the contemporary state of the russian scientific organizations from the development management positions, Journal of Applied Economic Sciences, 5 (51), 1531-1548
Maltseva, A., Veselov, I., Monakhov, I., and Karasyova, L. (2017). Evaluation of factors having a significant impact on the development of scientific organizations in the field of engineering, International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, 12(24), 15337-15346
Mamaeva, S.A. (2011). Communicative strategies of scientists, Scientific Periodic: Problems and Solutions, 3, 6-13.
Medin, D.L. and Bang, M. (2014). The cultural side of science communication, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(4)
Medvedeva, S.M. (2014). From scientific creativity to the popularization of science: a theoretical model of scientific communication, Bulletin of MGIMO University, 4(37), 278-284
Reshetnikova, E.V. (2014). Scientific communications: the evolution of forms, principles of organization, Siberian State University of Telecommunications and Informatics, https://sibsutis.ru/upload/publications/9b3/uxofvwfphpyfwz%20nlcieeuzqkvzohdcsxzhccdi.pdf
Rudy, A.Sh. (2012). Scientific communication and the place in it of the concept of sustainability, Omsk Scientific Bulletin, 2 (106), 115-118.
Shirokanova, A.A. (2013). New role and forms of scientific communication in the information age, Sociology, 1, 103-116.
Shubina, N.L. (2009). Scientific communication: the search for a reasonable compromise, News of Herzen Russian State Pedagogical University, 104, 87-96.
Stengler, E. (2015). Science communication in science centres and museums: Return to their core business, in Studying Science Communication, 45-47
Vasilyeva, T. (2013). Russian language in the education system of the CIS and Baltic countries, Almanac «ETHNODIALOGI», 1 (42), 52-60.
V??e, J. (2017). Motivating factors for science communication in Latvia, CBU International Conference Proceedings, Vol. 5; doi:10.12955/cbup.v5.1042
Vydrin, O.V. (2009). Scientific communication: to the research methodology, Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University, 42(180), 112-117
Zamoshchansky, I.I., Konashkova, A.M., Krasavin, I.V., Pyr'yanova, O.A. (2016). Scientific communications: a scientist in modern society, Proceedings of the Ural Federal University. Series 3: General Sciences, 146(1), 30-41.
Zubov, A. (2016). Do the Russian language is need in the CIS countries? Fund to support and protect the rights of compatriots living abroad. URL: http://pravfond.ru/?module=articles&action=view&id=2010
The concept of state support and promotion of the Russian language abroad: approved by the President of the Russian Federation 03.11.2015, No. Pr-2283. URL: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_188569/
Born, D. (2015) Communicating science, transforming knowledge: Insights into the knowledge communication practices of the popular science magazine GEO, in Studying Science Communication, 28-33
Both, G. (2015). Youtubization of research. Enacting the high tech cowboy through video demonstrations, in Studying Science Communication, 34-27
Chernozub, S.P. (2013). Scientific Communication in Russia in the Age of Information and Communication Technologies, Social Sciences and the modernity, 6, 144-152.
Davies, S.R. (2015). Deficit, deliberation and delight: STS and science Communication, in Studying Science Communication, 7-11
Dudenkova, T.A. (2010). The main models of the relationship between the formal and the non-formal in scientific communication, News of Herzen Russian State Pedagogical University, 124.
Hetland, P. (2015). The communication of scientific knowledge: Between popularization and policy, in Studying Science Communication, 48-50
Hill, M. (2015). Embodiment of science in science slams. A case of informal public science communication, in Studying Science Communication, 18-23
Kuehne, L.M., Twardochleb, L.A., Fritschie, K.J., Mims, M.C., Lawrence, D.J., Gibson, P.P., Stewart-Koster, B., and Olden, J.D. (2014). Practical Science Communication Strategies for Graduate Students, Conservation Biology, 28(5), 1225-1235
Maltseva, A., Barsukova, N., Gridchina, A., and Kuzmina, T. (2017). Analytical review of the contemporary state of the russian scientific organizations from the development management positions, Journal of Applied Economic Sciences, 5 (51), 1531-1548
Maltseva, A., Veselov, I., Monakhov, I., and Karasyova, L. (2017). Evaluation of factors having a significant impact on the development of scientific organizations in the field of engineering, International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, 12(24), 15337-15346
Mamaeva, S.A. (2011). Communicative strategies of scientists, Scientific Periodic: Problems and Solutions, 3, 6-13.
Medin, D.L. and Bang, M. (2014). The cultural side of science communication, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(4)
Medvedeva, S.M. (2014). From scientific creativity to the popularization of science: a theoretical model of scientific communication, Bulletin of MGIMO University, 4(37), 278-284
Reshetnikova, E.V. (2014). Scientific communications: the evolution of forms, principles of organization, Siberian State University of Telecommunications and Informatics, https://sibsutis.ru/upload/publications/9b3/uxofvwfphpyfwz%20nlcieeuzqkvzohdcsxzhccdi.pdf
Rudy, A.Sh. (2012). Scientific communication and the place in it of the concept of sustainability, Omsk Scientific Bulletin, 2 (106), 115-118.
Shirokanova, A.A. (2013). New role and forms of scientific communication in the information age, Sociology, 1, 103-116.
Shubina, N.L. (2009). Scientific communication: the search for a reasonable compromise, News of Herzen Russian State Pedagogical University, 104, 87-96.
Stengler, E. (2015). Science communication in science centres and museums: Return to their core business, in Studying Science Communication, 45-47
Vasilyeva, T. (2013). Russian language in the education system of the CIS and Baltic countries, Almanac «ETHNODIALOGI», 1 (42), 52-60.
V??e, J. (2017). Motivating factors for science communication in Latvia, CBU International Conference Proceedings, Vol. 5; doi:10.12955/cbup.v5.1042
Vydrin, O.V. (2009). Scientific communication: to the research methodology, Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University, 42(180), 112-117
Zamoshchansky, I.I., Konashkova, A.M., Krasavin, I.V., Pyr'yanova, O.A. (2016). Scientific communications: a scientist in modern society, Proceedings of the Ural Federal University. Series 3: General Sciences, 146(1), 30-41.
Zubov, A. (2016). Do the Russian language is need in the CIS countries? Fund to support and protect the rights of compatriots living abroad. URL: http://pravfond.ru/?module=articles&action=view&id=2010
The concept of state support and promotion of the Russian language abroad: approved by the President of the Russian Federation 03.11.2015, No. Pr-2283. URL: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_188569/
