Online practicum and teacher efficacy: correlation, challenges, and lessons arising from Covid-19 pandemic

Keywords: Instructional strategies, online-based practicum, school-based practicum, self-efficacy, student engagement.

Abstract

This study examined the influence of teaching practicum on preservice teachers’ sense of self-efficacy during the covid-19 pandemic. In particular, the study sort to establish if both online and school-based teaching practicums have the same influence on the preservice teachers self-efficacy. A questionnaire was used to collect data from 40 preservice teachers, 2 of them were also interviewed for further insight into the answers provided. It was found that the preservice teachers’ sense of self-efficacy was at best “average” during the pandemic time, with online-based practicum teachers showing a slightly stronger self-efficacy overall. However, school-based practicum teachers showed higher self-efficacy in classroom management and student engagement. The slight differences in efficacy levels were found not to be statistically significant to cause a difference in opinion between online teaching practicum and school-based teaching practicum. Possible reasons for general low levels of self-efficacy were discussed, and causes for slightly higher efficacy for online-based practicum also suggested.  

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

David Wafula Waswa, Tishk International University, Erbil, Iraq.

Tishk International University, Erbil, Iraq.

Suleyman Celik, Tishk International University, Erbil, Iraq.

Tishk International University, Erbil, Iraq.

References

Armor, D., Conroy-Oseguera, P., Cox, M., King, N., McDonnell, L., Pascal, A., Pauly, E., & Zellman, G. (1976). Analysis of the school preferred reading programs in selected Los Angeles minority schools (Rep. No. R-2007-LAUSD). Santa Monica, CA: RAND. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 130 243)

Atay, D. (2007). Beginning teacher efficacy and the practicum in an EFL context. Teacher development, 11(2), 203-219.

Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 191-215.

Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37, 122-147.

Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28(2), 117-148.

Bandura, A. (1996). Self-efficacy in changing societies. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman.

Cantrell, P., Young, S., & Moore, A. (2003). Factors affecting science teaching efficacy of preservice elementary teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 14(3), 177-192.

Çapa, Y. (2005). Factors influencing first-year teachers' sense of efficacy (Doctoral Dissertation), The Ohio State University, Ohio.

Chen, J. (2019). Efficacious and positive teachers achieve more: Examining the relationship between teacher efficacy, emotions, and their practicum performance. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 28(4), 327-337.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.

Dorner, H., & Kumar, S. (2016). Online collaborative mentoring for technology integration in pre-service teacher education. TechTrends, 60(1), 48-55.

Ekici, D. I. (2018). Development of pre-service teachers’ teaching self-efficacy beliefs through an online community of practice. Asia pacific education review, 19(1), 27-40.

Frey, T. (2008). Determining the impact of online practicum facilitation for in-service teachers. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 16(2), 181-210.

Gao, W., & Mager, G. (2011). Enhancing preservice teachers' sense of efficacy and attitudes toward school diversity through preparation: A case of one US inclusive teacher education program. International Journal of Special Education, 26(2), 92-107.

Goktas, Y., Yildirim, S., & Yildirim, Z. (2009). Main barriers and possible enablers of ICTs integration into pre-service teacher education programs. Educational Technology & Society, 12, 193–204.

Gurvitch, R., & Metzler, M. W. (2009). The effects of laboratory-based and field-based practicum experience on pre-service teachers' self-efficacy. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(3), 437-443.

Han, I., & Shin, W. S. (2011). A Multimedia Case-based Environment: Teaching Technology Integration to Pre-service Teachers. Educational Technology International, 12(1), 1–20.

Henson, R. K. (2001). Teacher self-efficacy: Substantive implications and measurement. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/2365774_Teacher_Self-Efficacy_Substantive_Implications_and_Measurement_Dilemmas

Liu, S. H. (2011). Factors related to pedagogical beliefs of teachers and technology integration. Computers & Education, 56, 1012–1022.

Ma, K., & Cavanagh, M. S. (2018). Classroom ready? Pre-service teachers’ self-efficacy for their first professional experience placement. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 43(7), 8.

Mahalingappa, L., Hughes, E. M., & Polat, N. (2018). Developing preservice teachers’ self-efficacy and knowledge through online experiences with English language learners. Language and Education, 32(2), 127-146.

Mergler, A. G., & Tangen, D. (2010). Using microteaching to enhance teacher efficacy in pre‐service teachers. Teaching Education, 21(2), 199-210.

Moulding, L. R., Stewart, P. W., & Dunmeyer, M. L. (2014). Pre-service teachers' sense of efficacy: Relationship to academic ability, student teaching placement characteristics, and mentor support. Teaching and teacher education, 41, 60-66.

Palmer, D.H (2006). Sources of self-efficacy in a science methods course for primary teacher education students. Research in Science Education, 36(4), 337-353, doi:10.1007/s11165-005-9007-0

Russell, M., Bebell, D., O’Dwyer, L., & O’Connor, K. (2003). Examining teacher Technology use: Implications for preservice and in-service teacher preparation. Journal of Teacher Education, 54, 297–310.

Sarfo, F. K., Amankwah, F., Sam, F. K., & Konin, D. (2015). Teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs: The relationship between gender and instructional strategies, classroom management and student engagement. Ghana Journal of Development Studies, 12(1-2), 19-32.

So, H. J., & Kim, B. (2009). Learning about problem based learning: Student teachers integrating technology, pedagogy and content knowledge. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25, 101–116.

Sokal, L., Woloshyn, D., & Funk-Unrau, S. (2013). How important is practicum to pre-service teacher development for inclusive teaching? Effects on efficacy in classroom management. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 59(2), 285-298.

Tschannen-Moran, M., Hoy, A. W., & Hoy, W. K. (1998). Teacher efficacy: Its meaning and measure. Review of educational research, 68(2), 202-248.

Yüksel, H. G. (2014). Becoming a teacher: tracing changes in pre-service English as a foreign language teachers' sense of efficacy. South African Journal of Education, 34(3).
Published
2021-06-29
How to Cite
Wafula Waswa, D., & Celik, S. (2021). Online practicum and teacher efficacy: correlation, challenges, and lessons arising from Covid-19 pandemic. Amazonia Investiga, 10(41), 19-29. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2021.41.05.2
Section
Articles
Bookmark and Share