Una evaluación del concepto de alienación en las teorías marxistas

Autores/as

  • Abbas Naeemi Jourshari Department of Social Science, Kooshyar higher education institute, Rasht, Iran.
  • Seyedeh Sedigheh Haghighat Department of Social Science, Kooshyar higher education institute, Rasht, Iran.

Palabras clave:

Alienación, Marxismo, Marx, Lukacs, Gramsci, Fromm, Haberma

Resumen

La alienación es uno de los conceptos importantes de la ciencia social que ha sido más estudiado en la idealología del marxismo. El objetivo principal del presente artículo es revisar la opinión de los sociólogos marxistas sobre la alienación. Este artículo se ha compilado para responder a la siguiente pregunta: ¿Qué es la autoalienación y cuál es la opinión de los marxistas sobre este concepto complejo? Con respecto a este asunto, al revisar la historia de la Alienación y sus dimensiones conceptuales, se examinan las teorías de Karl Marx, George Lukacs, Antonio Gramsci, Erich Fromm y Jurgen Habermas. El método de investigación utilizado en esta investigación es descriptivo y el método de recopilación de datos es bibliotecario. La tabla de hallazgos se representa al final del documento.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Biografía del autor/a

Abbas Naeemi Jourshari, Department of Social Science, Kooshyar higher education institute, Rasht, Iran.

Professor, Department of Social Science, Kooshyar higher education institute, Rasht, Iran.

Seyedeh Sedigheh Haghighat, Department of Social Science, Kooshyar higher education institute, Rasht, Iran.

M.A Student, Department of Social Science, Kooshyar higher education institute, Rasht, Iran.

Citas

1. Kon, I. S. (1967). The concept of alienation in modern sociology. Social Research, 34(3), 507.

2. Plasek, W. (1974). Marxist and American sociological conceptions of alienation: implications for social problems theory. Social Problems, 21(3), 316-328.

3. Archibald, W. P. (1976). Using Marx’s theory of alienation empirically. In Theories of Alienation (pp. 59-74). Springer, Boston, MA.

4. Frisby, D. (2013). The Alienated Mind (Routledge Revivals): The Sociology of Knowledge in Germany 1918-1933. Routledge.

5. Yuill, C. (2011). Forgetting and remembering alienation theory. History of the Human Sciences, 24(2), 103-119.

6. Rigauer, B. (2000). Marxist theories. Handbook of sports studies, 28-47.

7. Geyer, R. F., & Heinz, W. R. (Eds.). (1992). Alienation, society, and the individual: Continuity and change in theory and research (Vol. 11, No. 6-8). Transaction Publishers.

8. Musto, M. (2013). Revisiting Marx’s concept of alienation. In Marx for Today (pp. 102-126).
Routledge.

9. Salleh, A. (2003). Ecofeminism as sociology. Capitalism Nature Socialism, 14(1), 61-74.

10. Seeman, M. (1959). On the meaning of alienation. American sociological review, 783-791.

11. Kanungo, R. N. (1979). The concepts of alienation and involvement revisited. Psychological bulletin, 86(1), 119.

12. Williamson, I., & Cullingford, C. (1997). The uses and misuses of ‘alienation’in the social sciences and education. British journal of educational studies, 45(3), 263-275.

13. Case, J. M. (2008). Alienation and engagement: Development of an alternative theoretical framework for understanding student learning. Higher Education, 55(3), 321-332.

14. Mouton, J., & Marais, H. C. (1988). Basic concepts in the methodology of the social sciences. HSRC Press.

15. Horowitz, I. L. (1966). On alienation and the social order. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 27(2), 230-237.

16. Scott, M. B. (1963). The social sources of alienation. Inquiry, 6(1-4), 57-69.

17. Kohn, M. L. (1976). Occupational structure and alienation. American Journal of Sociology, 82(1), 111-130.

18. Miller, J. (1975). Isolation in organizations: Alienation from authority, control, and expressive relations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 260-271.

19. Fischer, C. S. (1976). Alienation: trying to bridge the chasm. The British journal of sociology, 27(1), 35-49.

20. Martin, W. C., Bengtson, V. L., & Acock, A. C. (1974). Alienation and age: A context-specific approach. Social Forces, 53(2), 266-274.

21. Ziller, R. C. (2013). The Social Self: Pergamon General Psychology Series (Vol. 18). Elsevier.

22. Templeton, F. (1966). Alienation and political participation: Some research findings. Public Opinion Quarterly, 30(2), 249-261.

23. Williams, R., & Williams, R. H. (1977). Marxism and literature (Vol. 392). Oxford Paperbacks.

24. Cox, T., & Littlejohn, G. (2015). Kritsman and the Agrarian Marxists (RLE Marxism). Routledge.

25. Chun-hua, W. A. N. G. (2009). A Brief Analysis of Problems and causes in Idealogical Political Education for the College Student's Pioneering Work [J]. Journal of Zunyi Normal College, 4.

26. Corcoran, P. E. (1990). Introduction Karl Marx and historical inquiry.

27. Naarden, B. (1990). Marx and Russia. History of European ideas, 12(6), 783-797.

28. Gottheil, F. M. (1986). Marx versus Marxists on the role of military production in capitalist economies. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 8(4), 563-573.

29. Roemer, J. E. (1985). Should Marxists be interested in exploitation?. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 30-65.

30. Roemer, J. E. (1985). Should Marxists be interested in exploitation?. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 30-65.

31. Kingston, P. W. (1986, September). Resistance theory: How Marxists interpret student life. In Sociological Forum (Vol. 1, No. 4, pp. 717-725). Springer Netherlands.

32. Bradshaw, A. (1976). A Critique of Steven Lukes'Power: A Radical View'. Sociology, 10(1), 121-127.

33. Gurevitch, M., Bennett, T., Curran, J., & Woollacott, J. (Eds.). (1982). Culture, society and the media (Vol. 759). London: Methuen.

Descargas

Publicado

2019-02-27

Cómo citar

Jourshari, A. N., & Haghighat, S. S. (2019). Una evaluación del concepto de alienación en las teorías marxistas. Amazonia Investiga, 8(18), 471–482. Recuperado a partir de https://amazoniainvestiga.info/index.php/amazonia/article/view/360

Número

Sección

Articles