Comparative analysis of the feeling of subjective well-being and resilience of repatriates

Galina A. Epanchintseva; Tatyana V. Bendas; Lydmila V. Zubova; Tatyana N. Kozlovskaya

Galina A. Epanchintseva Orenburg State University, Orenburg, Russian Federation
Tatyana V. Bendas Petersburg State Transport University Saint-Petersburg, Russian Federation
Lydmila V. Zubova Orenburg State University, Orenburg, Russian Federation
Tatyana N. Kozlovskaya Orenburg State University, Orenburg, Russian Federation

Keywords: Subjective well-being, satisfaction, adaptation, readaptation, repatriate, resilience.

Abstract

The authors emphasize the relevance of the study by psychologists of the problem experiences of well-being and distress of individuals, in the need to adapt to an ever-changing world, oversaturated with information. At the same time, many people are forced to change the place of residence and living conditions. In addition, in this regard it is important to investigate factors of feeling of subjective well-being of these people, and well as their overall satisfaction with life. The authors presented a brief transactional analysis of the state of scientific problem feeling subjective well-being. The problem field of empirical research is outlined research in establishing links with satisfaction with life and the vitality of the personality of repatriates from different countries. Correctly, a sample of the study was formed, reliable and valid ones were selected psychodiagnostic methods, logically presented stages of the study. Qualitative analysis of empirical data is based on evidence-based methods of statistical thesaurus. Key findings of the study on seniority residence of immigrants in the new country, the level of resilience and psychological well-being, will allow formulating a step-by-step the program of psychological support for immigrants experiencing dissatisfaction with living conditions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Galina A. Epanchintseva, Orenburg State University, Orenburg, Russian Federation

Doctor of Psychological Sciences, Professor Orenburg State University, Orenburg, Russian Federation

Tatyana V. Bendas, Petersburg State Transport University Saint-Petersburg, Russian Federation

Doctor of Psychological Sciences, Professor Emperor Alexander I ST. Petersburg State Transport University Saint-Petersburg, Russian Federation

Lydmila V. Zubova, Orenburg State University, Orenburg, Russian Federation

Doctor of Psychological Sciences, Professor Orenburg State University, Orenburg, Russian Federation

Tatyana N. Kozlovskaya, Orenburg State University, Orenburg, Russian Federation

Candidate of Pedagogical Sciences, Associate Professor Orenburg State University, Orenburg, Russian Federation

References

1. Shamionov, R. M., Beskova, T. V. (2018) Methods of diagnostics of subjective well-being of personality. Psychological Researches. Vol. 11, № 60: 8.

2. Galiahmetova, L. I. (2015) Well-being, subjective well-being, life satisfaction: the problem of interaction. Vesting Bashkir’s. UN-TA. Vol. 20, № 3: 1114-1118.

3. Timofeeva, Y. I. (2014) Subjective well-being of an individual in society. Society and continuous well-being of a person collection of scientific works of the international scientific Symposium "Society and continuous well-being of a person". National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University: 265-269.

4. Korzun, O. (2018) How to move to another country and not die of homesickness. Publishing Solutions. URL: https://mybook.ru/author/oksana-korzun/kak-pereehat-v-druguyu-stranu-i-ne-umeret-ot-toski/

5. Piterova, A.Y. (2014) Cultural shock: features and ways to overcome. Science. Society. State. No. 4. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/kulturnyy-shok-osobennosti-i-puti-preodoleniya

6. Kahneman, D., Tversky, A. (2003) Rational choice, values and frames. Psychological Journal. Vol. 24, № 4: 31-42.

7. Orlova, D. G. (2015) Psychological and subjective well-being: definition, structure, research (review of contemporary sources). Bulletin of PERM. Series 1. Psychological and pedagogical Sciences. No. 1. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/psihologicheskoe-i-subektivnoe-blagopoluchie-opredelenie-struktura-issledovaniya-obzor-sovremennyh-istochnikov

8. Block, J. H., & Block, J. (1980) The role of ego-control and ego-resiliency in the organization of behavior. In W. A. Collins (Ed.), Development of cognition, affect and social relations: The Minnesota symposia on child psychology Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Vol. 13: 39-101.

9. Diener, E., Scollon, C. N., & Lucas, R. E. (2003) The Evolving Concept of Subjective Well-Being: The Multifaceted Nature of Happiness. Advances in Cell Aging and Gerontology, 15: 187-219. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2354-4_4

10. Strack, F., Argyle M., Schwarz, N. (Eds.) (1991) Happiness is the frequency, not the intensity, of positive versus negative affect. Subjective well-being: An interdisciplinary perspective. Oxford, England: Pergamon Press: 119-139.

11. Kahneman, D. (2000) Experienced utility and objective happiness: A moment-based approach. (Eds.)/ New York: Cambridge University Press and the Russell Sage Foundation, Chapter 37:673-692 URL: http://static.stevereads.com/papers_to_read/experienced_utility_and_
objective_happiness_a_moment-based_approach.pdf

12. Lucas, R. E., Diener, E., Suh, E. (1996) Discriminant validity of well-being measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 71: 616 – 628.

13. Lucas, R., Diener, E., Richard E. Lucas. (2007) The optimum level of well-being: Can people be too happy? Perspectives on Psychological Science. URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00048.x

14. Stile, Charlotte. (2013) Positive psychology. What makes us happy, optimistic and motivated / per. with English. M. Chomakhidze-Doronina; scientific. ed. T. Bazarov. - Moscow: Pretext: 220.

15. Maddi, S. R. (1968) Personality theories: a comparative analysis, Homewood: Dorsey Press: 15-68.