The challenges of restorative justice and executive strategies in Iran,s penal system abstract
Abstract
The criticisms of the classical criminal justice system and the general perception of the inability of the system in the seventies and eighties led to a sudden increase in the rate of crime and the creation of new alternative ideas, in which a new approach was created. This new approach was called restorative justice. Restorative justice has a new approach to crime, punishment, victim, offender, and seeks to repair damaged relationships between victim, offender and society. In this approach, all parties involved in a criminal act come together to discuss the consequences of crime, and interact with each other to deal with the consequences of a crime. The implementation of restorative justice and its mechanisms will allow the offender to correct himself, such as the suspension and conditional release. In order to implement the rules of restorative justice in the society with the potential of the cultural capital, it is possible, with the trust of the victim, with the implementation of restorative rules in a long time to repair, compensate and correct the damage caused by the crime of the victim and the offender. In Iran, for the sake of Nile The aims of restorative justice are to support methods and institutions to repair damages to the victim.
But in this judicial system, the process of restorative justice has always faced challenges in practice. One of the most important challenges facing the implementation of restorative justice in Iran's legal system relates to judicial challenges.
One of the most important challenges facing the implementation of restorative justice in Iran's legal system relates to judicial challenges. This has led to the failure to implement the ultimate goals of restorative justice, as well as the density of cases and cases in the judiciary.
This article examines some of the challenges of restorative justice, as well as providing judicial solutions to the implementation of restorative justice mechanisms in Iran's legal system. The method used in this essay is a descriptive and analytical study using the library's method of collecting information to examine the judicial challenges of restorative justice and its solutions in the Iranian judicial system.
Downloads
References
Abbasi, M. (2003b). New Horizons of Restorative Justice in Criminal Mediation, Tehran] Publishing Daneshvar, First Edition
Cheraghi Navid, Z. (2016). Challenges and obstacles to the implementation of restorative justice in Iranian criminal system, Master's thesis, Shahid Ashrafi University of Isfahan, p. 57
Gholami, H. (2006). Restorative Justice, Publication of the Party
LIewellyn, Jennefer J .& Hows, Robert. (1998). RESTORATIVE JUSTICE A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK , 84 pages.
Najafi Brand Abadi, A.H. (2004). from classic criminal justice to restorative justice, Journal of Law and Judgment, Shahrivar 2004, p. 20
Van ness, Daniell w. (1993). New Wine And Old WineskIns : four challengs of Retorative justice, Criminal Law Forum, 4 , CRIM . L . F ., PP, pp.251-79
Wright, Martin, Marshall, Tony and others. (2005). Restorative justice, translation by Amir Samawati Pirouz, Khalilian Publications, p. 13