Vol. 14 No. 85 (2025)
Articles

Sustainability assessment on the campus of a higher education institution using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP)

Maricela Cuellar-Orozco
Instituto Politécnico Nacional, ESIME Zacatenco, Ciudad de México, México.
Author Biography

Doctora en Ciencias en Administración, Profesor Investigador en el Instituto Politécnico Nacional, ESIME Zacatenco, Ciudad de México, México.

Valentín Buján Tinoco
Instituto Politécnico Nacional, CECyT No. 2 Miguel Bernard, Ciudad de México, México.
Author Biography

Doctorado en Ciencias en Administración, Profesor Investigador en el Instituto Politécnico Nacional, CECyT No. 2 Miguel Bernard, Ciudad de México, México.

Armando Cuellar-Orozco
Tecnológico Nacional de México, TES de Cuautitlán Izcalli, Estado de México, México.
Author Biography

Maestro en Ciencias en Ingeniería en Sistemas, Profesor Titular en el Tecnológico Nacional de México, TES de Cuautitlán Izcalli, Estado de México, México.

Julián Patiño-Ortiz
Instituto Politécnico Nacional, ESIME Zacatenco, Ciudad de México, México.
Author Biography

Doctor en Ciencias en Ingeniería Mecánica y Doctor en Ciencias en Administración, Profesor Investigador en el Instituto Politécnico Nacional, ESIME Zacatenco, Ciudad de México, México.

Miguel Patiño-Ortiz
Instituto Politécnico Nacional, SEPI ESIME Zacatenco, Ciudad de México, México.
Author Biography

Doctor en Ciencias en Ingeniería Mecánica, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Profesor Investigador de la SEPI ESIME Zacatenco, Ciudad de México, México.

Published 2025-01-30

Keywords

  • Sustainability Management, Higher Education Institutions, Evaluation Capacity Buiding, Analytic Hierarchy Process.

How to Cite

Cuellar-Orozco, M., Buján Tinoco, V., Cuellar-Orozco, A., Patiño-Ortiz, J., & Patiño-Ortiz, M. (2025). Sustainability assessment on the campus of a higher education institution using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). Amazonia Investiga, 14(85), 58–83. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2025.85.01.5

Abstract

Higher Education Institutions (IES) play a fundamental role in implementing sustainable development practices by promoting the development of green campus. This implementation must use a systemic approach that allows the definition of representative dimensions. Different tools that allow evaluation with an integrated vision have been considered and used, as well as incorporating key components in the evaluation through the Evaluation Capacity Building (ECB). The objective of the study is to evaluate and compare the implementation of sustainable development that exists on the campus of a Mexican IES. The framework integrates the Delphi method to collect data and AHP for data analysis, both methods seals effective sustainability criteria.The results indicate the possibility of identifying and analyzing the sustainable activities in each campus to manage them and implement new criteria and indicators, the attributes of the ECB perceived as important were performed conveniently, while those perceived with less importance are identified as deficient in their performance, among the findings was found that the main criterion for developing sustainability is the environmental management factor. The study expects to contribute to the use of sustainability evaluation tools as promoters so that IES improve their sustainable performance and the practice of the ECB as an innovative agent that continuously promotes the use of these evaluations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Abdullah, W. S. (2020). Optimizing social sustainability in walkable university campus: A comparison between the old and new campuses of Sulaimani University. Amazonia Investiga, 9(34), 44–56. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2020.34.10.5
  2. Alghamdi, N., den Heijer, A., & de Jonge, H. (2017). Assessment tools’ indicators for sustainability in universities: an analytical overview. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 18(1), 84-115. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-04-2015-0071
  3. Alshehri, S.A., Rezgui, Y., & Li, H. (2015). Disaster community resilience assessment method: a consensus-based Delphi and AHP approach. Natural Hazards, 78, 395–416. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-1719-5
  4. Beynaghi, A., Trencher, G., Moztarzadeh, F., Mozafari, M., Maknoon, R., & Leal Filho, W. (2016). Future sustainability scenarios for universities: moving beyond the United Nations Decade of Education for Sustainable Development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112(4), 3464-3478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.10.117
  5. Boyle, R., Lemaire, D., & Rist, R. (1999). Introduction: Building Evaluation Capacity. New Brunswick, NJ, Transaction Publishers
  6. Caeiro, S., Sandoval Hamón, L.A., Martins, R., & Bayas Aldaz, C.E. (2020). Sustainability Assessment and Benchmarking in Higher Education Institutions - A Critical Reflection. Sustainability, 12(2), 543. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12020543
  7. Calder, W., & Clugston, R.M. (2005). Editorial: Education for a Sustainable Future. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 29(1), 7-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098260500030231
  8. Ceulemans, K., Molderez, I., & Van Liedekerke, L. (2015). Sustainability reporting in higher education: A comprehensive review of the recent literature and paths for further research. Journal of Cleaner Production, 106, 127-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.052
  9. Chen S.Q., Lu M.Y., Tan H.W., Luo, X.Y., & Ge, J. (2019). Assessing sustainability on Chinese university campuses: Development of a campus sustainability evaluation system and its application with a case study. Journal of Building Engineering, 24, 100747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2019.100747
  10. Chen, K.H.J. (2017). Contextual influence on evaluation capacity building in a rapidly changing environment under new governmental policies. Evaluation and Program Planning, 65, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2017.06.001
  11. Clark, I. (2012). Formative Assessment: Assessment Is for Self-regulated Learning. Educational Psychology Review, 24(2), 205-249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-011-9191-6
  12. Cloquell Ballester, V.A., Cloquell-Ballester, V.A., Monterde-Díaz, R., & Santamarina-Siurana, M.C. (2006). Indicators validation for the improvement of environmental and social impact quantitative assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 26(1), 79-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2005.06.002
  13. Cooper, S.M., & Owen, D.L. (2007). Corporate social reporting and stakeholder accountability: the missing link. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32(7-8), 649-667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2007.02.001
  14. Cortese, A.D. (2003). The Critical Role of Higher Education in Creating a Sustainable Future. Planning for Higher Education, 31(3), 15–22.
  15. Daub, C.H. (2007). Assessing the quality of sustainability reporting: an alternative methodological approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 15(1), 75-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.08.013
  16. Disterheft, A., Caeiro, S.S., Ramos, M.R., & Azeiteiro, U.M. (2012). Environmental management systems (EMS) implementation processes and practices in European higher education institutions: top-down versus participatory approaches. Journal of Cleaner Production, 31, 80-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.02.034
  17. Donnelly, A., Jones, M., O’Mahony, T., & Byrne, G. (2007). Selecting environmental indicator for use in strategic environmental assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 27, 161-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2006.10.006
  18. Dumay, J. (2016). A critical reflection on the future of intellectual capital: From reporting to disclosure. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 17, 168-184. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-08-2015-0072
  19. Fleming, M.L., & Easton, J. (2010). Building environmental educators’ evaluation capacity through distance education. Evaluation and Program Planning, 33(2), 172-177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2009.07.007
  20. Gamage, P., & Sciulli, N. (2016). Sustainability Reporting by Australian Universities. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 76(2), 187-203. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.12215
  21. Gibson, R.B. (2013). Why Sustainability Assessment? In Sustainability Assessment: Pluralism, Practice and Progress. Routledge: New York, NY, USA.
  22. Hák, T., Janoušková, S., & Moldan, B. (2016). Sustainable development goals: a need for relevant indicators. Ecological Indicators, 60, 565-573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.08.003
  23. Hokkaido University (2023). Hokkaido University Sustainability Report 2023. Disponible en: https://www.sustainability.hokudai.ac.jp/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/hokudai_sustaina2023A4fix_en.pdf
  24. Holdsworth, S., & Thomas, I. (2020). Competencies or capabilities in the Australian higher education landscape and its implications for the development and delivery of sustainability education. Higher Education Research & Development, 40(7), 1466-1481. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1830038
  25. Howlett, C., Ferreira, J.A., & Blomfield, J. (2016). Teaching sustainable development in higher education: Building critical, reflective thinkers through an interdisciplinary approach. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 17(3), 305-321. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-07-2014-0102
  26. Ivanchuk, S., Kakhiani, Y., Hryboiedova, T., Bilychenko, H., & Huzii, I. (2024). Policy for the formation of social consciousness during students training in educational institutions: pedagogical aspect. Amazonia Investiga, 13(73), 387-400. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2024.73.01.32
  27. Julnes, G. (2019). Evaluating sustainability: Controversies, challenges, and opportunities. In G. Julnes (Ed.), Evaluating Sustainability: Evaluative Support for Managing Processes in the Public Interest. New Directions for Evaluation, 162, 13–28. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.20361
  28. Kamijo, T., & Huang, G. (2016). Improving the quality of environmental impacts assessment reports: effectiveness of alternatives analysis and public involvement in JICA supported projects. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 34(2), 143-151. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2016.1176402
  29. Karam, A., Hussein, M., & Reinau, K.H. (2021). Analysis of the barriers to implementing horizontal collaborative transport using a hybrid fuzzy Delphi-AHP approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 321, 128943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128943.
  30. Kim, M., Jang, Y.C., & Lee, S. (2013). Application of Delphi-AHP methods to select the priorities of WEEE for recycling in a waste management decision-making tool. Journal of Environmental Management, 128, 941-948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.06.049
  31. Klier, S.D., Nawrotzki, R.J., Salas-Rodríguez, N., Harten, S., Keating, C.B., & Katina, P.F. (2022). Grounding evaluation capacity development in systems theory. Evaluation, 28(2), 231-251. https://doi.org/10.1177/13563890221088871
  32. Leal Filho, W., & Brandli, L. (2016). Engaging Stakeholders in Education for Sustainable Development at University Level. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26734-0_21
  33. Leal Filho, W., Skanavis, C., Kounani, A., Londero L.B., Shiel, C., do Paço, A., Pace, P., Mifsud, M., Beynaghi, A., Price, E., Salvia, A.L., Will, M., & Shula, K. (2019). The role of planning in implementing sustainable development in a higher education context. Journal of Cleaner Production, 235, 678-687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.322
  34. Levine, R., Russ-Eft, D., Burling, A., Stephens, J., & Downey, J. (2013). Evaluating health services research capacity building programs: Implications for health services and human resource development. Evaluation and Program Planning, 37, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2012.12.002
  35. Lozano, R. (2006a). Incorporation and institutionalization of SD into universities: breaking through barriers to change. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14(9-11), 787-796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.12.010
  36. Lozano, R. (2006b). Tool for a Graphical Assessment of Sustainability in Universities (GASU). Journal of Cleaner Production, 14(9-11), 963-972. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.11.041
  37. Lozano, R. (2010). Diffusion of sustainable development in universities' curricula: an empirical example from Cardiff University. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(7), 637-644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.07.005
  38. Lozano, R. (2011). The state of sustainability reporting in universities. International Journal for Sustainability in Higher Education, 12(1), 67-78. https://doi.org/10.1108/14676371111098311
  39. Lozano, R., Lukman, R., Lozano, F.J., Huisingh, D., & Lambrechts, W. (2013). Declarations for sustainability in higher education: becoming better leaders, through addressing the university system. Journal of Cleaner Production, 48, 10-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.10.006
  40. Mahato, S., Machtmes, K., & Cohen, B. (2022). Leveraging Mixed Methods Designs for Promoting Evaluation and Evaluation Capacity Building. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 36(3), 365-375. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjpe.71288
  41. Mascarenhas, A., Nunes, L.M., & Ramos, T.B. (2015). Selection of sustainability indicators for planning: Combining stakeholders’ participation and data reduction techniques. Journal of Cleaner Production, 92, 295–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.01.005
  42. Menon S., & Suresh, M. (2022). Development of assessment framework for environmental sustainability in higher education institutions. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 23(7), 1445-1468. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-07-2021-0310
  43. Milstein, B., & Cotton, D. (2000). Defining concepts for the presidential strand on building evaluation capacity. Fairhaven, MA: American Evaluation Association
  44. Milstein, B., Chapel, T.J., Wetterhall, S.F., & Cotton, D.A. (2002). Building capacity for program evaluation at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. New Directions for Evaluation, (93), 27-46. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.40
  45. Min, J.C.H. (2016). Guiding the guides: Developing indicators of tour guides’ service quality. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 27(910), 1043–1062. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 14783363.2015.1060123
  46. Mischen, P. A., Homsy, G. C., Lipo, C. P., Holahan, R., Imbruce, V., Pape, A., Zhu, W., Graney, J., Zhang, Z., Holmes, L. M., & Reina, M. (2019). A Foundation for Measuring Community Sustainability. Sustainability, 11(7), 1903. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11071903
  47. Mokski, E., Leal Filho, W., Sehnem, S., & Andrade Guerra, J.B.S.O.D. (2023). Education for sustainable development in higher education institutions: an approach for effective interdisciplinarity. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 24(1), 96-117. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-07-2021-0306
  48. Montreal University (2020). Sustainable development at l’Université de Montréal, Strategic Plan 2021-2023, transition to sustainable campuses. Disponible en: https://www.umontreal.ca/public/www/images/developpement-durable/ANG_UdeM_Sunstainability_strategy.pdf
  49. Mori, K., & Christodoulou, A. (2012). Review of sustainability indices and indicators: to- wards a new City Sustainability Index (CSI). Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 32(1), 94-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2011.06.001
  50. Naccarella, L., Pirkis, J., Kohn, F., Morley, B., Burgess, P., & Blashki, G. (2007). Building evaluation capacity: Definitional and practical implications for an Australian case study. Evaluation and Program Planning, 30(3), 231–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2007.05.001
  51. Niedlich, S., Kummer, B., Bauer, M., Rieckmann, M., & Bormann, I. (2020). Cultures of sustainability governance in higher education institutions: A multi-case study of dimensions and implications. Higher Education Quarterly, 74(4), 373-390. https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12237
  52. Preskill, H., & Boyle, S. (2008). A Multidisciplinary Model of Evaluation Capacity Building. American Journal of Evaluation, 29(4), 443-459. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214008324182
  53. Promentillaa, M.A.B., Avisoa, K.B., Lucas, R.I.G., Razona, L.F., & Tana, R.R. (2018). Teaching Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) in undergraduate chemical engineering courses. Education for Chemical Engineers, 23, 34-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ece.2018.05.002
  54. Rossa, T., & Mischen, P. (2022). Measuring the impact of organizational characteristics on the sustainability performance of US institutions of higher education. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 23(7) 1543-1559. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-08-2021-0355
  55. Ruggerio, C.A. (2021). Sustainability and sustainable development: A review of principles and definitions. Science of The Total Environment, 786, 147481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147481
  56. Saaty, T.L. (1977). A Scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 15(3), 234-281.
  57. Sayed, A., Kamal M.D., & Asmuss, M. (2013). Benchmarking tools for assessing and tracking sustainability in higher educational institutions: Identifying an effective tool for the University of Saskatchewan. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 4(4), 449-465. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-08-2011-0052
  58. SEP (2023). Quinto Informe de Labores. DGPPYEE-SEP, México. Disponible en: https://www.planeacion.sep.gob.mx/Doc/informes/labores/2018-2024/5to_informe_de_labores.pdf
  59. Shriberg, M. (2002). Institutional assessment tools for sustainability in higher education: strengths, weaknesses, and implications for practice and theory. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 3(3), 254-270. https://doi.org/10.1108/14676370210434714
  60. Shuqin, C., Minyan, L., Hongwei, T., Xiaoyu, L., & Jian, G. (2019). Assessing sustainability on Chinese university campuses: Development of a campus sustainability evaluation system and its application with a case study. Journal of Building Engineering, 24, 100747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2019.100747
  61. Stephens, J.C., Hernandez, M.E., Román, M., Graham, A.C., & Scholz, R.W. (2008). Higher education as a change agent for sustainability in different cultures and contexts. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 9(3), 317-338. https://doi.org/10.1108/14676370810885916
  62. Sutter, A., Rondeau, M., Kaminska, K., Desforges, S., Betzer, S., & Tremblay, M. (2024). Developing Evaluation Capacity Building Competencies: Participant Reflections From the Evaluation Capacity Case Challenge. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 38(3), 532–541. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjpe-2024-0004
  63. Tan, H., Chen, S., Shi, Q., & Wang, L. (2014). Development of green campus in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 64, 646-653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.10.019
  64. Turcu, C. (2013). Re-thinking sustainability indicators: local perspectives of urban sustainability. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 56(5), 695-719. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2012.698984
  65. Van Nguyen, T.A., Tucek, D., & Pham, N.T. (2023). Indicators for TQM 4.0 model: Delphi Method and Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) analysis. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 34, 1-2, 220-234. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2022.2039062
  66. Verma, P., & Raghubanshi, A.S. (2018). Urban sustainability indicators: Challenges and opportunities. Ecological Indicators, 93, 282-291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.05.007.
  67. Wade, J., & Kallemeyn, L. (2020). Evaluation capacity building (ECB) interventions and the development of sustainable evaluation practice: An exploratory study. Evaluation and Program Planning, 79, 101777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2019.101777
  68. Whitaker, R. (2007). Validation examples of the Analytic Hierarchy Process and Analytic Network Process. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 46(7–8), v840-859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2007.03.018.
  69. Windt, Y., & Saaty, T.L. (1980). Marketing applicatons of the analytic hierarchy process. Management science, 26(7), 641-648.
  70. Wu, Y.Y., & Ma, H.W. (2019). Challenges for Integrating Strategic Environmental Assessment to Enhance Environmental Thinking: A Case Study of Taiwan Energy Policy. Sustainability, 11(3), 609. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11030609
  71. Zhang, X., & Lam, J.S.L. (2019). A fuzzy Delphi-AHP-TOPSIS framework to identify barriers in big data analytics adoption: case of maritime organizations. Maritime Policy & Management, 46(7), 781-801. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2019.1628318