Vol. 13 No. 82 (2024)
Articles

Theoretical and praxeological foundations of investigating crimes against freedom, honor, and dignity in Ukraine during wartime

Vadym Filashkin
Regional Military Administration, Ukraine.
Author Biography

Ph.D. Head of Donetsk Regional State Administration, Regional Military Administration, Ukraine.

Mykola Stoianov
National University «Odesa Law Academy», Ukraine.
Author Biography

Ph. D. Associate Professor of the Department of Criminal Procedure, Detective and Operational Investigation of National University «Odesa Law Academy», Ukraine.

Alina Murzanovska
National University «Odesa Law Academy», Ukraine.
Author Biography

Ph.D. Associate Professor, Department of Criminal Procedure, Detective and Investigative Activities, National University «Odesa Law Academy», Ukraine.

Daria Balobanova
Lviv State University of Internal Affairs, Ukraine.
Author Biography

Doctor of Legal Sciences, Professor, Professor of the Department of Criminal Law and Criminology, Lviv State University of Internal Affairs, Ukraine.

Ruslan Komisarchuk
Donetsk State University of Internal Affairs, Ukraine.
Author Biography

Ph.D. Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of State and Legal Disciplines and Public Administration, Faculty No. 4, Donetsk State University of Internal Affairs, Ukraine.

Published 2024-10-30

Keywords

  • praxeology, criminal law and procedure, criminalistics, criminal offenses against liberty, honor, and dignity of a person, principles of criminal investigation.

How to Cite

Filashkin, V., Stoianov, M., Murzanovska, A., Balobanova, D., & Komisarchuk, R. (2024). Theoretical and praxeological foundations of investigating crimes against freedom, honor, and dignity in Ukraine during wartime. Amazonia Investiga, 13(82), 251–263. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2024.82.10.20

Abstract

During armed conflict, human rights violations such as illegal detentions, torture, and enforced disappearances significantly increase, threatening citizens' rights and freedoms. Investigating these crimes in wartime presents unique challenges, including limited access to evidence and the safety risks for victims and witnesses. Effective pre-trial investigations are crucial for justice, restoring victims' rights, and holding perpetrators accountable, which also strengthens public trust in the criminal justice system.

This article aims to analyze the theoretical and praxeological foundations of investigating crimes against a person’s liberty, honor, and dignity in Ukraine, particularly in wartime. It examines legal norms, procedural aspects, and current challenges in protecting individual rights during conflict, focusing on the difficulties of identifying, investigating, and proving such crimes.

The research uses a comparative analysis of Ukraine’s legal framework with international standards, empirical research to identify practical challenges, and legal policy analysis to propose improvements.

Key findings include the need for specialized investigative practices in wartime, such as remote testimony and alternative evidence collection, and the gap in legal protections during conflict.

Recommendations include adopting tailored investigative approaches, strengthening legal safeguards for victims, and providing specialized training for law enforcement to handle wartime crimes effectively.

By addressing these issues, Ukraine can improve its criminal justice system in wartime, ensuring justice for victims and maintaining public trust in legal processes even amidst conflict.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Alieva, K. (2021). The genesis of the concepts of honor and dignity of the person as objects of criminal law protection. Law. State. Technology, 3, 98-103. Retrieved from https://journals.politehnica.dp.ua/index.php/lst/article/view/39/30
  2. Andrushko, A. V. (2020). Theoretical and practical principles of preventing and countering crimes against the will, honor and dignity of a person. Kyiv: Vaite. Retrieved from https://www.osce.org/files/f/documents/6/0/479372.pdf
  3. Borisov, V. I. (2018). Crimes against the will, honor and dignity of the individual. Crimes against sexual freedom and sexual integrity. Kharkiv: Pravo. Retrieved from https://jurkniga.ua/contents/vibrani-tvori-v-i-borisov.pdf
  4. Eurojust (2018). Prosecuting war crimes of outrage upon personal dignity based on evidence from open sources – Legal framework and recent developments in the Member States of the European Union. Fabruary 2018, 6. Retrieved from https://acortar.link/NdxOyd
  5. European Union. (2018). Prosecuting war crimes of outrage upon personal dignity based on evidence from open sources. Retrieved from https://acortar.link/NdxOyd
  6. Fast, O. (2020). The role of medieval legal doctrine in the formation of ideas about honor and dignity as a legal institution. Entrepreneurship, economy and law, 5, 208–214. Retrieved from http://pgp-journal.kiev.ua/archive/2020/5/38.pdf
  7. Franks, Q. (2018). Criminal justice: Government policies and programs. New York: Nova Science Publishers. Retrieved from https://novapublishers.com/shop/criminal-justice-government-policies-and-programs/
  8. Hryshchuk, V. (2020). Effectiveness of criminal law support of dignity protection and security in Ukraine: questions of social conditionality. Criminal-legal sciences, 12, 395-402. Retrieved from https://cris.mruni.eu/server/api/core/bitstreams/7287a6c9-f3cf-424e-9a46-044c795c86e9/content
  9. Law No. 2341-III. Criminal Code of Ukraine. The Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, 2001. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/card/2341-14
  10. Law No. 254k/96-VR. Constitution of Ukraine. The Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, 1996. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/card/254%D0%BA/96-%D0%B2%D1%80
  11. Law No. 3909-IX. On the ratification of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court and its amendments. The Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, 2024. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/card/3909-20
  12. Law No. 4651-VI. Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine. The Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, 2012. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/4651-17#Text
  13. Pchelina, O.V., & Nevyadovskyi, V.O. (2023). Circumstances to be ascertained during the pre-trial investigation of high-profile criminal offenses against the will, honor and dignity of a person. Analytical and comparative jurisprudence, 3, 376-381. Retrieved from http://journal-app.uzhnu.edu.ua/article/view/284811/278877
  14. Pletenets, V. M. (2020). Theoretical and praxeological principles of overcoming opposition to pre-trial investigation. Odesa: Helvetica Publishing House. Retrieved from https://acortar.link/zl4Hxg
  15. Polishchuk, V.A. (2014). The praxeological approach as an innovative basis for improving the professional training of future social workers. Scientific Bulletin of the Uzhhorod National University. Pedagogy, social work, 32, 148–150. Retrieved from https://dspace.uzhnu.edu.ua/jspui/handle/lib/11357
  16. Resolution No. 1, On judicial practice in cases of protection of the dignity and honor of an individual, as well as the business reputation of an individual and a legal entity. Plenum of the Supreme Court of Ukraine, 2009. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/ v_001700-09#Text
  17. Shulha, A., Tkach, A., Murzo, Y., Horodetska, M., & Sokur, T. (2023). Forensic information sources during the investigation of war crimes. Amazonia Investiga, 12(71), 103-116. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2023.71.11.9
  18. Stashis, V. V., & Tatsiy, V. Ya. (2010). Criminal law of Ukraine. Kharkiv: Pravo. Retrieved from https://library.nlu.edu.ua/POLN_TEXT/KNIGI-2010/UgolovPravoZag.pdf
  19. Supreme Court (2022). Resolution of the Supreme Court of Ukraine on the qualification of a person's actions as human trafficking using the vulnerable state of victims. Informational message. Retrieved from https://supreme.court.gov.ua/supreme/pres-centr/news/1249695/
  20. Tonry, M. (2018). Punishment and Human Dignity: Sentencing Principles for Twenty-First-Century America. University of Minnesota Law School Scholarship Repository, 1, 119-157. Retrieved from https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1855&context=faculty_articles
  21. United Nations. (1949). Geneva Conventions. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/en/genocideprevention/documents/atrocity-crimes/Doc.33_GC-IV-EN.pdf
  22. United Nations. (1998). Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. Retrieved from https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/rome-statute-international-criminal-court
  23. Volkova, N., Prytuliak, V., Yanitska, I., Poliuk, Y., & Polunina, O. (2023). Current issues of the application of ECTHR decisions and its implementation in the field of children’s rights protection. Amazonia Investiga, 12(67), 241–249. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2023.67.07.22
  24. Voznyuk, A. (2021). Criminal offenses against the will, honor and dignity of a person: a fundamental study in criminal law and criminological dimensions. Bulletin of the Penitentiary Association of Ukraine, 4, 182-183. Retrieved from https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.34015/2523-4552.2020.4.17
  25. Ward, T. (2009). Dignity and human rights in correctional practice. European Journal of Probation University of Bucharest, 1(2), 112-127. Retrieved from http://www.antoniocasella.eu/archica/Ward_dignity_2009.pdf
  26. Worldcourts (1947). Schmid, United States General Military Government Court, Dachau, 19 May 1947, 14 LRTWC 62, 140. Retrieved from https://www.worldcourts.com/imt/eng/decisions/1947.05.19_United_States_v_Schmid.htm
  27. Zavidnyak, I.O. (2019). Tactical operations aimed at overcoming opposition to the investigation of criminal offenses committed with the use of modern information technologies. International Legal Bulletin: Current Problems of Modernity (Theory and Practice), 15, 159-166. Retrieved from https://acortar.link/Nq8w27