Vol. 13 No. 76 (2024)
Articles

Enhancing Architectural Space through AI-Driven Ideation: A Case Study of Future Iranian-Traditional City

Shabnam Golkarian
Near East University, Nicosia, Turkey.
Author Biography

Assist. Prof. Dr., Department of Architecture, Near East University, Nicosia, Turkey.

Published 2024-04-30

Keywords

  • Artificial Intelligence, Architectural Space, Iranian-Traditional City, Future Cities, Midjourny, Dall.e3.

How to Cite

Golkarian, S. (2024). Enhancing Architectural Space through AI-Driven Ideation: A Case Study of Future Iranian-Traditional City. Amazonia Investiga, 13(76), 157–172. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2024.76.04.13

Abstract

Artificial intelligence is an evolving technology that has drawn huge economic and social, educational benefits for the future. The revolutionary potential of this technology is boundless, as it can transform how humans live, work, learn, discover, and interact with each other. This research aims to investigate the theoretical foundations of environmental psychology, identify the characteristics of the appropriate architectural space, and then investigate the effect of using artificial intelligence in creating the appropriate architectural space from a formal aspect. The research method is descriptive-analytical and of a qualitative type, which was done by studying library sources and then logically analyzing the data. The research tool is artificial intelligence Midjourny and Dall.e3, which has been introduced for some time in creating artistic images from input words, and prompts. It has been the focus of various artists and architects. It can be said that with architectural conceptual plans, the future will become a reality differently, and they can positively influence the creativity of architects and create futures that most people will not think of today. The use of these images in creating accessible spaces is only one example of the use of artificial intelligence in the architectural design process and it can inspire architectural researchers in various fields.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Adetayo, A.J. (2024). "Reimagining learning through AI art: the promise of DALL-E and MidJourney for education and libraries". Library Hi Tech News. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHTN-01-2024-0005
  2. Alexander, C. (1977). A Pattern Language: Towns, Buildings, Construction (1141 pages). Oxford University Press. https://www.patternlanguage.com/
  3. Allen, A., Kern, M. L., Rozek, C. S., McInereney, D., & Slavich, G. M. (2021). Belonging: A Review of Conceptual Issues, an Integrative Framework, and Directions for Future Research. Australian Journal of Psychology, 73(1), 87. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049530.2021.1883409
  4. Al-Saigh, M.N., & Mahmoud, K.F. (2023). The impact of smart interactive technologies in creating personal internal spaces: An analytical study of user preferences for interactive shape characteristics. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 18(8), 2339-2348. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsdp.180804
  5. Barker, N. (2023). ZHA developing "most" projects using AI-generated images says Patrik Schumacher. Dezeen. Retrieved May 31, 2024, from https://acortar.link/Pb00RS
  6. Barker, R. G. (1989). Roger G. Barker. In G. Lindzey (Ed.), A history of psychology in autobiography (Vol. 8, pp. 2–35). Stanford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1037/11347-001
  7. Brunswick, E. (1943). Organismic achievement and environmental probability. Psychological Review, 50(3), 255-272. https://acortar.link/99ZBZy
  8. Carleton, A. D., Harper, E., Menzies, T., Xie, T., Eldh, S., & Lyu, M. R. (2020). The AI Effect: Working at the Intersection of AI and SE. IEEE Software, 37, 26-35. https://doi.org/10.1109/MS.2020.2987666
  9. Charehjoo, F., Etesam, I. and Rasoulpour, H. (2018). The Role of environmental psychology in Architecture and urban design. Scientific Journal “Academia Architecture and Construction, 1(2), 11-15.
  10. Charles, E., & Sommer, R. (2011). Ecological Psychology. Encyclopedia of Human Behavior (Second Edition), 7-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-375000-6.00142-7
  11. Diba, D., & Dehbashi, M. (2004). Trends in modern Iranian architecture. J Iran Archit Chang Soc, 31-41. https://acortar.link/OEyGf6
  12. Gehl, J. (2011). Life Between Buildings: Using Public Space (6th ed., p. 103pages). Island Press. https://www.amazon.com/Life-Between-Buildings-Using-Public/dp/1597268275
  13. Hanna, D. (2023). The Use of Artificial Intelligence Art Generator “Midjourney” in Artistic and Advertising Creativity. Journal of Design Sciences and Applied Arts, 4(2), 42-58. https://doi.org/10.21608/jdsaa.2023.169144.1231
  14. Hillier, B., & Hanson, J. (1989). The Social Logic of Space (p. 292pages). Cambridge University Press. https://www.amazon.com/Social-Logic-Space-Bill-Hillier-ebook/dp/B00INYG94Q
  15. James, W. (2010). Great Men And Their Environment. (p. 46 pages). Hardcover: Kessinger Publishing. https://acortar.link/yVx3rx
  16. Kaplan, A. M, & Haenlein, M. (2019). Siri, Siri, in my hand: Who’s the fairest in the land? On the interpretations, illustrations, and implications of artificial intelligence. Business horizons, 62(1), 15-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2018.08.004
  17. Lewin, K., Lewin, G. W., & Cartwright, D. (2014). “Psychological Ecology” in The People, Place, and Space Reader. Edited by: Jen Jack Gieseking, 17-21. New York: Routledge.
  18. Lima, G., Zhunis, A., Manovich, L., & Cha, M. (2021). On the Social- Relational Moral Standing of AI: An Empirical Study Using AI-Generated Art. Frontiers in Robotics and AI. Frontiers in Robotics and AI Journal., 8, 719944. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2021.719944
  19. Lynch, K. (1964). The Image of the City (p. 103pages). The MIT Press. https://acortar.link/hkzP5l
  20. Lyu, S. (2023). Midjourney Prompt Basic Structure. Medium. Retrieved February 14, 2024, from https://bluetata.medium.com/midjourney-prompt-basic-structure-29ced65c6fef
  21. Münsterberg, H. (2004). Psychology & Life (p. 304). Kessinger Publishing Co; Revised Edition. https://www.amazon.co.uk/Psychology-Life-Hugo-Munsterberg/dp/1417930624
  22. Ng, C. F., Gifford, R., Veitch, J. A., & McCunn, L. J. (2019). Environmental psychology. In M. E. Norris (Ed.), The Canadian Handbook for Careers in Psychological Science. Kingston, ON: eCampus Ontario. Licensed under CC BY NC 4.0. Retrieved from https://ecampusontario.pressbooks.pub/psychologycareers/chapter/environmental-psychology/
  23. Norman, D. A. (1980). Twelve issues for cognitive science. Cognitive science, 4(1), 1-32. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1207/s15516709cog0401_1
  24. Norman, D. A. (2013). The Design Of Everyday Things (p. 368pages). Basic Books; Revised Edition. https://acortar.link/6UCz4y
  25. Rane, N., Choudhary, S., & Rane, J. (2023). Integrating ChatGPT, Bard, and leading-edge generative artificial intelligence in architectural design and engineering: applications, framework, and challenges. SSRN. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4645595
  26. Sommer, R. (1969). Personal Space: Behavioural Basis of Design. Prentice-Hall. https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=1628276
  27. Tellios, A., Koulali, P., & Valsamidou, K. (2023). Designing Tomorrow: AI and the Future of Architectural Design Process. Polis_press. https://doi.org/10.37199/f40002703
  28. Ulrich, R. (1984). View Through a Window May Influence Recovery from Surgery. Science, 224(4647), 420-421. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.6143402
  29. Wilson, E.O., & Kellert, S. R. (1993). The Biophilia Hypothesis. Island Press, Washington, DC. 484 pages. ISBN: 1-55963-148-1. $27.50. (1995). Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 15(1), 52-53. https://doi.org/10.1177/027046769501500125