Vol. 13 No. 76 (2024)
Articles

Integrating smart city and smart citizen into the digital economy

Marsel M. Imamov
Institute of Management Economicsand Finance of the Kazan Federal University, Russian.
Bio

Published 2024-04-30

Keywords

  • smart city, citizens, interactions, governance, evolution, infrastructure.

How to Cite

Imamov, M. M. (2024). Integrating smart city and smart citizen into the digital economy. Amazonia Investiga, 13(76), 83–89. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2024.76.04.7

Abstract

The study aims to enhance interactions within smart city infrastructures by systematically analyzing associated challenges and proposing strategic solutions. Employing methodologies such as system analysis, synthesis, optimization, modeling, and decision-making—while considering process uncertainties—we dissect the "smart city" and "smart city dweller" concepts, charting their evolutionary cycles. The results outline a structural framework for interactions between citizens, the state, businesses, and society, integrating key subsystems into a unified infrastructure. We also evaluate feedback mechanisms in urban projects like "Active Citizen" and "Garbage. Not.Net," and investigate smart city self-regulation using the Hurwitz criterion. These insights provide actionable guidance for assessing and advancing smart city projects.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Afzalan, N., Sanchez, T., & Evans-Cowley, J. (2017). Creating Smarter Cities: Considerations for Selecting Online Participatory Tools. Cities, 67, 21-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.04.002
  2. Akhremenko, A.S., Stukal, D.K., & Petrov, A.P. (2022). Network or text? Factors in the spread of protest in social media: theory and data analysis. Policy. Political studies, 2, 73-91. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2020.02.06
  3. Basheva, O.A. (2020). Digital activism as a new method of civic mobilization. Sociology and management, 6(1), 41-57. https://doi.org/10.18413/2408-9338-2020-6-1-0-4
  4. Burkhardt, D., Nazemi, K., Zilke, J. R., Kohlhammer, J., & Kuijper, A. (2014). Fundamental Aspects for E-Government. In: P. Sonntagbauer, K. Nazemi, S. Sonntagbauer, G. Prister, D. Burkhardt (Eds.), Handbook of research on Advanced ICT integration for Governance and Policy Modeling. Hershey, PA: IGI Global, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-6236-0.ch001
  5. Couldry, N., Stephansen, H., Fotopoulou, A., MacDonald, R., Clark, W., & Dickens, L. (2014). Digital Citizenship? Narrative Exchange and the Changing Terms of Civic Culture. Citizenship Studies, 18(6-7), 615-629.
  6. Dalton, R. (2015). The Good Citizen: How a Younger Generation Is Reshaping American Politics. CQ Press, 240 p.
  7. Eriashvili, N.D., Ivanova, Yu.A., & Radchenko, T.V. (2021). Global problems of humanity and ways to solve them. Bulletin of the Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, 1, 36-42. https://doi.org/10.24412/2073-0454-2021-1-36-42
  8. Falco, E., & Kleinhans, R. (2018). Digital Participatory Platforms for CoProduction in Urban Development: A Systematic Review. International Journal of E-Planning Research, 7(3), 52-78. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJEPR.2018070105
  9. Hjerpe, M., Glaas, E., & Storbjörk, S. (2018). Scrutinizing Virtual Citizen Involvement in Planning: Ten Applications of an Online Participatory Tool. Politics and Governance, 6(3), 159-169. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v6i3.1481
  10. Ismagilova, E., Hughes, L., Dwivedi, Y., & Raman, K. (2019). Smart cities: Advances in research – An information systems perspective. International journal of information management, 47, 88-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.01.004
  11. Jones, L.M., & Mitchell, K.J. (2016). Defining and Measuring Youth Digital Citizenship. New Media & Society, 18(9), 2063-2079.
  12. Jones, P., Layard, A., Speed, C., & Lorne, C. (2015) MapLocal: Use of Smartphones for Crowdsourced planning. Planning Practice and Research, 30(3), 322-336. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2015.1052940
  13. Kaziev, V.M., Kazieva, B.V., & Kaziev, K.V. (2022). Fundamentals of Legal Informatics and Informatization of Legal Systems (2nd ed.). University textbook. M.: INFRA-M, 336 p. https://znanium.ru/catalog/document?pid=1840487
  14. Kahne, J., & Bowyer, B., (2018). The Political Significance of Social Media Activity and Social Networks. Political Communication, 35(3), 470-493. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2018.1426662
  15. Menteş, S.A. (2019). Online environmental activism: The case of Igneada floodplain forest. SAGE Open. July-September, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019877877
  16. Smoleva, E.O., & Popov, A.V. (2022). Features of digital civic participation in the perspective of modern research. Economic and social changes: facts, trends, forecast, 15(3), 154-166. http://esc.vscc.ac.ru/article/29306/full?_lang=ru
  17. Teocharis, Y. (2015). The conceptualization of digitally networked participation. Social Media Society, 2(1), 5-1. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115610140
  18. Youngs, R. (2019). Civic Activism Unleashed: New Hope or False Dawn for Democracy? N.Y.: Oxford University Press, 192 р.