Vol. 12 No. 70 (2023)
Articles

Self-governance structures in EU Nations: Drawing lessons for Ukraine's bar systems

PDF HTML
  • Krystyna Rezvorovych,
  • Mariia Vovk,
  • Serhii Koretskyi,
  • Maryana Shupyana,
  • Oleksii Alonkin
Krystyna Rezvorovych
Dnipropetrovsk State University of Internal Affairs, Ukraine.
Bio
Mariia Vovk
State University of Internal Affairs, Ukraine
Bio
Serhii Koretskyi
Cooperative Institute of Business and Law, Ukraine.
Bio
Maryana Shupyana
Lviv National University, Ukraine.
Bio
Oleksii Alonkin
State University of Trade and Economics, Ukraine
Bio
DOI: https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2023.70.10.19

Published 2023-10-30

Keywords

  • Western, Europe, legal, supranational, rule-making

How to Cite

Rezvorovych, K., Vovk, M., Koretskyi, S., Shupyana, M., & Alonkin, O. (2023). Self-governance structures in EU Nations: Drawing lessons for Ukraine’s bar systems. Amazonia Investiga, 12(70), 210–219. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2023.70.10.19

Abstract

Objective: The objective of the study is to examine the experience of the organization of lawyers, the self-governance of lawyers, and the professional ethics of lawyers in the EU, to develop, from the analyzed material, practical recommendations aimed at strengthening the status of a lawyer and improve the Bar Association in Ukraine. Methodology: The methodological basis of the study is formed by general philosophical methods, and private legal methods of knowledge of the objective reality in the field of the organization of the bar association and the professional ethics of lawyers in the EU. Findings: The study found that the organization of lawyers and the professional ethics of lawyers in the EU are well developed and meet international standards. EU lawyers have a recognized professional status and play an important role in protecting human rights and justice. Conclusion: The findings of the study provide a solid basis for strengthening the status of lawyers in Ukraine. The Ukrainian government could improve the status of lawyers by adopting legislation that fully recognizes their autonomy and role in society.

PDF HTML

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Alatas, Z., & Santiago, F. (2022). In the client’s defense, the effectiveness of advocacy’s immune rights. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Law, Social Science, Economics, and Education, ICLSSEE 2022, 16 April 2022, Semarang, Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.16-4-2022.2320138
  2. Antone, N., Kizub, D., Gralow, J., Zujewski, J. A., & Dvaladze, A. (2021). Advancing breast cancer advocacy in Eastern Europe and Central Asia: Findings from Women’s empowerment cancer advocacy network (WE CAN) summits. JCO Global Oncology, 7, 585-592. https://doi.org/10.1200/go.20.00532
  3. Avril, L. (2018). Lobbying and advocacy: Brussels’ competition lawyers as brokers in European Public Policies. Czech Sociological Review, 54(6), 859-880. https://doi.org/10.13060/00380288.2018.54.6.433
  4. Bakalinska, O., Honcharenko, O., Kaptsova, T., & Babadzhanian, H. (2022). Advocacy of competition in the World and ukraine: Comparative characteristics. Access to Justice in Eastern Europe, 5(4), 145-158. https://doi.org/10.33327/ajee-18-5.4-n000428
  5. Filipova, M., Iliev, K., & Yuleva-Chuchulayn, R. (2021). A Transhumanist Legal Worldview: Responding to the Challenges of Time (Requirement, or Necessity?). Futurity Economics&Law, 1(1), 28-37. https://doi.org/10.57125/FEL.2021.03.25.5
  6. Gevorgyan, S., & Baghdasaryan, K. (2021). Toward a Transhumanist Transformation of Human Labor Potential in the Context of Global Challenges. Futurity Economics&Law, 1(4), 36-45. https://doi.org/10.57125/FEL.2021.12.25.05
  7. Khalilov, E. M. ogly. (2023). Legal status of subjects of public relations in the procedural law of the future of Azerbaijan. Futurity Economics&Law, 3(1), 43-53. https://doi.org/10.57125/FEL.2023.03.25.05
  8. Kumar, A. (2021). Analysis of the Principle of Subsidiarity as a Principle of EU Law: Future Perspectives. Futurity Economics&Law, 1(4), 18-27. https://doi.org/10.57125/FEL.2021.12.25.03
  9. Law of Ukraine No. 27. On the bar and practice of law. Bulletin of the Verkhovna Rada (BVR), 2013. https://acortar.link/ELnvRd
  10. Legislation (1998) Directive 98/5/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 1998. Core EU Legislation, 197-202. https://acortar.link/Y3aKQa
  11. Melnikoff, D. E., & Strohminger, N. (2020). The automatic influence of advocacy on lawyers and novices. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(12), 1258-1264. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-00943-3
  12. Mozhaikina, O. (2020). International Legal Regulation of Advocacy. Foreign Trade: Economics, Finance, Law, 110(3), 26–34. doi: https://doi.org/10.31617/zt.knute.2020(110)03
  13. Nazarov, I. V., Ovcharenko, O. M., Kovalyova, Y. O., & Remeskova, Y. O. (2020). Independence of an advocate in disciplinary proceedings: Comparative approach with a focus on Ukrainian experience. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, 10(2 (40), 603-615. https://doi.org/10.14505//jarle.v10.2(40).22
  14. Paryzkyi, I. (2021). General Theory of Future Law: Definitions, Innovative Potential. Futurity Economics&Law, 1(3), 25-32. https://doi.org/10.57125/FEL.2021.09.25.03
  15. Pech, L. (2022). The rule of law as a wellestablished and well-defined principle of EU law. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 14(2–3), 107-138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40803-022-00176-8
  16. Rezvorovych, K. R. (2022). Legal nihilism in Ukraine: essence, causes and ways to overcome. In Legal Sciences and Their Role in The Development of The Legal Culture of a Modern Man (pp. 163-179). Publishing house “Baltija Publishing.” https://doi.org/10.30525/978-9934-26-209-8-8
  17. Ukrainian National Bar Association (2012) Rules of Attorneys' Ethics. [File PDF] https://acortar.link/5FDFnu