E-democracy in the context of the information society: prospects, challenges and opportunities

Keywords: netocracy, e-democracy, e-government, information society, digitalization.

Abstract

Many factors mark contemporary political processes. The peculiarities of the political system and regime largely determine them. The type of political process, which is characterized by social and political activity of persons and social groups, is democratic. The establishment of such a regime is characterized by gradual steps to introduce democratic principles into the political system, societal institutions, culture, and lifestyle. Such a peaceful transition to a democratic regime can be called democratization. In contemporary public policy, representatives of governing structures seek ways to develop forms of societal participation in decision-making processes. Meanwhile, interested groups, in turn, strive to enhance the quality and legitimacy of the policies enacted. Electronic democracy tools are not a reincarnation of former means of political communication. In such cases, it concerns democratization and the neoliberal ideology within civil society. In the virtual environment, electronic participation addresses the issue of societal involvement in political processes and the role of innovations as a whole. Political participation can be seen as a tool for democratization and authoritarian control, including influencing the electorate. The study aims to determine the role of e-democracy in contemporary post-industrial society and the degree of its practical technological implementation. The paper describes the content and role of e-democracy in post-industrial society. The authors analyzed the impact of information and communication technologies on the processes of electronic democratization. It has been shown that an active application of information technologies in everyday social life to form electronic democracy has led to both positive societal trends and negative social consequences. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Lina Storozhenko, State University of Information and Communication Technologies, Ukraine

Candidate of Philological Sciences, Associate Professor, Doctoral Student of the Department of Public Management and Administration, Educational and Scientific Institute of Information Protection, State University of Information and Communication Technologies, Kyiv, Ukraine

Oleksandr Ignatenko, State University of Information and Communication Technologies, Ukraine.

Doctor of Sciences in Public Administration, Associate Professor, Professor of the Department of Public Management and Administration, Educational and Scientific Institute of Information Protection, State University of Information and Communication Technologies, Kyiv, Ukraine.

Tetiana Yaroshovets, State University of Information and Communication Technologies, Ukraine.

Candidate of Philosophical Sciences, Associate Professor, Department of Public Management and Administration, Educational and Scientific Institute of Information Protection, State University of Information and Communication Technologies, Kyiv, Ukraine.

Iryna Antypenko, State University of Information and Communication Technologies, Kyiv, Ukraine.

Doctor of Public Administration, Professor of the Department of Public Management and Administration, Educational and Scientific Institute of Information Protection, State University of Information and Communication Technologies, Kyiv, Ukraine.

Vadym Vlasenko, State University of Information and Communication Technologies, Ukraine.

Candidate of Technical Sciences, Associate Professor, Department of Public Management and Administration, Educational and Scientific Institute of Information Protection, State University of Information and Communication Technologies, Kyiv, Ukraine.

References

Bard, Al., & Soderqvist, J. (2002). Netocracy: The New Power Elite and Life After Capitalism. Pearson Education, 288 p. ISBN 13: 978-1903684290

Bell, D. (1976). The Coming of Post-Industrial Society: A Venture in Social Forecasting. Paperback, July 21. Published by Penguin ISBN 13: 9780140551150

Carr, P. R., Hoechsmann, & M., & Thésée, G. (eds.) (2018). Democracy 2.0: Media, political literacy and critical engagement. Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789463512305

Castells, M. (2000). End of Millennium, The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture Vol. III. Malden, MA. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. Wiley-Blackwell; ISBN-13 978-0631221395

Chadwick, A., & May, C. (2003). Interaction between states and citizens in the age of the Internet: "e-government" in the United States, Britain, and the European Union. Governance-an International Journal of Policy and Administration, 16(2), 271-300.

Chase, M. S., & Mulvenon, J. C. (2002). You've Got Dissent! Chinese Dissident Use of the Internet and Beijing's Counter-Strategies. Santa Monica: Rand Corporation. ISBN: 0833031791

Davis, R. (1999). The Web of Politics. The Internet’s Impact on the American Political System. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN-13: 978-0195114850

Grazian, F., & Nahr, H. (2020). Next level participation: Citizen-Driven e-Democracy Tools. Brussels: European Liberal Forum. Available at: https://acortar.link/1gLYZv

Hong, S., & Kim, N. (2018). Will the Internet Promote Democracy? Search Engines, Concentration of Online News Readership, and E-democracy. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 15(4), 388-399.

Huntington, S. P. (1991). The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press. ISBN-13: 9780806125169

Jarren, O., & Donges, P. (2006). Political communication in media society. Wiesbaden: Publishing House for Social Sciences. Publisher: Westdeutscher Verlag ISBN-13: 9783531333731

Johnson, J. A. (2007). The Illiberal Culture of EDemocracy. Journal of E-Government, 3(4), 85-112.

Keohane, R. O., & Nye, J. S. (1998). Power and Interdependence in the Information Age. Foreign Affairs, 77(5), 81-94. https://doi.org/10.2307/20049052

Lieberman, J. L. (2015). Ralph Ellison's Technological Humanism MELUS Vol. 40, No. 4, Technology, the Posthuman, and Aesthetics in Multi-Ethnic Literature. (WINTER 2015), 8-27

Lindner, R., & Aichholzer, G. (2020). EDemocracy: Conceptual Foundations and Recent Trends, in Leonhard Hennen et al. (eds.), European E-Democracy in Practice, Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27184-8_2

Masuda, Y. (1980). The Information Society as Post-industrial Society. Institute for the Information Society. Tokyo, 158 p. ISBN13: 978-0930242152

Moss, G., & Coleman, S. (2014). Deliberative Manoeuvres in the Digital Darkness: eDemocracy Policy in the UK. The British Journal of Politics & International Relations, 16(3), 410-427.

Sclove, R. E. (1995). Democracy and Technology. N. Y.: The Guilford Press. https://acortar.link/22tGox

Thornton, A. L. (2001). Does the Internet create democracy? Ecquid Novi: African Journalism Studies, 22(2), 126-147, https://doi.org/10.1080/02560054.2001.9665885

Toffler's, A. (1984). The Third Wave Mass. Market Paperback, May 1, 560 p

Toffler's, A. (1990). Powersoft, Wealth and Violence at the Edge the 21st Century. New York. Random House Publishing, 2022, 640 p. ISBN-13: 9780593159774

United Nations E-government Survey (2022). The Future of Digital Government 2022. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, UNITED NATIONS, New York, 2022.

Published
2023-10-30
How to Cite
Storozhenko, L., Ignatenko, O., Yaroshovets, T., Antypenko, I., & Vlasenko, V. (2023). E-democracy in the context of the information society: prospects, challenges and opportunities. Amazonia Investiga, 12(70), 63-77. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2023.70.10.6
Section
Articles
Bookmark and Share