Published 2023-02-28
Keywords
- Russian aggression, innovative education, psychological state, psychology of stress, academic performance.
How to Cite
Abstract
The aim of the research is to study social transformations in the field of higher education under the impact of the factor of military invasion. Methods: The method of expert evaluations; Testing and questionnaire survey using the following methods: Life Stressor Checklist–Revised (LSC-R), Organizational Culture Assessment Instrument (OCAI). Analysis of statistics was carried out using t-Student, ?-Fisher tests; multidimensional methods of data analysis (regression, factor, correlation). The results: The study showed that the average indicator for the sample is in the range of high values (M = 518 ± 604). In general, neuro-psychological tension (NT) in the aggregate sample is in the medium range (M=58.4±7.32). The results demonstrate a typologically pronounced level of trust as a psychological phenomenon among students in the wartime (Trust Index: M=98.3±5.27). Conclusions: The results of the study showed a significant impact of the hostilities on the social transformations of the educational sector. This is due to changes in organizational needs and psychological stress. Prospects: Further research should be aimed at studying the driving forces of social transformation in the wartime. It is also necessary to develop a methodological framework for monitoring and evaluating such changes.
Downloads
References
Camarena, K. (2022). Ukraine: Keeping education alive. Independent Education, 52(2), 12-13.
Davydenko, N., & Volkov, A. (2022). The War in Ukraine: The Crisis of Innovative Startup. Economy and society, 38. https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2022-38-55
Eichler, G., & Schwarz, E. (2019). What Sustainable Development Goals Do Social Innovations Address? A Systematic Review and Content Analysis of Social Innovation Literature. Sustainability, 11(2), 522. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11020522
Ekici, M. (2021). A systematic review of the use of gamification in flipped learning. Education and Information Technologies, 26, 3327–3346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10394-y
Enriquez Layos, P. (2022). Higher Education Support EU Education Solidarity Group for Ukraine. Italy: European Training Foundation. https://policycommons.net/artifacts/2481351/higher-education-support-eu-education-solidarity-group-for-ukraine/3503569/
Galego, D., Moulaert, F., Brans, M., & Santinha, G. (2022). Social innovation & governance: a scoping review. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 35(2), 265-290. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2021.1879630
Giuri, P., Munari, F., Scandura, A., & Toschi, L. (2019). The strategic orientation of universities in knowledge transfer activities. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 138, 261-278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.09.030
Gordon, A., Becerra, L. D., & Fressoli, M. (2017). Potentialities and constraints in the relation between social innovation and public policies: some lessons from South America. Ecology and Society, 22(4), 2. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09493-220402
Hwang, G.J., Chang, S.C., Song, Y., & Hsieh, M.C. (2020). Powering up flipped learning: An online learning environment with a concept map-guided problem-posing strategy. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37(2), 429-445. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12499
Jurado, P., Moreno-Guerrero, A.J., Marín-Marín, J.A., & Soler, R. (2020). The term equity in education: A literature review with scientific mapping in web of science. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(10), 3526. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17103526
Kurepin, V. M. (2022). The war in Ukraine: how to support anxious people. Phantom anxiety syndrome. Theses of Reports from the Annual Thematic "Round Table": Global Challenges, Threats of Desertification of Territories, International Obligations of the Countries of the World, 21-22. https://dspace.mnau.edu.ua/jspui/handle/123456789/11217
Lavrysh, Y., Lytovchenko, I., Lukianenko, V., & Golub, T. (2022). Teaching during the wartime: Experience from Ukraine. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2022.2098714
López, M., & Bernal, C. (2019). Teaching in the Network Society: analysis of the digital competences of students in Education at the University of Cádiz. International Journal of Educational Research and Innovation (IJERI), 11, 83-100. https://bit.ly/2LIr8F0
Ma, Y., & Wright, E. (2022). Expanding flexible citizenship: Chinese international school students and global mobilities for higher education. Social Transformations in Chinese Societies, (ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/STICS-05-2022-0010
McLean, A. A. (1979). Work Stress. Boston, MS: Addison-Wesley. https://books.google.com.ua/books/about/Work_Stress.html?id=CNSRAAAAIAAJ&redir_esc=y
Monteiro, S., Isusi-Fagoaga, R., Almeida, L., & García-Aracil, A. (2021). Contribution of Higher Education Institutions to Social Innovation: Practices in Two Southern European Universities. Sustainability, 13(7), 3594. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su13073594
Moreno-Guerrero, A. J., Soler-Costa, R., Marín-Marín, J. A., & López-Belmonte, J. (2021). Flipped learning and good teaching practices in secondary education. Comunicar, 29(68), 107-117. https://doi.org/10.3916/C68-2021-09, https://www.revistacomunicar.com/index.php?contenido=detalles&numero=68&articulo=68-2021-09
Nazarenko, Y., Kogut, I., & Zheriobkina, T. (2022). Education and war in Ukraine (February 24–April 1, 2022). Analytical Center Cedos. https://cedos.org.ua/researches/osvita-i-vijna-v-ukrayini-24-lyutogo-1-kvitnya-2022/
Robertson, S. L., & Nestore, M. (2022). Education cleavages, or market society and the rise of authoritarian populism? Globalisation, Societies and Education, 20(2), 110-123. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2021.1955662
Schröder, A., & Krüger, D. (2019). Social Innovation as a Driver for New Educational Practices: Modernising, Repairing and Transforming the Education System. Sustainability, 11(4), 1070. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su11041070
Schulten, K., Gonchar, M., & Engle, J. (2022). Teaching resources to help students make sense of the war in Ukraine. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2022/03/16/learning/lesson-plans/teaching-resources-to-help-students-make-sense-of-the-war-in-ukraine.html
Shaw, R. B. (1997). Trust in the balance: building successful organizations on results, integrity, and concern. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
Shelever, O. V., Koval, H. V., & Fizer, V. S. (2022). Online education: prospects and problems in the context of military conflicts. Scientific publications of the Department of Psychology, 49(2), 184-188. https://dspace.uzhnu.edu.ua/jspui/handle/lib/44110
Sysoieva, S. O. (2022). The War in Ukraine. Reflections of Polish Scientists. Bulletin of the National Academy of Pedagogical Sciences of Ukraine, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.37472/v.naes.2022.4120
Trubavina, I., Kalina, K., Tsybulko, L., Mohylova, N., & Ivanchuk, V. (2022). The Value and Ways of Providing Continuous Education in the Conditions of the State of Martial. Collection of theses of the 4th International Scientific and Practical Conference "Value Landmarks in The Modern World: Theoretical Analysis and Practical Experience", 340-343. http://dspace.tnpu.edu.ua/bitstream/123456789/25631/1/Czinnisni_orienturu_2022.pdf#page=341
Trubavina, I., Tsybulko, L., Mohyliova, N., & Ivanchuk, V. (2020). The theoretical foundations of the regional training program for teachers’ professional development «Education in conflict». The International Conference on History, Theory and Methodology of Learning. SHS Web of Conferences, 75, 02005. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20207502005
Unceta, A., Guerra, I., & Barandiaran, X. (2021). Integrating Social Innovation into the Curriculum of Higher Education Institutions in Latin America: Insights from the Students4Change Project. Sustainability, 13(10), 5378. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.3390/su13105378
Ziegler, R. (2018). Social innovation and the capability approach. Atlas of Social Innovation, 36-39. https://acortar.link/x2GTum