Linguistic patterns in the lexical-semantic subsystem of new public administration: typology and features
The authors analyzed the confeptosphere of public administration from the position of representation in the Rus-sian language as an area of increased interest from the controlling structures in the field of state security. The au-thors relied on the postulates of the presence of three dimensions inherent in verbal signs: due to the indirect connec-tions of words and objects of semantics, determined by the relationship of words to each other syntagmatics and due to the relationship of words and communicants of pragmatics; about the discreteness and continuity of verbal signs, about the relative simplicity and minimal variability of intersystem relations between them, about the limited motivation of verbal signs and the inverse proportion of morphemic complexity and semantic structure of the word. The focus of attention is on studying the influence of language patterns on the functioning of the “dominant” lexi-cal-semantic subsystem of public administration in the Russian language of the recent period, associated with the ideas about the specifics of public administration focused on ensuring law and order and constitutionally estab-lished rights and freedoms of citizens. The paper concludes that lexical and semantic patterns are important in de-termining the main trends in the development of the lexical system of the Russian language in general, individual subsystems and language signs in particular.
Baranov, V. (2021). Digital management as an integral component of the digital economy. Pryazovskyi Economic Herald, 1(24). https://doi.org/10.32840/2522-4263/2021-1-9
Bekkozhanova, G.H., Askarova, S.A., Mamedova, F.Z., & Ospanova, G.T. (2020). Lexico-Semantic and Functional Peculiaries of business discourse as means of communication. Eurasian Union of Scientists, 76(7-3). URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/lexico-semantic-and-functional-peculiarities-of-business-discourse-as-means-of-communication (date of base: 30.11.2022).
Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (1991). Social construction of reality. A treatise on the sociology of knowledge. Penguin Books, 125.
Bloomfield, L. (1983). An introduction to the study of language. An Introduction to the Study of Language, 1-383. https://pure.mpg.de/rest/items/item_2282964/component/file_2282963/content
Breal, M. (1897). Essay on semantics: science of meanings. Paris: Hachette, 349.
Degtyarova, A.R., & Osadchy, M.A. (2012). Legevfemism as a tactic of avoiding legal risks in online news publications. Bulletin of Kemerovo State University, (4-3), 159-162. [In Russian]
D’haen-Bertier, A. (2015). The importance and use of languages in the EU Institutions, in particular from the perspective of interpretation. Language use in public administration. Contributions to the EFNIL Conference 2015 in Helsinki, 27-33. http://www.efnil.org/conferences/13th-annual-conference-helsinki/proceedings/EFNIL-Helsinki-Book-Final.pdf
Dudareva, M. A., Shvetsova, T. V., Chesnokova, N. E., Shtanko, M. A., & Bronnikov, D. G. (2021). “Distant death” in Maxim Gorky’s short story “Obsession”. Amazonia Investiga, 10(42), 9-14. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2021.42.06.1
Entina, T., Karabulatova, I., Kormishova, A., Ekaterinovskaya, M., & Troyanskaya, M. (2021). Tourism Industry Management in the Global Transformation: Meeting the Needs of Generation Z. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 23(2), 130-148. DOI: 10.17512/pjms.2021.23.2.08
Giannakidou, A., & Zeijlstra, H. (2017). The landscape of negative dependencies: negative concord and n-words. The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Syntax, 1-38.
Greenberg, J., Osgood, C., & Jenkins, J. (1970). Memorandum on language universals. In: New in Linguistics (V) Moscow: Progress, pp. 31-44.
Guillaume, G. (1984). Foundations for a Science of Language. Foundations for a Science of Language, 1-199.
Jespersen, О. (2014). The System of Grammar. Selected Writings, New York: Routledge, pp 245-270.
Jacobs, P., Krupka, G. R., & Rau, L. F. (1991). Lexico-semantic pattern matching as a companion to parsing in the text understanding [Electronic source]: https://aclanthology.org/H91-1066.pdf
Jones, M. N., Willits, J., Dennis, S., & Jones, M. (2015). Models of semantic memory. Oxford handbook of mathematical and computational psychology, 232-254.
Hack, V.G. (1972). The problem of semantic syntagmatics. In: Problems of structural linguistics, pp 367-396. Moscow: Nauka. [In Russian]
Hewson, J. (1995). Guillaumean Linguistics. In Concise History of the Language Sciences (pp. 277-280). Pergamon.
Hromovenko, V. (2020). Thematic groups of political neologisms in English and Ukrainian: a comparative approach. Science and Education a New Dimension. Philology, VIII (66), (218), 31-34.
Karabulatova, I., Vildanov, Kh., Zinchenko, A., Vasilishina, E., & Vassilenko, A. (2017). Problems of transformation matrices modern multicultural identity of the person in the variability of the discourse of identity Electronic Information Society. Pertanika Journal of Social Science & Humanities, 25(S), p.1-16.
Karabulatova, I.S., Aipova, A.K., Butt, S.M., & Amiridou, S. (2021). Linguocognitive conflict of digital and pre-digital thinking in online educational discourse during the pandemic: social danger or a new challenge? J. Sib. Fed. Univ. Humanit. soc. sci., 14(10), 1517–1537. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17516/1997-1370-0836
Karabulatova, I.S., Shabambayeva, A. G., Nikitin, M. Yu., Rezuanova, G. K., & Syzdykova, G. K. (2022). Bukharian Jews and Tobolsk Bukharians in the south of Western Siberia and the Kazakh Steppe in the XVII-XIX centuries: adaptive practices of avoiding conflicts in the merchant environment// Questions of History, 10(2), pp. 52-65, DOI: 10.31166/VoprosyIstorii202210Statyi48
Kartsevsky, S. O. (1965). On the asymmetric dualism of the linguistic sign. The History of linguistics of the XIX–XX centuries in essays and extracts. M., 1965. 3rd ed. Part 2. pp. 85-93. http://project.phil.spbu.ru/lib/data/ru/karcevskiy/dualizm.html
Kattsina, T., & Karabulatova, I. (2020). Social Control of offences by minors: perception and interpretation in early Soviet Russia (1917-1921). Terra Sebus, 12, 243-262.
Kristinsson, A. P. (2015). Language in public administration in present-day Iceland: some challenges for majority language management. Language use in public administration. Contributions to the EFNIL Conference 2015 in Helsinki: 83-93. http://www.efnil.org/conferences/13th-annual-conference-helsinki/proceedings/EFNIL-Helsinki-Book-Final.pdf
Lin, Y., Karabulatova, I.S., Shirobokov, A.N., Bakhus, A.O., & Lobanova, E.N. (2021). Cognitive distortions in the reflection of civic identity in China: on the material of Russian-language media of East and Western. Amazonia Investiga, 10(44), 115-125. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2021.44.08.11
McKeever, W.F., Hoemann, H.W., Florian, V.A., & VanDeventer, A.D. (1976). Evidence of minimal cerebral asymmetries for the processing of English words and American Sign Language in the congenitally deaf. Neuropsychologia, 14(4), 413-423.
Madina, M. (2022). Lexical and Semantic Features of Professional Names in Uzbek Language. International Journal of Development and Public Policy, 1(8), 15–18. Retrieved from https://openaccessjournals.eu/index.php/ijdpp/article/view/897
Mamedov, A.K., & Kokina, P.O. (2019). Chapter 2. Stigmatization as a phenomenon: sociological optics. Human well-being in a variety of scientific approaches. Monograph. Volume II. Under the general editorship of N.A. Gafner. Western: Androvita LLC (Western), 2019: 24- 40. [In Russian]
Markl, N., & McNulty, S. J. (2022). Language technology practitioners as language managers: arbitrating data bias and predictive bias in ASR. Cornell University.
Mirzaeva, A. S. (2022). Intra-Linguistic and Extra-Linguistic Factors related to the language and vocabulary of the basic concepts of Renaissance English philolsophy. Eurasian Journal of Social Sciences, Philosophy and Culture, 1(5), 9-17.
Obolonskii, A. V. (1986). State Administration and Public Expectations. Soviet Law and Government, 24(4), 3-17.
Okolyshev, D.A. (2018). Organization of the public control system in the Russian Federation (based on the materials of the Public Chamber of the Moscow Region). Municipal Academy, 4, pp. 76-81. [In Russian]
Peggy Heikkinen (2015). Language use in public administration – theory and practice in the European states. Language use in public administration. Contributions to the EFNIL Conference 2015 in Helsinki: 25-27 http://www.efnil.org/conferences/13th-annual-conference-helsinki/proceedings/EFNIL-Helsinki-Book-Final.pdf
Pina, V., Torres, L., & Yetano, A. (2009). Accrual accounting in EU local governments: One method, several approaches. european accounting Review, 18(4), 765-807.
Pllana, G., & Pllana, S. (2019). The impact of different extra-linguistic and intralinguistic factors of contemporary Albanian technical terminology. Russian Linguistic Bulletin, 3(19), 61-64.
Podger, A., De Percy, M., & Vincent, S. (2021): Politics, policy and public administration in theory and practice: Essays in honour of Professor John Wanna. ANU Press, Acton, https://doi.org/10.22459/PPPATP.2021
Popelo, O., Garafonova, O., Tulchynska, S., Derhaliuk, M., & Berezovskyi, D. (2021). Functions of public management of the regional development in the conditions of digital transformation of economy. Amazonia Investiga, 10(43), 49-58. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2021.43.07.5
Popova, O.V. (2021). Lexico-semantic field of the concept "power" (based on the material of "Domostroy" and "The legend of princess Olga"). SHS Web of Conferences 101, 01003 https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202110101003
Rakhilina, E., & Reznikova, T. (2016). A frame-based methodology for lexical typology. The lexical typology of semantic shifts, 58, 95-129.
Read, A. W. (1948). An account of the word semantics. Word, pp. 78—97.
Reisig К. (1839). Professor K. Reisig's Lectures on Latin Linguistics edited with notes by Friedrich Haase. Lehnhold.
Sajous, F., Navarro, E., Gaume, B., Prévot, L., & Chudy, Y. (2013). Semi-automatic enrichment of crowdsourced synonymy networks: the WISIGOTH system applied to Wiktionary. Language Resources and Evaluation, 47(1), 63-96.
Seifter, M. (2018). Further from the people: The puzzle of state administration. NYUL Rev., 93, 107.
Sofiyanur, M. (2022). Necessity of Euphemisms in Various Spheres and Ways of Creating Them. American Journal of Social and Humanitarian Research, 3(6), 94-98.
Stern G. (1931). Meaning and change of meaning; with special reference to the English language. Wettergren & Kerbers.
Torayeva, U. S. (2021). The issue of synonymy in uzbek legal terms. Scientific progress, 2(8), 52-56.
Ullmann, S. (1970). Semantic Universals. New York: Universals of Language, pp. 172-207.
Velinov, E., Maly, M., Petrenko, Ye., Denisov, I., Vassilev, V. (2020). The Role of Top Management Team Digitalization and Firm Internationalization for Sustainable Business, 12(22). Sustainability. Doi: 10.3390/su12229502, 12, 22, (9502).
Vergara-Romero, A., & Sorhegui-Ortega, R. (2020). Factores de desarrollo local desde el enfoque de la gestión organizativa. Amazonia investiga, 9(33), 46-50. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2020.33.09.5
Zagorovskaya, O.V. (2015). Typological varieties of the Russian language and its existence at the beginning of the XXI century. Journal of Voronezh State Pedagogical University, 3(268), 96-101. [In Russian]
Zavarzina, G.A. (2012). Public administration: current vocabulary of the Russian language at the beginning of the XXI century. Voronezh: Voronezh State Pedagogical University. [In Russian]
Zavarzina, G.A., Dankova, T.N., Demidkina, E.A., & Grigorenko, O. V. (2020). Innovations of the new public administration language: professionally prestigious sociolectisms or the signs of communicative failures? Amazonia Investiga, 9(28), 338-345. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2020.28.04.38
Ziemba, P. (2020). Multi-criteria stochastic selection of electric vehicles for the sustainable development of local government and state administration units in Poland. Energies, 13(23), 6299.