Published 2022-08-30
Keywords
- compensation for damage, judicial practice, military actions, military conflict, international court.
How to Cite
Abstract
The military actions of the Russian Federation against Ukraine cause considerable losses to the Ukrainian people: the military and civilian population die, infrastructure and housing are destroyed, and cultural heritage is destroyed. The specified losses must have consequences namely - compensation for damages at the expense of the occupying country. So, it is vital to analyze the realities of international judicial practice regarding the specifics of compensation for damage by the aggressor state and to understand the prospects of obtaining such compensation for Ukrainians. The purpose of the work is to study the trends of international judicial practice regarding the specifics of compensation for damage resulting from military actions. The research methodology is hermeneutic, historical, extrapolation, comparative legal, generalization, analysis, synthesis, and deduction. Attention was drawn to the fact that a state that grossly violates international humanitarian law and human rights can act as a defendant in national courts. In addition, the analysis of the legislation on compensation for damages, including those caused as a result of Russia's military aggression, determines the development and adoption of legal acts that will regulate the issue of social protection and the specifics of compensation for damages to the population affected by the armed conflict.
Downloads
References
Atamanova, Yu., & Kobets, I. (2022). Recovery of damages from the Russian Federation: prospects for the execution of court decisions. LCF website. Recovered from https://lcf.ua/thought-leadership/international-arbitration/styagnennya-zbitkiv-z-rf-perspektivi-vikonannya-sudovih-rishen/
Attorney General v. Adolf Eichmann (Case no. 40/61): judgment of the Supreme Court of Israel of 11.12.1961. Recovered from https://www.britannica.com/biography/Adolf-Eichmann
Bushchenko, A.P., & Hnatovskyi, M.M. (2017). Baseline research on the application of transitional justice in Ukraine. Kyiv: USAID. Recovered from https://helsinki.org.ua/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Summary-final-dlya-sajtu.pdf
Case No. 308/9708/19: judgment of the Supreme Court of 04.14.2022. Recovered from http://search.ligazakon.ua/l_doc2.nsf/link1/VS220020.html
Case of Al-Adsani v. United Kingdom (Application no. 35763/97): judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 21.11.2001. Recovered from http://eurocourt.in.ua/Article.asp?AIdx=443
Civilm Plus. (2019). Justice and fairness in post-conflict societies? European experience and perspectives. Recovered from https://civilmplus.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/23.03-DRA-brochure-AT-UKR-web.pdf
Council of Europe. (2018). Guide on the application of Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Recovered from https://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Guide_Art_8_UKR.pdf
Germany v. Italy: Greece intervening (Case no. 2012/2): Case of Jurisdictional Immunities of the State, judgment of the International Court of Justice of the United Nations of 03.02.2012. Recovered from https://www.icj-cij.org/en/case/143
Judgment - In Re Pinochet (Session 1998-99): judgment of the House of Lords of Great Britain of 15.01.1999. Recovered from https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld199899/ldjudgmt/jd990115/pino01.htm
Judicial and Legal Gazette. (2022). Zelensky signed the Decree on the composition of the group that will develop a mechanism for compensating Ukraine for damage from the Russian Federation: list of participants.
Kharytonov, O. (2022) Russia will pay: the new legal position of the Supreme Court regarding the responsibility of the aggressor state. LB.ua website. Recovered from https://lb.ua/blog/alexei_kharitonov/515566_rosiya_zaplatit_nova_pravova.html
Kononenko, V.P. (2018). Settlement of territorial disputes by the UN International Court of Justice. Kyiv: Phoenix.
Law No. 254k/96-BP, Constitution of Ukraine. The Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, from June 28, 1996. Recovered from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/254%D0%BA/96-%D0%B2%D1%80#Text
McElhinney v. Ireland (Application no. 31253/96): judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 21.11.2001. Recovered from http://eurocourt.in.ua/Article.asp?AIdx=443
Parkhomenko, P. (2022). State immunity is leaky. Law and Business website. Recovered from https://zib.com.ua/ua/151329.html
Plyskan, I. (2022). Damage to company property as a result of military actions: should we expect compensation and how to confirm losses? Liga zakon website. Recovered from https://biz.ligazakon.net/analitycs/210240_poshkodzhennya-mayna-pdprimstva-vnasldok-vonnikh-dy-chi-varto-rozrakhovuvati-na-vdshkoduvannya-ta-yak-pdtverditi-vtrati
Skrypnyk, O., & Musienko, O. (2022) Damage compensation as an important part of the policy of deoccupation of Crimea. The website of the Center for Defense Strategies. Recovered from https://defence.org.ua/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/CDS_Vidshkoduvannia_zbytkiv_ukr.pdf
Sydorovych, R. (2022). Russia will pay the Ukrainians for the war. Mission impossible? Ukrainian Pravda website. Recovered from https://www.epravda.com.ua/columns/2022/06/9/687970/
United Nations, & International Court of Justice. (1945). STATUTE OF THE INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE, The Charter dated June 26, 1945. Recovered from https://www.icj-cij.org/en/statute
United Nations. (1950). Convention on the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. Recovered from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_004#Text
United Nations. (1993). Statute of the International Tribunal of Yugoslavia. Recovered from https://www.icty.org/x/file/Legal%20Library/Statute/statute_sept09_en.pdf
United Nations. (2004). Convention on Jurisdictional Immunities. Recovered from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/card/995_e50
.gif){kind=small}
