Vol. 11 No. 53 (2022)
Articles

The impact of the war with Russia on the export/import of Ukraine and possible tools to restore the Ukrainian economy

PDF HTML
  • Ievgeniia Lytvynova,
  • Anzhela Ignatyuk,
  • Mariya Knir,
  • Olena Liubkina
Ievgeniia Lytvynova
Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Ukraine.
Bio
Anzhela Ignatyuk
Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Ukraine.
Bio
Mariya Knir
Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Ukraine. 
Bio
Olena Liubkina
Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Ukraine.
Bio
DOI: https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2022.53.05.2

Published 2022-07-04

Keywords

  • export, import, Ukrainian economy, sustainable development, foreign economic activity.

How to Cite

Lytvynova, I., Ignatyuk, A., Knir, M., & Liubkina, O. (2022). The impact of the war with Russia on the export/import of Ukraine and possible tools to restore the Ukrainian economy. Amazonia Investiga, 11(53), 16–25. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2022.53.05.2

Abstract

The war posed a new challenge to the Ukrainian economy: how to ensure the recovery of Ukrainian exports / imports and enable businesses to recover after the war. The aim of this study was to identify possible tools of the customs tariff mechanism that will help Ukrainian companies to recover and start working. This study is comparative and compares the structures of customs and tariff regulation of the EU and Ukraine, both in pre-war Ukraine and during the war. A poll conducted in 2022 shows the attitude of Ukrainian business to reforms and the introduction of new instruments of the customs tariff mechanism. The survey was conducted among 76 companies engaged in exports and import, of which 29 have an import component in their goods. The survey examined the business response to the introduction of the proposed innovations in Ukraine. The research methodology is based on qualitative and quantitative research methods. This study proposes ways to improve the customs tariff mechanism in Ukraine, namely the presentation of the latest models to improve the existing customs tariff mechanism, which were developed in early 2022, and are effective for the recovery of the Ukrainian economy after the war. This study also includes an analysis of the impact of the proposed models on the achievement of sustainable development goals in Ukraine in the future.

PDF HTML

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abreo, C., Bustillo, R., & Rodriguez, C. (2022). An empirical analysis of Colombia's trade liberalization process and its effect on the equilibrium of its structural trade deficit. Review of Development Economics, 26, 736– 755. https://doi.org/10.1111/rode.12860

Aituar, A. (2021). Trade Sanctions and Customs Union Partners of the Target Country: Evidence from Kazakhstan. Peace Economics, Peace Science and Public Policy, 27(4), 549-566. https://doi.org/10.1515/peps-2020-0044

Alonso, V. (2021). El comercio internacional de armamento y las ventajas comparativas, Revista de Estudios en Seguridad Internacional, 7(2), 83-104. http://dx.doi.org/10.18847/1.14.5

Brown, L.K., & Troutt, E. (2018). A re-analysis of the trade and welfare effects of export subsidies. Applied Economics Letters, 25(6), 420-424. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2017.1329925

Chen, W., & Wang, N. (2022). Visualizing the changing geographies of international trade, 2000-19. Regional studies regional science, 9(1), 132-134. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681376.2022.2043770

Crozet, M., Demir, B. & Javorcik, B. (2022). International Trade and Letters of Credit: A Double-Edged Sword in Times of Crises. IMF Econ Rev. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41308-021-00155-3

Davis, C.L., & Pelc, K.J. (2017). Cooperation in Hard Times: Self-restraint of Trade Protection. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 61(2), 398-429. Doi: 10.1177/0022002715595699

Dluhosch, B., & Horgos, D. (2013). Trading up the happiness ladder. Social Indicators Research, 113, 973–990. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-012-0122-9

Dos Reis, M., Da Silva Porto, S., & De Azevedo, A.F. (2021). The impacts of the World Trade Organization on new members. World economy, 44(7), 1944-1972. https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.13109

Galovic, T. (2021). International competitiveness of asean regional integration. Ekonomski vjesnik/Econviews - Review of Contemporary Business, Entrepreneurship and Economic Issues, 34(1), https://doi.org/10.51680/ev.34.1.2

Herman, P. R. (2022). A pragmatic approach to estimating nondiscriminatory non-tariff trade costs. Rev Int Econ, 1– 30. https://doi.org/10.1111/roie.12604

Medin, H. (2021). Why do firms import via merchants in entrepot countries rather than directly from the source? Review of international economics. https://doi.org/10.1111/roie.12583

Miševi?, P. (2021). International trade of the eurasian economic union (EAEU). Ekonomski vjesnik/Econviews - Review of Contemporary Business, Entrepreneurship and Economic Issues, 34(1), https://doi.org/10.51680/ev.34.1.14

Olha, Y., Stašys, R., Tsygankova, T., Reznikova, N., & Uskova, D. (2021). Protectionism sources of trade disputes within international economic relations. Management Theory and Studies for Rural Business and Infrastructure Development, 42(4), 516–526. https://doi.org/10.15544/mts.2020.53

Rahul, M., & Gilles, C. (2021). Abnormal pricing in international commodity trade: Empirical evidence from Switzerland, Resources Policy, 74, 102352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102352

Sidorov, V. N., & Sidorova, E. V. (2021). La facilitación del comercio en tres dimensiones: «suave», «dura» y digital. Revista De La Facultad De Derecho, (51), e2021n51a8. https://doi.org/10.22187/rfd2021n51a8

Vural, G. (2013) Comparison of Asymmetric Trade Costs: Estimated vs. Recovered. Procedia Economics and Finance, 5, 779-788. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(13)00090-7

Watson, A. (2021). Trade credit, trade income elasticity and the international transmission of shocks. Eurasian Econ Rev, 11, 687–733. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40822-021-00178-1

Yan, D., & Chunding, L. (2021) China and the Reform of International Trade Governance System. Social Sciences in China, 42(3), 140-164. DOI: 10.1080/02529203.2021.1971407

Zelicovich, J. (2022) Are there still shared values to sustain multilateralism? Discourse in World Trade Organization reform debates, Third World Quarterly, 43(2), 332-351, https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2021.2008796