The archaic law. Mononorms and archaic relations of the primitive communal society

Oleh Hanba; Roman Liashuk; Tetiana Ivashkova; Andrii Balendr; Oleksandr Olytskyi

doi:10.34069/AI/2022.52.04.4

Oleh Hanba Bohdan Khmelnytskyi National Academy of the State Border Guard Service of Ukraine, Khmelnytskyi, Ukraine. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8391-8284
Roman Liashuk Bohdan Khmelnytskyi National Academy of the State Border Guard Service of Ukraine, Khmelnytskyi, Ukraine. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0137-0989
Tetiana Ivashkova Bohdan Khmelnytskyi National Academy of the State Border Guard Service of Ukraine, Khmelnytskyi, Ukraine. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9067-3190
Andrii Balendr Bohdan Khmelnytskyi National Academy of the State Border Guard Service of Ukraine, Khmelnytskyi, Ukraine. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4610-2830
Oleksandr Olytskyi Bohdan Khmelnytskyi National Academy of the State Border Guard Service of Ukraine, Khmelnytskyi, Ukraine. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3502-1234

DOI: https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2022.52.04.4

Keywords: archaic law, mononorms, archaic relations, primitive communal system, tribal society.

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to study the archaic law and its mononorms in the context of connection with the archaic relations of primitive society as a means of their implementation, as well as analysis of the dynamics of development of archaic relations, and their peculiarities. During the research were used the following scientific methods: historical, formal-logical, special-legal, comparative-legal, structural-functional analysis. The work is determined to study the problems of the existence of archaic (pre-state) law on conditions of the primitive communal society as the first known type of socio-normative regulation in the history of mankind. The reasons for its occurrence, the peculiarities of formation and provision are argued. The differences of archaic (customary) law from positive juridical law, which is inherent to state-organized society have been analyzed. The place and role of mononorms in archaic law, its characteristic features, peculiarities, varieties and methods of providing have been revealed. The structural elements of the mononorms have been highlighted, the syncretic nature of their application has been substantiated. Complex forms of the expression of the mononorms, that ensure their existence and regulatory function in the primitive society have been characterized. The archaic relations have been analyzed in close connection with the generated mononorms.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Oleh Hanba, Bohdan Khmelnytskyi National Academy of the State Border Guard Service of Ukraine, Khmelnytskyi, Ukraine.

Doctor of Sciences in Law, Head of the Department of Theory of Law and Criminal Procedure Activity, Law Enforcement Faculty, Bohdan Khmelnytskyi National Academy of the State Border Guard Service of Ukraine, Khmelnytskyi, Ukraine.

Roman Liashuk, Bohdan Khmelnytskyi National Academy of the State Border Guard Service of Ukraine, Khmelnytskyi, Ukraine.

Doctor of Sciences in Law, Associate Professor, Professor of the Department of Theory of Law and Criminal Procedure Activity, Law Enforcement Faculty, Bohdan Khmelnytskyi National Academy of the State Border Guard Service of Ukraine, Khmelnytskyi, Ukraine.

Tetiana Ivashkova, Bohdan Khmelnytskyi National Academy of the State Border Guard Service of Ukraine, Khmelnytskyi, Ukraine.

PhD in Pedagogy, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Theory of Law and Criminal Procedure Activity, Law Enforcement Faculty, Bohdan Khmelnytskyi National Academy of the State Border Guard Service of Ukraine, Khmelnytskyi, Ukraine.

Andrii Balendr, Bohdan Khmelnytskyi National Academy of the State Border Guard Service of Ukraine, Khmelnytskyi, Ukraine.

Doctor of Sciences in Pedagogy, Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Foreign Languages, Bohdan Khmelnytskyi National Academy of the State Border Guard Service of Ukraine, Khmelnytskyi, Ukraine.

Oleksandr Olytskyi, Bohdan Khmelnytskyi National Academy of the State Border Guard Service of Ukraine, Khmelnytskyi, Ukraine.

Post graduate student, Bohdan Khmelnytskyi National Academy of the State Border Guard Service of Ukraine, Khmelnytskyi, Ukraine.

References

Alekseev, V. P., & Pershits, A. I. (1990). The history of primitive society, Moscow: Higher. School, 351 p.

Anners, E. (1994). The History of European Law, translation from Swedish. Moscow: Science, 397 p.

Arzhanov, M. A., Kechekian, S. F., Mankovsky, B. S., & Strogovich, M. S. (1949). Theory of State and Law. Moscow: Gos. publishing legal literature, 511 p.

Bayburin, A. K. (1991). Ritual in the System of Symbolic Means of Culture. Ethnological Functions of Culture. Moscow: Science, p. 23–42. Retrieved from: https://eusp.org/sites/default/files/archive/et_dep/Baiburin/Bayburin.pdf

Danilov, V. Yu. (2014). The History of Primitive Society. Vladimir State University named after Alexander Grigorievich and Nikolai Stoletovs, Vladimir, VSU Publishing House, 80 p. Retrieved from: https://cutt.ly/rD2KtvL

Danylyan, O. G., Dzoban, O. P., & Maksimov, S. I. (2009). Philosophy of Law. Kharkiv: Law, 208 p. Retrieved from: https://library.nlu.edu.ua/POLN_TEXT/KNIGI_2009_2/FilosofUchebn2009.pdf

Dumanov, Kh., & Pershits, A. (2000). Mononormatics and elementary law. Article Two, State and law, No. 9, p. 85–91. Retrieved from: http://lawlibrary.ru/article1084400.html

Gurvitch, G. (1931). The present time and the idea of social law. [Le temps présent et l'idée du droit social]. Paris: J. Vrin, 333 р.

Hartland, E. S. (1970). Primitive Law. Port Washington, NY: Kennikat Press, 222 p.

Khvorostyan, M. V. (2010). Common Criminal Law of Aboriginal Australia. The Legal State, No. 12, p. 388–393. Retrieved from: https://docplayer.com/64129093-Obychnoe-ugolovnoe-pravo-aborigenov-avstralii.html

Kislyuk, K. V., & Kucher, O. M. (2005). Religious Studies, Kyiv: Kondor, 636 p. Retrieved from: https://library.nlu.edu.ua/POLN_TEXT/KNIGI/KONDOR1/CD/RELIGIEZNAVSTVO.pdf

Kovler, A. I. (2002). Anthropology of Law. Moscow: NORMA (“NORMA – INFRA M” Publishing Group), 480 p. Retrieved from: https://lib.sale/antropologiya-yuridicheskaya/antropologiya-prava-uchebnik-dlya-vuzov.html

Kozyubra, M. I. (2016). General Theory of Law. Kyiv: Vaite, 392 p.

Legal Encyclopedia (2003). [Recurso electrónico] Kyiv: Ukr. Encycl., vol. 5, 736 p. Retrieved from: http://kul.kiev.ua/praci-2003-roku/juridichna-enciklopedija-v-6-t.-redkol.-ju.s.-shemshuchenko-vidp.-red.-ta-in.html

Lysyuk, I. I. (2011). Some Questions of the Emergence of Social Norms, Journal of the Kyiv University of Law, No. 3, p. 65–69.

Matuzova, N. I., & Malko, A. V. (1997). Theory of State and Law. Moscow: Yurist, 672 p. Retrieved from: https://pravo-olymp.ru/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/TGP_Matuzov_Malko.pdf

Nersesyants, V. S. (1999). Problems of the general theory of law and the state. Moscow: NORMA – INFRA Publishing Group, 832 p.

Olya, B. (1976). The Gods of Tropical Africa, translation from French. Nauka publishing house, 286 p.

Parkhomenko, N. M. (2008). The System of Sources of Law in the Roman-Germanic Legal Family. Comparative Jurisprudence (Legal Systems of the World). Kyiv: Parliamentary publishing house, p. 20–50. Retrieved from: https://library.nlu.edu.ua/POLN_TEXT/UP/PARXOMENKO_2008.PDF

Pento, R., & Gravits, M. (1972). Methods of Social Sciences. Moscow: Progress, 607 p. Retrieved from: https://ru.ua1lib.org/book/3088857/cb4bae

Perschits, A. I., (1979). Problems of normative ethnography. Studies in general ethnography. Moscow: Science, p. 210–240.

Radcliffe-Brown, A. R. (1945). Religion and Society, The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland, 75(1/2), p. 33–43.

Rulan, N. (2000). Legal Anthropology, translation from French, Editor – Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Moscow: NORMA, 310 p.

Shershenevich, G. F. (1995). The General Theory of Law: in 2 volumes. Moscow: Publishing House “Law College of Moscow State University”, 2(2), 363 p. Retrieved from: https://naukaprava.ru/catalog/435/939/2081/17934

Skakun, O. F. (2001). Theory of Law and State. 4th view. Kyiv: Konsum, 656 p. Retrieved from: https://dut.edu.ua/uploads/l_948_39072050.pdf

Spenser, B., & Gillen, F. (1899). The native tribes of central Australia. London: Macmillan and Company, 671 p.

Trubetskoy, E. N. (1998). Encyclopedia of Law. St. Petersburg: Law Institute, 183 p.

Ukrainian Soviet Encyclopedic Dictionary (1987). [Recurso electrónico] Kyiv, vol. 2, Publ. House Caligraphy–Portuguese, 736 p. Retrieved from: http://www.history.org.ua/?termin=Ukrainska_radyanska_yentsiklopediya

Zaichuk, O., & Onishchenko, N. (2006). Theory of state and law. Kyiv: Yurinkom Inter, 688 p. Retrieved from: https://www.ebk.net.ua/Book/law/zaychuk_tdp/zmist.htm

Zwick, M. V., Petryshyn, O. V., & Avramenko, L.V. (2011). The General Theory of State and Law. Kharkiv: Law, 584 p. Retrieved from: https://library.nlu.edu.ua/POLN_TEXT/KNIGI_2009/TEorijaDerjav_2009.pdf