Rhetoric of direct and indirect notation of concepts: the procedure of transformation of an idea into an effect

Keywords: concept, inaugural speech, direct reference, indirect reference, axiological unit, rhetoric.

Abstract

The paper dwells on the textual ways direct and indirect references to concepts transform into particular effects. The topicality of the publication is brought about by the necessity to study the impact on the audience achieved by verbal formation of particular impressions. The goal of the article is to reveal how the direct reference to the democracy concept or its absence creates the desired effect in the inaugurals by American Presidents Obama and Biden. The paper applies the rhetorical methodology of idea-turned-impression to explain the way the concept named in the beginning of a speech transforms into a particular effect meant to influence the audience. It is found that the indirect reference to the democracy concept is implemented by the units of two groups: basic-level, indicating the people and the government, and axiological, naming freedom, equality, unity etc. The direct reference by the noun ‘democracy’ performs compositional and persuasive – existential and metaphorical – functions. The methodology of the article includes methods of analysis and synthesis, as well as special methods of knowledge, which are typical for philology.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Vira Lykina, Kyiv National Linguistic University, Kyiv, Ukraine.

PhD Candidate, Kyiv National Linguistic University, Kyiv, Ukraine.

Serhiy Potapenko, Kyiv National Linguistic University, Kyiv, Ukraine.

Doctor of Philology, Professor, Professor of the Department of English Philology, Translation and Language Philosophy named after Professor O.M. Morokhovsky, Kyiv National Linguistic University, Kyiv, Ukraine.

References

Biden, J. (2021). Inaugural address. The White House. Recovered from https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/speeches-remarks/2021/01/20/inaugural-address-by-president-joseph-r-biden-jr/

Biria, R. & Mohammadi, A. (2012). The sociopragmatic function of inaugural speech: A critical discourse analysis approach. Journal of Pragmatics, 44(10), 1290-1302. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.05.013

Bouchet, N. (2010). Barack Obama’s Democracy Promotion after One Year. E-International Relations. Recovered from https://www.e-ir.info/2010/02/25/barack-obama%e2%80%99s-democracy-promotion-after-one-year/

Burke, M. (2016). Discourse implicature, Quintilian and the Lucidity Principle: Rhetorical phenomena in pragmatics. Topics in Linguistics, 17(1), 1-16. Recovered from https://www.sciendo.com/article/10.1515/topling-2016-0001

Campbell, K.K. & Jamieson, K.H. (1986). Inaugurating the presidency. Form, Genre, and the Study of Political Discourse, 203-225. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.

Cap, P. & Okulska, U. (2013). Analyzing genres in political communication: An introduction. Analyzing genres in political communication, 1-28. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Recovered from https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.50.01cap

Cambridge Dictionary. (2022). Democracy. Recovered from https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/democracy

Concepts and Contrasts. (2017). Odessa: Helvetika Publishing House. [In Ukranian]

Gruber, H. (2013). Genres in political discourse: The case of the ‘inaugural speech’ of Austrian chancellors. Analyzing genres in political communication, pp. 29-72. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Merriam-Webster Dictionary. (2022). Democracy. Recovered from https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/democracy.

Obama, B. (2009). Inaugural address. The White House. Recovered from https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/blog/2009/01/21/president-Barack-obamas-inaugural-address

Obama, B. (2013). Inaugural address. The White House. Recovered from https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2013/01/21/inaugural-address-president-barack-obama

Potapenko, S. (2016). Cognitive rhetoric of effect: energy flow as a means of persuasion in inaugurals. Topics in Linguistics, 17(2), 12-25. Recovered from https://sciendo.com/pdf/10.1515/topling-2016-0010

Potapenko, S. & Izotova, N. (2021). Cognitive rhetoric of effect: Responsibility impression in Russian and Ukrainian presidents' inaugurals. Lege artis. Language yesterday, today, tomorrow. The Journal of University of SS Cyril and Methodius in Trnava, VI(2), 165-201. Recovered from https://lartis.sk/category/issues/

Rattner, N. (2021). Biden’s inaugural address used the word ‘democracy’ more than any other president’s. CNBC. Recovered from https://www.cnbc.com/2021/01/20/bidens-inaugural-address-used-the-word-democracy-more-than-any-other-presidents.html

Rosch, E. (2009). Categorization. Cognition and Pragmatics, 41-52. Amsterdam, Phil.: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Recovered from https://benjamins.com/catalog/hoph.3

Talmy, L. (2000). Force dynamics in language and cognition. Concept Structuring Systems, 1, 409-470. Recovered from https://www.acsu.buffalo.edu/~talmy/talmyweb/Volume1/chap7.pdf
Published
2022-03-10
How to Cite
Lykina, V., & Potapenko, S. (2022). Rhetoric of direct and indirect notation of concepts: the procedure of transformation of an idea into an effect. Amazonia Investiga, 11(50), 152-160. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2022.50.02.15
Section
Articles
Bookmark and Share