Criminal liability for obstructing the legal activity of a defense counsel in court proceedings
Abstract
A fair trial is guaranteed by the efficient work of a lawyer aimed at protecting the client accused of committing an offense and the state protection of advocacy. The purpose of the study was to determine the criminal law protection aimed at ensuring the safeguarding the defense counsel’s activity in court proceedings considered in the context of international standards. Empirical and theoretical methods of research, as well as the method of comparative analysis were used for a comprehensive consideration of the subject. The grounds for criminal liability for obstructing the legal activity of the defense counsel in court proceedings are elaborated. Criminal liability for a crime against justice may take the form of a fine, corrective labor, imprisonment or suspension from office. The protection of the lawyers’ rights and international guarantees of safe advocacy involves the adoption of measures at the state level that will enable lawyers to perform their professional duties without intimidation, pressure, obstruction and interference, as well as measures to eliminate the administrative, economic or other sanctions. Further research will address the advocacy security to determine and substantiate the effective means of its criminal protection.
Downloads
References
Bingulac, N., & Miljenović, D. (2021). Lawyer confidentiality. Law - Theory and Practice [Pravo - Teorija I Praksa], 38(3), 42-52. https://doi.org/10.5937/ptp2103042B
Borodinova, T., Petrikina, A., Borodinov, V., & Gubko, I. (2020). Topical issues of interpretation of the criminal procedure norms on the basis of judicial practice taking into account the international and Russian components. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 3(9), 46-58. https://doi.org/10.36941/ajis-2020-0041
Brady, C., & Peck, J. (2021). Examining the type of legal representation and its influence on disaggregated dispositions in juvenile court. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 4(19), 359-383. https://doi.org/10.1177/15412040211027649
Chow, D., & Calvard, T. (2021). Constrained morality in the professional work of corporate lawyers. Journal of Business Ethics, 2(170), 213-228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04634-x
Consolidated federal law: Entire legal provision for the Criminal Code, version dated November 27, 2021. (2022, February 11) Retrieved from https://www.ris.bka.gv.at/GeltendeFassung.wxe?Abfrage=Bundesnormen&Gesetzesnummer=10002296
Council of the European communities. (1977). Council Directive 77/249/EEC of 22 March 1977 to facilitate the effective exercise by lawyers of freedom to provide services. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:31977L0249&from=PL
Criminal Law of the Republic of Latvia on 17.06.1998. Text consolidated by Valsts valodas centrs (State Language Centre) with amending laws (2021, November 11.). Retrieved from https://likumi.lv/ta/en/en/id/88966-the-criminal-lawThe
Cuomo, S. (2020). CCBE Annual Report 2020. Brussels: CCBE. Retrieved from https://www.ccbe.eu/fileadmin/speciality_distribution/public/documents/Publications/EN_2020_annual-report.pdf
Dehaghani, R. (2021). Interrogating vulnerability: reframing the vulnerable suspect in police custody. Social and Legal Studies, 2(30), 251-271. https://doi.org/10.1177/0964663920921921
European economic and social committee. (2006). Council of Bars and Law Societies of Europe (CCBE). Retrieved from https://www.eesc.europa.eu/en/policies/policy-areas/enterprise/database-self-and-co-regulation-initiatives/72
European Parliament. (1998). Directive 98/5/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 1998 to facilitate practice of the profession of lawyer on a permanent basis in a Member State other than that in which the qualification was obtained. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:31998L0005&from=EN
Fuchs, T. (2013). Criminal Code for the German Reich of May 15, 1871. Historical-synoptic edition 1871-2013. Mannheim: Lexetius. Retrieved from https://lexetius.com/StGB/Titelei
Kokkalera, S. (2021). Representing juvenile lifers: do attorneys in parole hearings matter? Journal of Crime and Justice (Ahead of print). https://doi.org/10.1080/0735648X.2021.1918210
Konarska-Wrzosek, V. (Ed.) (2020). Penal Code Comment [Kodeks karny Komentarz]. Wolters. Retrieved from https://static.profinfo.pl/file/core_products/2020/9/25/682408e70c0df44e58e8de1ff08e476f/KK_Komentarz%20-%20profinfo.pdf?view
Law 10/1995, of the Penal Code. State Official Newsletter Consolidated Legislation (1995, November 23). Retrieved from https://www.boe.es/buscar/pdf/1995/BOE-A-1995-25444-consolidado.pdf
Legifrance. (1992). The penal code of the French Republic. Retrieved from https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/codes/id/LEGITEXT000006070719/
Legislationline. (2005). Criminal code of Denmark. Retrieved from https://www.legislationline.org/download/id/6372/file/Denmark_Criminal_Code_am2005_en.pdf
Legislationline. (2012). Criminal Code of the Kingdom of Netherlands (1881, amended 2012). Retrieved from https://www.legislationline.org/download/id/6415/file/Netherlands_CC_am2012_en.pdf
Legislationline. (2017). Criminal Code of the Republic of Bulgaria (1968, amended 2017). Retrieved from https://www.legislationline.org/download/id/8395/file/Bulgaria_Criminal_Code_1968_am2017_ENG.pdf
Legislationline. (2021). Criminal Code of the Kingdom of Belgium (1867, as amended 2021). Retrieved from https://www.legislationline.org/download/id/8241/file/Belgium_CPC_1808_am2019_fr.pdf
Lovdata. (2005). Lov om straff (straffeloven) (Penal Code). Retrieved from https://lovdata.no/dokument/NL/lov/2005-05-20-28
Martínez Santos, A. (2020). The european court of human rights’ case-law regarding restrictions on the right to prompt legal assistance during police custody. Revista Espanola de Derecho Constitucional, 118, 109-137. https://doi.org/10.1177/10.18042/cepc/redc.118.04
Mergaerts, L. (2021). Defence lawyers’ views on and identification of suspect vulnerability in criminal proceedings. International Journal of the Legal Profession (Ahead of print). https://doi.org/10.1080/09695958.2021.1982719
Murray, J. (2020). Prejudice-based rights in criminal procedure. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 2(168), 277–329.
Novokmet, A. (2019). The Europeanization of the criminal proceedings in the republic of Croatia through the implementation of the directive 2013/48/EU. European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice, 2(27), 97-125. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718174-02702002
Office of the high commissioner for human rights. (1990). Basic principles on the role of lawyers. Retrieved from https://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/roleoflawyers.aspx
Pivaty A., & Soo, A. (2019). Article 7 of the Directive 2012/13/EU on the right to information in criminal proceedings: A missed opportunity to ensure equality of arms in pre-trial proceedings? European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice, 2(27), 126-154. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718174-02702003
Riigi Teataja. (2001). Penal code (abbr. KarS). Retrieved from https://www.riigiteataja.ee/akt/184411
Sherman, J. F. (2021). The corporate general counsel who respects human rights. Legal Ethics, 1(24), 49-72. https://doi.org/10.1080/1460728x.2021.1979731
Thornton, J. (2020). Is publicly funded criminal defence sustainable? Legal aid cuts, morale, retention and recruitment in the English criminal law professions. Legal Studies, 40(2), 230-251. https://doi.org/10.1017/lst.2019.31