Published 2021-10-29
Keywords
- constitutional human rights, digitization, privacy, databases.
How to Cite
Abstract
Consideration of existing and development of new strategies for human rights in the context of globalization is a very significant topic, as careless management of technological change can pose a serious threat to human dignity, autonomy, privacy, and human existence in general. Purpose: to analyze the level of constitutional human rights in the context of digitalization, to consider the positive and negative impact of technological advances on private life, to explore ways to protect fundamental human rights in the context of globalization. The following methods of scientific cognition are used: comparison, historical, systematic approach to research, method of analysis, and synthesis. As a result of the conducted research, the scientific idea of the importance of observance of constitutional human rights in the conditions of digitalization is formed. In addition, the study examines the positive and negative impact of technological advances on private life, explore ways to protect fundamental human rights in the context of globalization and identifies mechanisms for using digitization in public administration, analyzes the legal regulation of informatization is interpreted and effective ways of solving the existing problems of ensuring rights and guarantees are proposed.
Downloads
References
Arbeláez-Campillo, D., Tatsiy, V., Rojas-Bahamón, M., & Danilyan, O. (2020). Contributions of critical thinking as a form of participation and political deliberation. Amazonia Investiga, 9(27), 5-12. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2020.27.03.1
Bochkov, A.A. (2019). The modern state in the context of digital reality. Right. Economy. Psychology, 3, 3–9. Recovered from https://rep.vsu.by/handle/123456789/17978
Committee of Ministers. (2005). Declaration CM (2005)56, Declaration of the Committee of Ministers on human rights and the rule of law in the Information Society. Council of Europe. Recovered from https://www.coe.int/t/dgap/goodgovernance/Activities/Public_participation_internet_governance/Declaration-Information-Society/011_DeclarationFinal%20text_en.asp
Egorov, I. Yu., & Griga, V. Yu. (2019). A Porous Analysis of the Evidence of Indicators of Digitalization in Ukraine and the Other Territories of the EU Shared Partnership. Statistics of Ukraine, 3, 56-62. Recovered from http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/su_2019_3_8
European Court of Human Rights. (2012). Internet: Case-law of the European Court of Human Rights. Recovered from https://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Research_report_Internet_RUS.pdf
Golovko, O.M., & Dubenets, A.S. (2020). The role of digitalization of public services in legal relations with a foreign element. Information and law, 2(33), 170-176. Recovered from http://ippi.org.ua/sites/default/files/18_8.pdf
Gracheva, S.A., & Cheremisinova, M.E. (2018). Issues of constitutional provision of digital rights. MGPU Bulletin, 4(32), 56–70. DOI 10.25688/2076-9113.2018.32.4.06 Recovered from https://vestnik.mgpu.ru/pdf/1565.pdf
Human Rights Council. (2018). 38th session. Agenda item 3. Promotion and protection of all human rights, civil, political, economic, social and cultural rights, including the right to development. Recovered from https://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/HRC/RegularSessions/Session38/Pages/38RegularSession.aspx
Judgment No. C?131/12, Google Spain v Agencia Española de Protección de Datos (AEPD). Court of Justice of the European Union, Luxembourg, 13 May 2014. Recovered from https://curia.europa.eu/jcms/upload/docs/application/pdf/2014-05/cp140070en.pdf
Kolesnikov, B. (2012). Status and prospects of information society development in Ukraine. Public administration and local self-government, 3(14), 37-45. Recovered from http://www.dridu.dp.ua/vidavnictvo/2012/2012_03(14)/12kbpisu.pdf
Law No. 2071, The Constitution of Georgia. August 24, 1995. Recovered from https://matsne.gov.ge/ru/docu-ment/view/30346?publication=35
Lopushynskyi, I.P. (2018). "Digitalization" as the Basis of Public Administration on the Path of Transforming and Reforming of the Ukrainian Society. Theory and practice of public administration and local self-government, 2, 1-18. Recovered from http://el-zbirn-du.at.ua/2018_2/20.pdf
Lutsky, R.P. (2013). Modern approaches to understanding the essence of positive law from the point of view of leading legal scholars. Rule of law, 16, 48-52. Recovered from http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Prav_2013_16_8
Melnyk, M. (2018). State policy in the field of information society development in France: prospects for Ukraine. Edition, 4 (11), 48-57. Recovered from http://www.dridu.dp.ua/vidavnictvo/2011/2011_04(11)/11mmvfpu.pdf
Petrenko, N.O., & Mashkovskaya, N.V. (2020). Development of the state and law: questions of theory and constitutional practice, 2, 112-119. Recovered from http://pravoisuspilstvo.org.ua/archive/2020/2_2020/part_1/20.pdf
Ryabokon, O. (2018). State information policy of information society formation: foreign experience. Center for Research of Social Communications NBUV Recovered from http://nbuviap.gov.ua/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=3244:derzhavna-informatsijna-politika-formuvannya-informatsijnogo-suspilstva-zarubizhnij-dosvid&catid=81&Itemid=415
Shakhrai, S.M. (2020). "Digital" Constitution. The fate of fundamental rights and freedoms of the individual in a total information society. Recovered from https://audit.msu.ru/vshga_news/8448/
The EDRi papers. (2021). The Charter of Digital Rights. Recovered from https://edri.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/EDRi_DigitalRightsCharter_web.pdf
Ukrinform. (2021). Dosvid Estonii can help Ukraine more succumb to the path of digitalization. Recovered from https://www.ukrinform.ua/rubric-technology/3248455-te-so-jde-na-oboronu-cifrovizacia-v-estonii-zaosadzue-2-vvp-premerka.html
.gif){kind=small}
