Published 2021-10-29
Keywords
- drama, dramatic action, personage, personage’s fictional consciousness, a play.
How to Cite
Abstract
The objective of the article is to outline the correlations between the usage of the elements of the absurdist aesthetics, different artistic paradoxes and methods of modelling the fictional consciousness of personage. The aim of research is to define internal and external dimensions of personage’s fictional consciousness construction with the help of the cognitive literary studies methodology. The methodology of cognitive literary criticism is the basis for the analysis of modelling principles, applied in the research of personage’s fictional consciousness in I. Kostetskyi’s play “The Twins Will Meet Again”. Thus, the study of the play is based on actualization of cognitive phenomena and establishing their correlations with forms of artistic reflection. The cognitive method is used to determine the theoretical foundations of the functioning of the character’s fictional consciousness in the dramatic work. The poetics of the absurd in a drama defines agglutinative forms of reflection of the personages’ fictional consciousness.
Downloads
References
Barabash, Yu. (2018). Enfant terrible, or “Alien” among the majority (Igor Kostetskyi. On the way to the Ukrainian pattern of modernism). Word and Time, 9, 18–32. Available at http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/166544
Batsevich, F. (2017). Techniques of surprising depiction of a dramatic work (based on the play by Igor Kostetsky “The Twins Will Meet Again”). Studia Ucrainica Varsoviensia, 5, 15–26. Available at http://cejsh.icm.edu.pl/cejsh/element/bwmeta1.element.ceon.element-28d72b24-0208-3c57-8f00-b8eb45380a1c
Bila, A. (2006). Ukrainian literary avant-garde: searches, stylistic directions: monograph. Kyiv: Smoloskyp.
Cave, T. (2016). Thinking with Literature. Towards a Cognitive Criticism. New York: Oxford University Press.
Cohn, D. (1978). Transparent Mind. Narrative Modes for Presenting Consciousness in Fiction. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Fludernik, M. (2005). Towards a ‘Natural’ Narratology. London; New York: Taylor & Francis e-Library.
Herman, L., & Vervaeck, B. (2001). Handbook of Narrative Analysis. Linkoln; London: University of Nebraska Press.
Hunn, P., & Sommer, R. (2014). Narration in Poetry and Drama. Peter Hunn, Jan Christoph Meister, John Pier, Wolf Schmid (Eds.). Handbook of Narratology, 2nd edition. Berlin; Boston: Walter de Gruyter, 1, 419–434.
Kostetskyi, I. (1963). Theater in front of your doorstep. Munich: On the Mountain. Available at http://irbis-nbuv.gov.ua/ulib/item/0001755
Kovaliv, Yu. (2010). Experimental surprising depiction of I. Kostetskyi. Literary Studies, 29, 191–201. Available at http://www.library.univ.kiev.ua/ukr/host/viking/db/ftp/univ/ls/ls_2017_51.pdf
Lotman, Yu. (2001). Text in the text. Maria Zubrytska (Ed.). Anthology of world literary criticism of the XX century. 2nd edition (p. 581–595). Lviv: Litopys.
Lysenko, N. V., & Kovaliov, R. D. (2016). “The art to love” in the works of modernist writers of AUM. Young Scientist. Philological sciences, 10 (37), 178–181. Available at http://molodyvcheny.in.ua/files/journal/2016/10/41.pdf
Lyubenko, O. (2005). Experiment in Ukrainian drama: the phenomenon of Igor Kostetskyi. Word and Time, 6, 32–41. Available at http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/171747
Matvienko, S. (2001). Experiment with language. Interpretation of the works of Igor Kostetskyi. Courier of Kryvbas, 145, 167–183. Available at http://lab.chass.utoronto.ca/rescentre/slavic/ukr/1412/Matvienko-Ekperyment.pdf
Nunning, A., & Sommer, R. (2008). Diegetic and Mimetic Narrativity: Some Further Steps towards a Transgeneric Narratology of Drama. John Pier, Jose Angel Garcia Landa (Eds). Theorizing Narrativity. Berlin; New York: Walter de Gruyter.
Palmer, A. (2004). Fictional Minds. Lincoln and London: University of Nebraska Press.
Pavi, P. (2006). Dictionary of Theater. Lviv: Ivan Franko National University. Available at https://shron1.chtyvo.org.ua/Pavis_Patrice/Slovnyk_teatru.pdf
Richardson, B. (2007). Drama and Narrative. Herman D. (Ed.). The Cambridge Companion to Narrative. New York; Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Available at https://www.worldcat.org/title/cambridge-companion-to-narrative/oclc/76794778
Sommer, R. (2010). Drama and Narrative. David Herman, Manfred Jan & Marie-Laure Ryan (Eds). Routledge Encyclopedia of Narrative Theory. London; New York: Taylor & Francis e-Library, 119–124. Available at https://salahlibrary.files.wordpress.com/2018/03/routledge-encyclopedia-of-narrative-theory.pdf
Stekh, M. R. (2005). Search. Kostetsky I. The whole world belongs to you. Selected works (p. 7–19). Kyiv: Krytyka. Available at https://shron1.chtyvo.org.ua/Kostetskyi_Ihor/Tobi_nalezhyt_tsilyi_svit_zbirka.pdf?
Tarnashinska, L. (2008). Presumption of expediency. The outline of the modern literary conceptology. Kyiv: Publishing House “Kyiv-Mohyla Academy”. ISBN 978-966-518-463-8
Turner, M. (1996). The Literary Mind: The Origin of Thought and Language. New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0195-12667-X
Virchenko, T., & Kozlov, R. (2021). Ukrainian Intellectual Drama of the 2000s. Amazonia Investiga, 10 (38), 39–50, https://amazoniainvestiga.info/index.php/amazonia/article/view/1541
Zaleska Onyshkevych, L. (1997). Dramaturgy of the Ukrainian Diaspora. The twins will meet again. Anthology of drama of the Ukrainian diaspora (p. 9–32). Kyiv–Lviv: Chas Publishing House. ISBN 966-7007-04-9