Leo Tolstoy's moralizing in context of ethical and aesthetic synthesis

Keywords: moralism, art, didactics, ethical and aesthetic synthesis, Christian values.

Abstract

The article examines the moralizing of Leo Tolstoy on the example of his theoretical ideas.  The authors, examining their genesis, come to the conclusion that the writer formed his ideas under the influence of French enlighteners and sentimentalists, on the one hand, and absorbed the ethical dominant of Russian culture, on the other hand.  The article analyzes the idea of absolutizing good, which runs through Tolstoy's entire aesthetic theory as a leitmotif.  As a result of the study of the aesthetic views of the writer, it is concluded that Tolstoy understood the role of art solely as a translation of feelings and a means of communication.  The writer deprives art of its aura of mystery and does not recognize the latter as a source of aesthetic pleasure and spiritual enrichment.  The article analyzes the worldview of the writer, reveals the influence on him of the experience acquired by Tolstoy in childhood and adolescence.  Tolstoy's works of art and theoretical views are another example of the fact that the artist's worldview does not always coincide with his work.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Svetlana A. Simonova, Moscow State University of Psychology & Education (MSUPE). Moscow, Russia.

Doctor of Philosophical Science, Professor, Moscow State University of Psychology & Education (MSUPE). Moscow, Russia.

Tatiana V. Shvetsova, Federal University named after M.V. Lomonosov (NarFU). Arkchangelsk, Russia.

Candidate of Philology, docent, Federal University named after M.V. Lomonosov (NarFU). Arkchangelsk, Russia.

Marina A. Shtanko, Taganrog Institute of Management and Economics, Taganrog, Russia.

Taganrog Institute of Management and Economics, Taganrog, Russia.

Denis G. Bronnikov, The Kosygin State University of Russia. Moscow, Russia.

The Kosygin State University of Russia. Moscow, Russia.

Alexei A. Mikhailov, Ivanovo State University, Ivanovo, Russia.

Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, Professor, Director of Shuya Branch of Ivanovo State University, Ivanovo, Russia.

References

Annenkov, P.V. (1982) On thought in works of fine literature. Russian aesthetics and criticism of the 40-50s XIX century. M: Publishing house Art.

Astafiev, P.E. (1996) Nationality and universal human tasks (to Russian folk psychology). Problems of Philosophy. M. № 12, pp. 84-102.

Bibikhin, V.V. (1998) New Renaissance. - M.: Nauka, Progress-Tradition. 496 p.

Boyko, M.N. (1997) Self-Consciousness of Art - Self-Consciousness of Man: Essays on Russian Aesthetic Thought of the Second Half of the 19th Century. - M.: Nauka, 187 p.

Clement, O. (2004) Reflections of Light: An Orthodox Theology of Beauty. M.: Biblical-Theological Institute of St. Apostle Andrew, 100 p.

Dudareva, M. (2019). Apophatic elements in the poetry of S. A. Yesenin: Thanats’ characters. Amazonia Investiga, 8 (22), pp. 51-57 https://amazoniainvestiga.info/index.php/amazonia/article/view/27

Dudareva, M., Omuraliev, N. A, Shvetsova, T. V., & Aripova, D. A. (2021). Apophatics of artistic culture: raising the issue. Disease, death and sleep ethoses in Alexander Grin’s story “Struggle with Death”. Amazonia Investiga, 10 (39), pp. 232-237. https://amazoniainvestiga.info/index.php/amazonia/article/view/1590

Fedotov, G.P. (1998). In Defense of Ethics. Fedotov G.P. Sobr. Op. in 12 volumes. M.: Martis. - T.2.

Fetisov, V.P. (1995). Longing for Russian aristocracy Voronezh, Publishing house Kvadrat. 112 p.

Frank, S.L. (1990). Ethics of nihilism Frank S.L. Op. - M.: True.

Frolovsky, G. (1983). The paths of Russian theology. Paris. YMCA-Press.

Nekrasova, E.N. (1997) The Metaphysics of Human Being in Russian Religious Philosophy of the Twentieth Century. M: Martis Publishing House, 160 p.

Niebuhr, H. R. (1996) Christ and Culture. M: Lawyer Publishing House.

Paramonov, B.M. (1999). End of Style. M.: Agraf, 575 p.

Semenova, S.G. (2004) Metaphysics of Russian Literature. M.: PoRog. - T 1. - 510 p.

Shpet, G.G. (2007). Art as a Kind of Knowledge: Selected Works on the Philosophy of Culture. M.: ROSSPEN.

Simonova, S.A. (2008) Architectonics of Culture: Problems of Ethical and Aesthetic Synthesis. Voronezh: Voronezh State University Publishing House, 218 p.

Soina, O.S. (1995) The Phenomenon of Russian Moralizing: Ethical Essays. Novosibirsk: Science, 200 p.

Soloviev, V.S. (1988) The general meaning of art. M., Mysl Publishing House, in 2 volumes, Vol. 2, 892 p.

Tarasov, A.B. (2001). What is Truth? The Righteous of Leo Tolstoy. M.: Languages of Slavic culture, 172 p.

Tolstoy, L.N. (1985) What is art? M: Sovremennik Publishing House. 592 s.
Published
2021-08-29
How to Cite
Simonova, S. A., Shvetsova, T. V., Shtanko, M. A., Bronnikov, D. G., & Mikhailov, A. A. (2021). Leo Tolstoy’s moralizing in context of ethical and aesthetic synthesis. Amazonia Investiga, 10(43), 257-263. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2021.43.07.25
Section
Articles