Aspects of digitalization of the management system in the course of implementation of housing investment and housing projects

Keywords: Unified information platform, housing investment project, engineering, construction, digitalization.

Abstract

This article aims to show how the implementation of the Unified Information Platform (UIP) significantly reduces the construction time during the organization of housing and investment construction. In the article, the author also considers important aspects of the digitalization of construction production. The methodological design involves the method of sociological analysis, the method of expert assessments with subsequent statistical analysis of the data obtained as a result of the questionnaire, the method of mathematical modeling, and comparison. The results of the study made it possible to show that the Unified Information Platform raises the efficiency of relationships between participants in urban planning activities; reduces the total construction period of the facility by 12% (153 days); significantly decreases the cost of construction; the functionality of the Unified Information Platform allows to create a streamlined work process and establish timely control over the performance of work; the absence of such systems or only their local variants noticeably lose in efficiency; the introduction of the Unified Information Platform makes it possible, through electronic interaction, to control the vested interests of corporations and not allow the techno-structure represented by government officials to be subordinated; the use of information technology guarantees maximum efficiency and productivity while minimizing production costs.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Arkadij Larionov, Moscow State University of Civil Engineering, Russia.

Prof., DSc, National Research University - Moscow State University of Civil Engineering, Russia.

References

Agstner, P., & Mascheroni, D.M. (2020). Breach of the mandatory bid rule: minority shareholders' protection in the public vs. private enforcement debate. European Company and Financial Law Review, 17(6), 726–759.

Aguilera, R.V. (2005). Corporate governance and director accountability: An institutional comparative perspective. British Journal of Management, 16(SI), S39–S53.

Ajan, R.S. (ed.) (2003). Sustaining Competitiveness in The New Global Economy: The Experience of Singapore. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Pub.

Altman, M. (1999). The methodology of economics and the survival principle revisited and revised: Some welfare and public policy implications of modeling the economic agent. Review of Social Economy, 57(4), 427–449.

Altman, M. (2017). Policy consequences of multiple equilibria and the indeterminacy of economic outcomes in a boundedly rational world: Closing the system with non-economic variables. Forum for Social Economics, 46(3), 234–251.

Ansoff, H.I. (1977). State of practice in planning systems. Sloan Management Review, 18(2), 1–24.

Ansoff, H.I. (1980). Strategic issue management. Strategic Management Journal, 1(2), 131–148.

Ansoff, H.I. (1985). Conceptual underpinnings of systematic strategic management. European Journal of Operational Research, 19(1), 2–19.

Ansoff, H.I. (1987). The emerging paradigm of strategic behavior. Strategic Management Journal, 8(6), 501–515.

Ansoff, H.I. (1995). Corporate Strategy: An Analytical Approach to Business Policy for Growth and Expansion. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Ansoff, H.I. (2007). Strategic Management. Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

Bernhagen, P. (2007). The Political Power of Business: Structure and Information in Public Policymaking (Series: Routledge Research in Comparative Politics, vol. 21). London; New York: Routledge.

Bond, A.J., & MacLeod, I.A. (2001). A strategy for computer modeling in geotechnical design. Proceedings of the ICE – Geotechnical Engineering, 149(2), 95–102.

Cao, X., Wang, M., & Liu, X. (2019). Application of Big Data visualization in urban planning. IOP Conference Series-Earth and Environmental Science, 440(1), 042066.

Choi, Jiyong, Leite, F., & de Oliveira, D.P. (2018). BIM-based benchmarking system for healthcare projects: Feasibility study and functional requirements. Automation in Construction, 96, 262–279.

Ciscel, D.H. (1984). Galbraith's planning system as a substitute for market. Journal of Economic Issues, 18(2), 411–418.

Ciscel, D.H. (2001). The economics of urban sprawl: Inefficiency as a core feature of metropolitan growth. Journal of Economic Issues, 2(35), 405-413.

Ciscel, D.H., & Smith, B.E. (2005). The impact of supply chain management on labor standards: The transition to incessant work. Journal of Economic Issues, 39(2), 429–437.

Claassen, R.J.G. (2021). Hobbes meets the modern business corporation. Polity, 53(1), 101–131.

Dickinson, H.D. (1971). Economics of Socialism. New York: Books for Libraries Press.

Galbraith, J. (1988). Economics and The Public Purpose. New York: New American Library.

Galbraith, J. (1997). The Age of Uncertainty. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

Gary, M.S., Yang, M.M., Yetton, P.W., & Sterman, J.D. (2017). Stretch goals and the distribution of organizational performance. Organization Science, 28(3), 395–410.

Gray, С.F., & Larson, E.W. (2008). Project management: The Managerial Process (McGraw-Hill/Irwin Series Operations and Decision Sciences). Boston: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

Hernandez, E., & Menon, A. (2021). Corporate strategy and network change. Academy of Management Review, 46(1), 80–107.

Huovinen, P. (2019). Advancing networking-based business management in construction markets. In 10th Nordic Conference on Construction Economics and Organizatio (Emerald Reach Proceedings Series, Vol. 2). Lill, I. & Witt, E. (eds.), (pp: 41-47). Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing.

Lambin, J-J., Chumpitaz, R., & Schuiling, I. (2007). Market-driven Management: Strategic and Operational Marketing. New York: Palgrave MacMillan, Basingstoke.

Lerner, A.P. (1970). The Economics of Control: Principles of Welfare Economics. New York, NY: Kelley.

Lieberman, M., & Hall, R. (2000). Introduction to Economics. Cincinnati: South Western College Pub.

Lo, F.Y, & Liao, P.Ch. (2021). Rethinking financial performance and corporate sustainability: Perspectives on resources and strategies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 162, 120346.

Maletic, J.I., Marcus, A., & Collard, M.L. (2002). A task oriented view of software visualization. In Proceedings of 1st International Workshop on Visualizing Software for Understanding and Analysis (VISSOFT 2002), Paris, France, (pp: 32–40). Paris: IEEE Computer Soc.

McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 117–127.

Olbina, S., & Elliott, J.W. (2019). Contributing project characteristics and realized benefits of successful BIM implementation: A comparison of complex and simple buildings. Buildings, 9(8), 175.

Olugboyega, O., Edwards, D.J., Windapo, A.O., Omopariola, E.D., & Martek, I. (2020). Development of a conceptual model for evaluating the success of BIM-based construction projects. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, DOI: 10.1108/SASBE-02-2020-0013

Ottaviano, E., Pelliccio, A., Gattulli, V. (eds.) (2018). Mechatronics for Cultural Heritage and Civil Engineering. Cham: Springer.

Petrov, A., & Larionov, A. (2020). Organizational and economic aspects of managing St Petersburg’s (Russia) strategic plan dynamic model. Espasios, 41(10), 21.

Pigou, A. (1999). Employment and Equilibrium. Basingstoke: Macmillan.


Reinhardt, F.L., & Stavins, R.N. (2010). Corporate social responsibility, business strategy, and the environment. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 26(2), 164–181.

Reinhardt, F.L., Stavins, R.N., & Vietor, R.H. (2008). Corporate social responsibility through an economic lens. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 2(2), 219–239.

Santos, R., Costa, A.A., & Grilo, A. (2017). Bibliometric analysis and review of Building Information Modelling literature published between 2005 and 2015. Automation in Construction, 80, 118–136.

Schumpeter, J. (2019). American institutions and economic progress. Scienza & Politica - Per una storia delle dottrine, 31(61), 171–183‏.

Schumpeter, J., Becker, M. C., & Knudsen, T. (2002). The fundamental phenomenon of economic development. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 61(2), 405–437.

Schumpeter, J.A. (2013). Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. London: Routledge.

Shneiderman, B. (2014). The big picture for big data: Visualization. Science, 343(6172), 730.

Smirnova, E. (2020). Environmental risk analysis in construction under uncertainty. In Reconstruction and Restoration of Architectural Heritage. Sementsov, S., Leontyev, A., Huerta, S., Menéndez Pidal de Nava, I. (eds.), (pp. 222–227). London: CRC Press.

Smirnova, E. (2021). Monte Carlo simulation of environmental risks of technogenic impact. In Contemporary Problems of Architecture and Construction. Rybnov, E., Akimov, P., Khalvashi, M., Vardanyan, E. (eds.), (pp: 355–360). London: CRC Press.

Smirnova, E., & Larionov, A. (2020). Justification of environmental safety criteria in the context of sustainable development of the construction sector. E3S Web of Conferences 157, 06011.

Smirnova, E., Larionova, Y., & Larionov, A. (2020). Sewer system optimization in housing and communal services. E3S Web of Conferences, 157, 02002.

Sterman, J.D. (2000). Business Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World. Boston: Irwin McGraw-Hill.

Stockhammer, E. (2006). Uncertainty, class, and power. Journal of Political Economy, 35, 31–49.

Szostak, B.L., & Boughzala, Y. (2021). The role of design thinking in corporate social responsibility (CSR) strategy and its influence on innovation. Journal of Innovation Economics & Management, 34, 169–195.

Tolstenko, A., Baltovskij, L., & Radikov, I. (2019). Chance of civic education in Russia. Sage Open, 9(3), 1–16.

Vernadat, F. (2020). Enterprise modelling: Research review and outlook. Computers in Industry, 122, 103265.

Voronkova, V.H., Nikitenko, V.A., & Teslenko, T.V., Bilohur, E.V. (2020). Impact of the worldwide trends on the development of the digital economy. Amazonia Investiga, 9(32), 81–90, https://amazoniainvestiga.info/index.php/amazonia/article/view/1478
Published
2021-06-29
How to Cite
Larionov, A. (2021). Aspects of digitalization of the management system in the course of implementation of housing investment and housing projects. Amazonia Investiga, 10(41), 30-42. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2021.41.05.3
Section
Articles
Bookmark and Share