How to improve researchers' communication, collaboration and commercialization of R&D in regions?
Abstract
The article presents a comprehensive analysis of the current state of the Russian Federation’s regions in terms of the created conditions for cooperation between research teams and the commercialization of scientists’ results of intellectual activity. The authors made an analysis of the estimated indicators, as well as the calculation of the integral index characterizing the given indicators. Case studies of the most developed regions are presented. The resulting conclusions can be the basis for the development of a regional environment that promotes scientific activity.
Downloads
References
Castonguay, L. G. and Muran, J. C. (2014). Fostering collaboration between researchers and clinicians through building practice-oriented research: An introduction, Psychotherapy research: journal of the Society for Psychotherapy research, 25, 1-5.
Fenwick, T. (2012). Complexity science and professional learning for collaboration: a critical reconsideration of possibilities and limitations, Journal of Education and Work, 25(1), 141-162.
Heaton, J., Day, J. and Britten, N. (2016). Collaborative research and the co-production of knowledge for practice:an illustrative case study, Implementation Science, 11.
Hoes, A.-C., Regeer, B. J. and. Bunders, J. F.G (2008). TransFormers in knowledge production: building science–practice collaborations, Action Learning: Research and Practice, 5(3), 207-220.
Knobel, M., Simoes Yamaki, T. and Brito Cruz, C. (2013). International collaborations between research universities: Experiences and best practices, Studies in Higher Education, 1-20
Kolfschoten, G. L. and de Vreede, G.-J. (2009). A Design Approach for Collaboration Processes: A Multimethod Design Science Study in Collaboration Engineering, Journal of Management Information Systems, 26, (1), 225-256.
Korobkina, Y. Sh., Omelchenko, A.M. (2017). Research collaborations: definition, classification and characteristics, Economics: Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow, 7(4A), 72-83.
Maggioni, M. A., Breschi, S. and Panzarasa P. (2013). Multiplexity, Growth Mechanisms and Structural Variety in Scientific Collaboration Networks, Industry and Innovation, 20(3),185-194.
Olin,A. and Ingerman, A. (2016). Features of an Emerging Practice and Professional Development in a Science Teacher Team Collaboration with a Researcher Team, Journal of Science Teacher Education, 27(6), 607-624.
Olson, G. M., Zimmerman, A., Bose, N. (2008). Scientific Collaboration on the Internet. Massachusetts: The MIT Press, Cambridge.
Olswang, L. B. and Goldstein H. (2017). Collaborating on the development and implementation of evidence-based practices: Advancing science and practice, Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention, 11(3-4), 61-71.
Prospects for the Russia’s Development in International Scientific Collaborations (October 01, 2018). From http://sntr-rf.ru/media/280216_Справка_научные_коллаборации.pdf
Simakova E. (2012). Collaboration Talk: The Folk Theories of Nano Research, Science as Culture, 21(2), 177-203.
Smorodinskaya, N. V. (2013) Regional Innovation Clusters: Global Guidelines and Russian Realities, Proceedings of the XIV April International Conference on problems of development of economy and society.
Sturner, K. K., Bishop, P., Lenhart, S.M. (2017). Developing Collaboration Skills in Team Undergraduate Research Experiences, PRIMUS, 27(3), 370-388, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2016.1188432
Tantchou, M. (2017). Collaboration Between Researchers and Knowledge Users in Health Technology Assessment: A Qualitative Exploratory Study, International Journal of Health Policy Management, 6(8), 437-446
Yunwei & Shu (2013). Identifying the Evolution of Patent Assignees Collaboration Networks: A Case of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), COLLNET Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management, 7(1), 69-80.