Problems of legality of investigative actions aimed at finding evidence

Keywords: examination, forensic examination, investigative experiment, prosecutor, investigator.

Abstract

The purpose of the article is a comprehensive study of the problems of establishing the guilt of a person in the offense committed by means of pre-trial investigation by investigators, prosecutors and other persons authorized to do so, as well as establishing the lawfulness of such procedural actions. According to the purpose, it is substantiated that the investigative review is a visual inspection by the authorized persons of the object with the purpose of revealing the traces of the crime, the objects related to its commission, as well as the information about the fact and mechanism of its commission reflected in the features of this object and other circumstances relevant to the proceedings. It is established that the factual basis for the review is primarily data that indicate the possibility of detecting on the body of the person traces of the offense or special signs. Its special procedural basis is the motivated decision of the prosecutor. Procedural actions such as corpse exhumation, investigative experiment and forensic examination have been considered and analyzed. In the process of researching the topic, the authors conclude that in Ukraine the legality and objectivity of investigative actions needs to be more clearly enshrined in law. In particular, the authors propose an additional list of objects of the investigative review and the definition of the investigative examination, the separation of the actual grounds for conducting the examination, the approval of the provisions on the mandatory participation of those understood during the exhumation of the corpse as the investigator, the definition and actual reasons for conducting the investigative experiment as an action, the purpose of which is the experimental verification or refinement of factual data obtained in the course of the investigation, as well as the determination and factual basis of the conduct and appointment of forensic expertise.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Lysenko Volodymyr, National University of the State Fiscal Service of Ukraine

Doctor of Laws, Professor, National University of the State Fiscal Service of Ukraine

Vasyl Yurchyshyn, National University “Odessa Law Academy”

Doctor of Laws, National University “Odessa Law Academy”

Vasyl Shybiko, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv

Doctor of Laws, Professor, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv

References

Belkin R. S. (1959). Theory and practice of investigative experiment. Moscow: Higher Ministry of Internal Affairs of the USSR.

Commentary on the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation (2003).

Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine. Scientific Practice. Comment (2012). Edited by V. Goncharenko, V. Nora, M. Shumila. Kyiv: Justinian.

Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine dated April 13, 2012 No. 4651-VI. Voice of Ukraine.

Efremova S. V. (2004). Validity of the consequences. actions as a guarantee of the rights and freedoms of participants in the process. Samara.

Eisman A. A. (1976). Structure and logical properties of the rules governing the taking of evidence at the preliminary investigation. Issues of combating crime. Moscow.

Gerasimov I. F. (1975). Some problems of crime detection. Sverdlovsk: Middle Ural Book.

Kolesnik V. A. (2012). Investigation (search) actions. Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine. Research Practice comment. Edited by V. Goncharenko, V. Nora, M. Shumila. Kyiv: Justinian.

Kondakov N. I. (1975). Logical reference dictionary. Moscow: Science.

Konovalova V. O. (2008). Reproduction of the situation and circumstances of the event (investigative experiment and on-site testimony). Forensics: Textbook. V. Shepitko, V. Konovalova, V. Zhuravel and others. Kharkiv: Law.

Legal Encyclopedia: 6 vols. (1999). Edited by: Y. Shemshuchenko and others. Kyiv: Ukr. Encycl.

Legal positions and conclusions in criminal cases (Supreme Court case law) (2019). Sciences. Pract. magazine.

Luzgin I. M. (1973). Methodological problems of investigation. Moscow: Law.

On the Prosecutor's Office: Law of Ukraine of October 14, 2014. Information of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine № 2–3. Art. 12.

Rabinovich P. M., Bachinsky T.V. (2015). Formation of foundations of legal outlook, legal consciousness and legal culture of school youth (theoretical and social-legal research). Proceedings of Lviv. lab. of Human Rights and Citizens of the National Research Institute of State Construction and Local Self-Government of the National Academy of Science of Ukraine. Series 1. Vol. 29. Lviv: Issue of LOBF "Medicine and Law".

Report on the Rule of Law (2011). Adopted by the Venice Commission at its 86th plenary session (Venice, 25-26 March 2011) on the basis of comments by Mr Pieter van Dijk, Ms Gret Haller, Mr Jeffrey Jowell, Mr Kaarlo Tuori. Retrieved from: https://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/default.aspx?pdffile=CDL-AD(2011)003rev

Saltevsky M. V. (2001). Forensics: a textbook: At 2 am Kharkiv: Consum.

Schaefer S. A. (2002). Investigative actions. System and procedural form. Moscow: Jurlitinform.

Selmashchuk O. V. (2017) Opening of proceedings in criminal cases: current procedure and directions of improvement. Sciences: Special.

The Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation (2004). Moscow: Omega-L.
Published
2020-04-21
How to Cite
Volodymyr, L., Yurchyshyn, V., & Shybiko, V. (2020). Problems of legality of investigative actions aimed at finding evidence. Amazonia Investiga, 9(28), 113-122. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2020.28.04.14
Section
Articles
Bookmark and Share